Jump to content

SMART info incorrect? - excessive Total Host Writes

Anywher

Hi Guys

 

The system drive on my 'Media PC' is showing some very scary SMART readings. I bought this drive about 3.5  years ago and it's sitting at 1% health? - 148779 GB Total Host Writes which I calculated is 113 GB per day on a 120 GB drive!

 

Just some background on this machine. It sits powered on 24h with a bittorrent client running but all data is written and read from an external 6TB USB drive plus our downloads are very light.   We then have a windows share on the external 6TB to watch TV shows on our android tablets or laptops.

 

Resource monitor doesn't show anything abnormal. I feel like I'm going a bit crazy here.. is it possible that the SMART data is incorrect or is there something about our setup that could be causing this?

 

Thanks!

IMG_20200821_181759.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Anywher said:

is it possible that the SMART data incorrect

Smart data is generally not incorrect. But this seemes weird

 

I will recommend an NHu12s (or an NHd15 (maybe)) for your PC build. Quote or @ me @Prodigy_Smit for me to see your replies.

PSU Teir List | Howdy! A Windows Hello Alternative 

 

 

Desktop :

i7 8700 | Quadro P4000 8GB |  64gb 2933Mhz cl18 | 500 GB Samsung 960 Pro | 1tb SSD Samsung 850 evo

Laptop :

ASUS G14 | R9 5900hs | RTX 3060 | 16GB 3200Mhz | 1 TB SSD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some manufacturers don't really stick to SMART standards, I had this with WD drives which basically required you to use the SMART monitoring program from WD to get correct readings. For this reason I would say give samsungs own SMART reader a go, the values maybe make more sense in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's very possible SMART sensors report incorrect data back. I had an SSD that reported its temperature as 128C throughout its 7+year working life in my file server, while other drives in that same enclosure were around 40-ish. And a HDD I have reports 4.3bn seek error rate as well as 20+bn raw error rate. But it still reports as a healthy disk in the RAID it's in.

"You don't need eyes to see, you need vision"

 

(Faithless, 'Reverence' from the 1996 Reverence album)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That average write rate works out to be over 1MB/s. I was going to speculate if some background logging data might be responsible but that's a lot if it were the case. Look again at resource monitor, is there 1MB/s total between everything going on?

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, porina said:

That average write rate works out to be over 1MB/s. I was going to speculate if some background logging data might be responsible but that's a lot if it were the case. Look again at resource monitor, is there 1MB/s total between everything going on?

I have been monitoring the resource monitor while downloading / seeding and watching a show on my phone and all I see are occasional spikes of approximately 60-100 KB/s for writes. The External drive is seeing all the activity.

51 minutes ago, cynexit said:

Some manufacturers don't really stick to SMART standards, I had this with WD drives which basically required you to use the SMART monitoring program from WD to get correct readings. For this reason I would say give samsungs own SMART reader a go, the values maybe make more sense in there.

Thanks I will try this. I wasn't aware they had their own software. I'll report back

Edited by Anywher
typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Anywher said:

I have been monitoring the resource monitor while downloading / seeding and watching a show on my phone and all I see are occasional spikes of approximately 60-100 KB/s for writes. The External drive is seeing all the activity.

I don't know what options there are, but it would be interesting to somehow log disk activity on the SSD only. If there is nothing writing a little all the time, it could be something else writing a lot in one go, but not when you're looking at it.

 

I have to wonder if write amplification might apply here, but given the description is Host Writes I'm guessing not. 

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got Samsung magician (what annoying UI) and got same results. Showing up as 145 TB written and status as 'Good' 🤨

 

Should I be seeing performance issues with this SSD if in fact I have written 145TB to it? No performance issues to report and benchmarks look good.

 

2 minutes ago, porina said:

I don't know what options there are, but it would be interesting to somehow log disk activity on the SSD only. If there is nothing writing a little all the time, it could be something else writing a lot in one go, but not when you're looking at it.

 

I have to wonder if write amplification might apply here, but given the description is Host Writes I'm guessing not. 

Yeah good idea I'll look into logging disk activity for a few days.

 

At this stage I am tempted to clone this drive to my spare Corsair 120GB SSD and see what happens with that drive.

 

if the Media PC was to go down during COVID lockdown it will be a pretty bad time for me. 😬

IMG_20200821_200844.jpg

IMG_20200821_200949.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Anywher said:

Got Samsung magician (what annoying UI) and got same results. Showing up as 145 TB written and status as 'Good' 🤨

 

Should I be seeing performance issues with this SSD if in fact I have written 145TB to it? No performance issues to report and benchmarks look good.

I would argue the values are correct then, but if the status is still "Good" you do not have anything to worry about. It has often been reported that SSDs can take way more writes than the manufacturer says on the fact sheet (see here and the end of the test).

As long as there is sufficient free space (15%~20%) on the disk to trim and shuffle blocks without issues then there is a good chance drives can take much more TB written than expected. That being said: I would keep Samsung magician (totally agree on the UI btw) running in the background so it can alert you if the drive is actually starting to fail (afaik it should then go into read-only mode).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cynexit said:

I would argue the values are correct then, but if the status is still "Good" you do not have anything to worry about. It has often been reported that SSDs can take way more writes than the manufacturer says on the fact sheet (see here and the end of the test).

As long as there is sufficient free space (15%~20%) on the disk to trim and shuffle blocks without issues then there is a good chance drives can take much more TB written than expected. That being said: I would keep Samsung magician (totally agree on the UI btw) running in the background so it can alert you if the drive is actually starting to fail (afaik it should then go into read-only mode).

Thanks for this. I will keep Samsung Magician running and keep monitoring the drive. It has over 55GB free as it's just the system drive plus a few programs.

 

In the meantime I found a guide on how to log disk activity using windows performance monitor if anyone is interested - https://www.smartertools.com/blog/2016/07/15-configure-perfmon-to-prevent-disk-issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×