What should I build

[Video Editor 2020]

@TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp last question, are 2 2080 super sli linked better than one 2080 ti?

[GoldenLag]

26 minutes ago, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

CPU Cooler Thermaltake Water 3.0 360 ARGB Sync Edition 56.45 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler $163.99 @ Amazon

Motherboard ASRock TRX40 TAICHI ATX sTRX4 Motherboard $490.99 @ B&H

"eh" watercooler and the TRX40 board with 3 fans for no good reason. in other words its a pretty poor board for what it offers with 3 times the fans that can fail. 

26 minutes ago, Video Editor 2020 said:

@TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp thanks that looks great

wouldnt recommend it due to some "eh" components as pointed out above. also its really just a waste for what you are doing. 

[Helpful Tech Witch]

4 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

"eh" watercooler and the TRX40 board with 3 fans for no good reason. in other words its a pretty poor board for what it offers with 3 times the fans that can fail. 

i did that board b/c msi is in a bit of trouble rn, and gigabyte is inconsistent. 

[Video Editor 2020]

@GoldenLag what would u recommend 

[Mateyyy]

4 minutes ago, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

i did that board b/c msi is in a bit of trouble rn, and gigabyte is inconsistent. 

I really don't get what you mean by "MSI is in a bit of trouble" and "Gigabyte is inconsistent".

[Helpful Tech Witch]

2 minutes ago, Mateyyy said:

I really don't get what you mean by "MSI is in a bit of trouble" and "Gigabyte is inconsistent".

 MSI is in their whole paying people to not make bad reviews thing, ans Gigabyte has problems with failing boards.

[SFFDesigns]

Just now, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

MSI is in their whole paying people to not make bad reviews thing

sure but does that affect the products? no

 

Just now, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

ans Gigabyte has problems with failing boards.

Never heard of any widespread issue. 

 

Both brands make good products so I don't see why avoiding them is necessary

 

[Mateyyy]

7 minutes ago, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

 MSI is in their whole paying people to not make bad reviews thing

Yeah, their marketing and PR department has a bunch of clowns in it. If you think that's a problem, you'd be really surprised if you were to really look into other companies as well.

Their engineers have nothing to do with those guys btw. I've seen other people going like "I'm not buying MSI because their marketing blablabla", without taking into account that those people have nothing to do with the actual products themselves. The engineers are the ones who actually put the work into those specific products, and if issues arise, they're also the ones to fix them. Not some bozos that like throwing company money at reviewers.

 

For instance,ook at AMD's "6% faster" graphs where it looks like it's 3x as fast as the product they're comparing to, or Intel's stupid marketing that unfortunately I can't think of a good example of.

 

7 minutes ago, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

ans Gigabyte has problems with failing boards.

Huh? Some proof behind such a claim maybe?

[Helpful Tech Witch]

1 hour ago, Mateyyy said:

For instance,ook at AMD's "6% faster" graphs where it looks like it's 3x as fast as the product they're comparing to, or Intel's stupid marketing that unfortunately I can't think of a good example of.

Saying that they are good for x thing that isnt gaming.

 

1 hour ago, Mateyyy said:

Huh? Some proof behind such a claim maybe?

On the failling mobos, ive noticed lots for fourm posts on failing gigabyte mobos and problems with gigabyte ones than any other.

[Mateyyy]

8 minutes ago, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

Saying that they are good for x thing that isnt gaming.

Adobe?

8 minutes ago, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

On the failling mobos, ive noticed lots for fourm posts on failing gigabyte mobos and problems with gigabyte ones than any other.

Source, not what you happened to see on a forum.

[Helpful Tech Witch]

18 minutes ago, Mateyyy said:

Source, not what you happened to see on a forum.

no other scource, just what ive seen recently.

[Helpful Tech Witch]

21 minutes ago, Mateyyy said:

Adobe?

 

https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Premiere-Pro-CPU-performance-Intel-Core-10th-Gen-vs-AMD-Ryzen-3rd-Gen-1763/

[Mateyyy]

18 minutes ago, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

no other scource, just what ive seen recently.

So you've no actual source, okay. Maybe don't make claims like "oh all their boards are dying" then.

17 minutes ago, TheTechWizardThatNeedsHelp said:

https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Premiere-Pro-CPU-performance-Intel-Core-10th-Gen-vs-AMD-Ryzen-3rd-Gen-1763/

Premiere isn't the only program in the Adobe suite, but regardless, the fact that the 10900K is on par or beats the 3900X sounds to me like some good optimisations made for Intel. And that's excluding QuickSync.

AMD clearly wins when we get to HEDT (what's actually relevant to the OP), because of just having more raw processing power than what Intel has to offer.

[Helpful Tech Witch]

56 minutes ago, Mateyyy said:

Premiere isn't the only program in the Adobe suite, but regardless, the fact that the 10900K is on par or beats the 3900X sounds to me like some good optimisations made for Intel. And that's excluding QuickSync.

AMD clearly wins when we get to HEDT (what's actually relevant to the OP), because of just having more raw processing power than what Intel has to offer.

IK. Though i wish they tested a R3 3100 vs i3 10100 and a R5 3600vs a i5 10600, i think that would be a large part, though it doesnt apply to this thread.