Jump to content

Does Intel plan to continue developing their GPUs?

Filingo

I was wondering, after the ARC, which is 2 years old (right?), is Intel planning to keep developing it and try to compete with AMD or Nvidia, or they gave up on that? The A770 was pretty good for its price no? (They need to work more on the drivers as well)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean considering it sometimes is better choice vs it's similarly performing choices from other brands, Intel's probably not going to back down just because they failed once,

 

their 10400F CPU was good until 5600x was better, and less than year after 5600x's release Intel released 11th gen with 11400F, which is about even speed as 5600x,

 

I am certain they can be competitive in the GPU industry too, who knows perhaps they'll surprise both AMD and Nvidia with some technology that somehow helps boosting performance or efficiency of their GPUs..

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, podkall said:

their 10400F CPU was good until 5600x was better, and less than year after 5600x's release Intel released 11th gen with 11400F, which is about even speed as 5600x,

Im going to have to do a small correction there the 11400f is 15-20% slower than the 5600x in single AND multi core. The 11600k was the cpu that came close to the 5600x by only being 5% behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jaslion said:

Im going to have to do a small correction there the 11400f is 15-20% slower than the 5600x in single AND multi core. The 11600k was the cpu that came close to the 5600x by only being 5% behind.

I mean, you are right, but,

 

looking at benchmarks I can see it, the 5600x is better single-core, the only time the 11400F can be seen actually 15-20% slower, is in games like CS2

 

but I guess you also wanna be on AM4 more than on 11th gen's socket, that's like the main downside of 11th gen I guess, though id does have very unique advantage in very specific tasks compared to even a 14th gen

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, podkall said:

I mean, you are right, but,

 

looking at benchmarks I can see it, the 5600x is better single-core, the only time the 11400F can be seen actually 15-20% slower, is in games like CS2

 

but I guess you also wanna be on AM4 more than on 11th gen's socket, that's like the main downside of 11th gen I guess, though id does have very unique advantage in very specific tasks compared to even a 14th gen

Yup avx512 is its main strength. I was basing it off of cinebench and other cpu only benchmarking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×