3080 warzone underperformance

[Jnys]

According to this video i should get around 180 fps with my settings. I play basically on all low 1440p and still get 100 to-140 compared to this guy.

5600x msi 3080 gaming x trio.

3600mhz ram cl 16

650w psu

[jaslion]

Euhm what. Warzone has a 130fps cap basically due to engine limits so you aren't under performing by any means it's just a not so well made game not being able to go that high issue.

[MadPistol]

Different CPU. Different system.

According to this, Intel's 10 series CPUs outperform Ryzen 5000 in Warzone.
 

 

[Tristerin]

That and its a network game - how do you fare when playing the BASE game?

[Mark Kaine]

2 hours ago, Jnys said:

According to this video i should get around 180 fps with my settings.

Thats not how it works. they have a completely different system than you have. just watching a video does not give you magically the same hw. 

 

I mean it says more than clearly "INTEL" 

[jaslion]

2 minutes ago, Mark Kaine said:

Thats not how it works. they have a completely different system than you have. just watching a video does not give you magically the same hw. 

 

I mean it says more than clearly "INTEL" 

It's also kinda odd as like all other benchmarks even with intel don't really push past 140 either as there was an engine performance issue. Odd behavior tho as other benchmarkers don't get those numbers.

 

Edit: Looked at a couple other cpu's like the 10400f, 9900k and 10700k but with a range of different cards (3060ti, 3070, 3080 and rx6800) on at most high settings 1080p and the gpu was not at 100% on any of the benchmarks and the framerate at most sometimes went to 150fps but only for a second so something is odd in that review.

[Mark Kaine]

3 minutes ago, jaslion said:

It's also kinda odd as like all other benchmarks even with intel don't really push past 140 either as there was an engine performance issue. Odd behavior tho as other benchmarkers don't get those numbers.

yeah... you can do a lot of tricks with "benchmarks" usually. Especially on youtube... 

 

edit: I mean even if there's some hard cap... it's on a pc, nothing that can't be modded away lol 

[jaslion]

2 minutes ago, Mark Kaine said:

yeah... you can do a lot of tricks with "benchmarks" usually. Especially on youtube... 

Yeah for sure something is not right. Nobody can get 180fps stable even with the trickery people tried at most they got 170ish on 720p low res scaling with many things turned of and edited in the game files so I thing something went wrong. That and many other reviews basically put the 5600x as a better cpu with the 10600k only pulling ahead ever so slightly in a couple games. The cs go numbers are especially odd as literally every other reviewer had MASSIVE leaps over intel there and here it's basically identical even tho we know a 3080 can push over 400fps in 1080p cs:go standard high settings.

 

So maybe she just had a small glitch or a wrong bios setting by accident active?

[Falkentyne]

5 hours ago, jaslion said:

Euhm what. Warzone has a 130fps cap basically due to engine limits so you aren't under performing by any means it's just a not so well made game not being able to go that high issue.

Are you high?  I get over 200 FPS in Warzone on my 3090.

[Mark Kaine]

7 hours ago, jaslion said:

Warzone has a 130fps cap basically due to engine limits

Euhm, im getting ~160fps in battle royale at 1080p, high'ish/ultra settings... 

 

 

wouldn't surprise me if op's cpu is somewhat bottlenecking a 3080, this seems very cpu heavy, aka terribly optimized as per usual for these games - I haven't checked per core usage however. 

 

 

6 hours ago, Tristerin said:

how do you fare when playing the BASE game?

I cannot answer this question since the 'base' game costs money.

[maizenblue]

15 hours ago, MadPistol said:

Different CPU. Different system.

According to this, Intel's 10 series CPUs outperform Ryzen 5000 in Warzone.
 

 

There was an update vid. Some setting was changed and fps went up if i remember.