Jump to content

x8 gaming

skkler

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/v2c44M

 

 

My plan for this is to use 4 cores to run the Main OS then assign 6 cores to 2 VMs for my kids to each have their "own" "computer" i just wanted to make sure i was reading everything right and didnt over look anything. the MOBO manual was a little bit confusing for the PCIE slots but i plan for them to operate in x8 mode. and everything run at PCIE 4.0 speeds. any input is greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure two slower computers will perform significantly better and be more reliable than trying to jerry rig a single computer in this way

 

Why is there two gpus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, skkler said:

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/v2c44M

 

 

My plan for this is to use 4 cores to run the Main OS then assign 6 cores to 2 VMs for my kids to each have their "own" "computer" i just wanted to make sure i was reading everything right and didnt over look anything. the MOBO manual was a little bit confusing for the PCIE slots but i plan for them to operate in x8 mode. and everything run at PCIE 4.0 speeds. any input is greatly appreciated.

An interesting idea, but you're better off just snagging a pair of R5 5600's or 13100f and Asrock Deskmeet's to throw a pair of short RTX 4060's in.

Ryzen 7950x3D PBO +200MHz / -15mV curve CPPC in 'prefer cache'

RTX 4090 @133%/+230/+1000

Builder/Enthusiast/Overclocker since 2012  //  Professional since 2017

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just get 2 separate computers instead of trying to create a weird dual user system setup that will likely be buggy and slow if it works at all.

PC Specifications: Intel i9-14900KF, 5.9GHz all core locked, 5.1GHz ring, 1.425v Medium LLC, E-cores and HT disabled | MSI RTX 4090 Gaming X Trio | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 + Thermal Grizzly contact frame | 2x16 G.Skill Trident Z5 7200MHz CL32 1T 1.45v (Tuned Subtimings, Hynix A-Die) | Gigabyte Z790 AORUS Elite AX | Windows 10 Home 64-Bit EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 T2 Phanteks P400A (black non-rgb version, arctic p12 fans 3 intake from aio, 2 exhaust) | SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB (Boot drive), Samsung 870 EVO 2TB, Crucial P1 500GB

 

Peripherals: Razer Huntsman V2 Full size wired with linear optical switch | Logitech G502 Hero

 

Displays: LG UltraGear 27GP950-B, 4K 144Hz 27" IPS Asus TUF Gaming VG279QM, 1080p 280Hz 27" IPS

 

Microphone: Audio-technica AT2020USB+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, skkler said:

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/v2c44M

 

 

My plan for this is to use 4 cores to run the Main OS then assign 6 cores to 2 VMs for my kids to each have their "own" "computer" i just wanted to make sure i was reading everything right and didnt over look anything. the MOBO manual was a little bit confusing for the PCIE slots but i plan for them to operate in x8 mode. and everything run at PCIE 4.0 speeds. any input is greatly appreciated.

 

I concur with above replies. But if you are are determined you can likely bring costs down with a 2x16GB memory kit and B550 motherboard, (a number of B550 motherboards support dual GPU). I'd also suggest a 650W psu and case with better airflow.

 

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, emosun said:

Im pretty sure two slower computers will perform significantly better and be more reliable than trying to jerry rig a single computer in this way

 

Why is there two gpus

To dedicate 1 to each VM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, skkler said:

To dedicate 1 to each VM

So youre working under the assumption that the machine will not only run the same speed as two slower machines , but also will be so stable that youll somehow fully utilised two seperate gpus at the same speed as well, correct?

 

Im really hoping you arent assuming software emulation is the same as just having actual hardware running the software correctly. Because if that were true the machine would still be less reliable than two computers. If this single machine breaks or has a fault , then BOTH users will be unable to use the machine vs only one user.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×