M.2 SSD confusion
3 hours ago, SeemsLegit said:PCI Express, SATA, PCI-E and NVMe
PCI Express = PCI-E = NVMe = M.2, this is connection type/disk protocol/format used for SSD drives.
SATA is an older protocol/connection, used for both SSD and HDD. Drives can have format of 2.5" for SSD and 3.5" for HDD. SATA SSD is slower than NVMe one, because it's an older type of connection designed for HDDs.
First of all, you always want to have your OS (operating system) on a SSD (a boot drive = drive with OS). On a high-end system I'd go for NVMe, price difference isn't high enough to not do it. Preferably a 512GB, that's big enough for a boot drive and apps while usually being better in terms of GB/$ than 256 ones.
And you also need to store your game library somewhere. How much space will it take is entirely up to you, for some 1TB is enough, for some - 10TB isn't. But don't worry, you can easily add storage later. Here comes the first choice: Do you want SSD or HDD for you library? The only difference is loading times of games, no performance impact at all - and of course price. Should you choose SSD, I'd go for SATA, as in case of game loading times, the difference isn't really noticeable, as shown in the video linked. And 2nd reason I'll go into later. Now it gets more complicated, because if you choose HDD then for a part of the money saved you can go for a 512GB boot SSD and move your most frequently played games to there so you'll onlyneed to load from HDD your rarely played ones.
I apologise for the wall of text, but it somehow came out like this. Concluding, if you don't mind spending extra money, your steam library is rather small or you absolutely can't stand longer loading times, go for SSD storage - but make sure they have DRAM cache, and generally refer to the tier list on this forum (with any drives btw - do your research as well tho). If your steam library is pretty large, you don't mind longer loading times or don't see reason to spend more money on this, then go for HDD.
Now, coming back to why only 1 NVMe, and why at all? Yes, in loading times use you might barely see a difference between SATA and NVMe, but I just can't recommend a high-end system to have only SATA. And why 1? Direct storage is coming to windows soon TM . It'll basically speed up loading times by a lot if you have PCIe gen 4. Your CPU and your motherboard have this, so I'd leave an option to get a drive that supports it in the future. Not yet however, as by the time it actually gets introduced many things may happen, including you building a new computer, or PCIe Gen 4 SSD prices dropping by half (they're pretty expensive now). "Normal" ones you'll see are gen 3, and go for that.
TL;DR: 512GB NVMe boot drive + for game library either SATA SSD for faster loading times or HDD for cheaper. Size of those depends on you and your library.
Final thing you asked - don't fill up a SSD drive. It is generally recomended (although not a must) to have about 20% free at all times, because filling it up completely will reduce both speed and life span - think about it as trying to find something in a truck with boxes up to the roof. HDDs don't have this problem however.
Edit: When you'll be building your PC, the NVMe will probably go to the gen 4 capable slot, as that probably goes directly to CPU, not thruogh motherboard chipset. Check manual though.
Edit 2: Reading your other comments in this thread you seem to think that drives have to go to M.2 slot. SATA ones go to SATA ports, you have 6 of those on your MoBo. You can also plug SSDs to PCIe extension slots if you run out of M.2.
Edit 3: <rant> As a sidenote, so many people here have no idea what are they talking about... How can you possibly recommend a disk size without even asking about Steam library size??? Why do you reccomend 2x gen3 SSDs when gen4 with direct storage is just behind the corner, without even leaving a free slot while OP's CPU and MoBo can support it - OP would have to sell one of disks to have space for a gen 4 capable! And why do you recommend a NVMe of an unknown brand (in SSD market it's a synonym to questionable) and with mediocre warranty, while you can get a SATA one from a known brand and with much longer warranty for cheaper and have no notable performance difference? </rant>
3 hours ago, HairlessMonkeyBoy said:
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now