Jump to content

RAM Speeds - What should I be aiming for

SM Phoo

Hey guys, like many others, building a new PC in a few months and I want to get it completely right.

One thing I've never paid much attention to is the latency side of things.

 

Been reading a bit but I can't fully get my head around it, but it seems speed still matters more than latency, but getting the best of both is obviously ideal. (According to a crucial article)

Anyway, I'd like to purchase the Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB and my options are:

3600 - 18 - 22 - 22 - 42

3200 - 16 - 18 - 18 - 36

3000 - 15 - 17 - 17 - 35

 

Now, considering all three kits are the same price. Is their much of a performance difference?

Reading reddit, I found a chart and basically all three resulted in a score of 10 (Not sure what the score meant, but they seemed to have identical performance going off that)

I'd hopefully like to use it with Zen 3 CPU when they're released

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The higher the clock of the RAM, the higher the clock off the IF, that affects the performance the most. 

Then for every 1ns of latency you get about 0.5%-1% of performance improvement. 

 

IDK how much you care about RGB on RAM, but I highly recommend the Crucial kits as they can be OC'd fairly easily to high speeds. They are not as low latency as Samsung B-die but typically much cheaper and easier to get. 

I know that some of those Corsair kits use Micron E-die but I don't know which ones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

the lower clocked ones may have binned lower, but latency on all 3 is identical. basic memory latency calculator https://notkyon.moe/ram-latency.htm

desktop

Spoiler

r5 3600,3450@0.9v (0.875v get) 4.2ghz@1.25v (1.212 get) | custom loop cpu&gpu 1260mm nexxos xt45 | MSI b450i gaming ac | crucial ballistix 2x8 3000c15->3733c15@1.39v(1.376v get) |Zotac 2060 amp | 256GB Samsung 950 pro nvme | 1TB Adata su800 | 4TB HGST drive | Silverstone SX500-LG

HTPC

Spoiler

HTPC i3 7300 | Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H | 16GB G Skill | Adata XPG SX8000 128GB M.2 | Many HDDs | Rosewill FBM-01 | Corsair CXM 450W

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SM Phoo said:

Hey guys, like many others, building a new PC in a few months and I want to get it completely right.

One thing I've never paid much attention to is the latency side of things.

 

Been reading a bit but I can't fully get my head around it, but it seems speed still matters more than latency, but getting the best of both is obviously ideal. (According to a crucial article)

Anyway, I'd like to purchase the Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB and my options are:

3600 - 18 - 22 - 22 - 42

3200 - 16 - 18 - 18 - 36

3000 - 15 - 17 - 17 - 35

 

Now, considering all three kits are the same price. Is their much of a performance difference?

Reading reddit, I found a chart and basically all three resulted in a score of 10 (Not sure what the score meant, but they seemed to have identical performance going off that)

I'd hopefully like to use it with Zen 3 CPU when they're released

 

Thanks

Well, first off, when it's reported with the speed as 18-22-22-42, it's actually talking about timings, not latency.

Latency is a measure of time in regards to actions... while the timings is the number of cycles it waits.

 

So 3600 CL 18 actually has less latency than 3000 CL 18, because the 18 cycles happen faster.

If they're all achieving the same latency, the higher speed is preferable across the board.

Main: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti, 16 GB 4400 MHz DDR4 Fedora 38 x86_64

Secondary: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 16 GB 2667 MHz DDR4, Fedora 38 x86_64

Server: AMD Athlon PRO 3125GE, 32 GB 2667 MHz DDR4 ECC, TrueNAS Core 13.0-U5.1

Home Laptop: Intel Core i5-L16G7, 8 GB 4267 MHz LPDDR4x, Windows 11 Home 22H2 x86_64

Work Laptop: Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA Quadro P520, 8 GB 2667 MHz DDR4, Windows 10 Pro 22H2 x86_64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WereCat said:

The higher the clock of the RAM, the higher the clock off the IF, that affects the performance the most. 

Then for every 1ns of latency you get about 0.5%-1% of performance improvement. 

 

IDK how much you care about RGB on RAM, but I highly recommend the Crucial kits as they can be OC'd fairly easily to high speeds. They are not as low latency as Samsung B-die but typically much cheaper and easier to get. 

I know that some of those Corsair kits use Micron E-die but I don't know which ones. 

Unfortunately I've been suckered in and do like that RAM, so as much as I want the best performance, I'll have to sacrifice some for the one I like.

4 minutes ago, Cyracus said:

the lower clocked ones may have binned lower, but latency on all 3 is identical. basic memory latency calculator https://notkyon.moe/ram-latency.htm

 

Thanks. That calculator gives me the exact same numbers as that reddit post. I think in this instance, getting the 3600 would be best.

 

4 minutes ago, svmlegacy said:

Well, first off, when it's reported with the speed as 18-22-22-42, it's actually talking about timings, not latency.

Latency is a measure of time in regards to actions... while the timings is the number of cycles it waits.

 

So 3600 CL 18 actually has less latency than 3000 CL 18, because the 18 cycles happen faster.

If they're all achieving the same latency, the higher speed is preferable across the board.

Ok, thank you. So 3600 would be the one to go for. I thought as much, just wanted to be sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×