Jump to content

why 3600 and 3600x are so much faster then i7 8086k?

Go to solution Solved by Deli,

Ryzen 2 has 15% better IPC than Intel's 14nm+++++. Clock speed isn't the only thing that counts.

all 3 CPUs have 6 core 12 threads.

here are the specs for all three cpus 

Ryzen 5 3600      3.6GHz base, 4.2GHz  boost.

Ryzen 5 3600x    3.8GHz  base, 4.4GHz  boost.

Core i7 8086k      4.0GHz  base, 5.0GHz  boost. speeds bins 3/4/4/5/6/10 (with slowest core boosting to 4.3GHz)

 

Clearly 8086k should be faster, but it gets destroyed in multi-threading and just about beats 3600 and 3600x at single threaded workloads.

 

Now of course i7 is manufactured on 14nm++ process and ryzen is made on 7nm process. but intel 14nm++ parts similer to AMD 10 nm parts in density of transistors. so, shouldn't be that much difference in architectural performance .    

 

I'm thinking of buying the upcoming i5 10600k which is rumored to have similar specs as i7 8086k but with slightly lower clock speeds. 6 core 12 threads at 3.7 GHz base, 4.7GHz boost and 4.9GHZ single core boost.

 

Now on paper it looks like i5 10600k should destroy 3600x even multi-threading with is 12 threads boosting to 4.9 GHz. but if 10600k preforms similar to Core i7 8086k then there is no point of buying this, and just go AMD.   

 

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, linustechtipscom said:

all 3 CPUs have 6 core 12 threads.

What benchmarks are you looking at?

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ryzen 2 has 15% better IPC than Intel's 14nm+++++. Clock speed isn't the only thing that counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deli said:

Ryzen 2 has 15% better IPC than Intel's 14nm+++++. Clock speed isn't the only thing that counts.

so Intel is dead until 10nm comes out in 2020, but intel 10nm for desktop is cancelled so Intel is dead until 7nm comes out in 2022.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, linustechtipscom said:

so Intel is dead until 10nm comes out in 2020, but intel 10nm for desktop is cancelled so Intel is dead until 7nm comes out in 2022.   

For gaming, Intel still has a slight edge.

 

We will see what Intel can do with its 10nm for desktop next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You buy the appropriated hardware for your needs, many software will perform better on the i7... a few synthetic benchmarks aren't the whole deal there is to it.

 

The 8700K and variants is a great processor, if you own one you have nothing to really worry about... it's just not what people should be buying today though specially at retail price and what not.

 

For a gaming only system with high refresh rate in mind the 9700KF could be used, a decent build with it will cost no more than a build with a 3700X but it will game better always and lose at stuff like maya and CGI etc... where if you're just gaming won't matter and you still gain fps specially if you're going all out on a 2080 Super or something.

 

If not the case the 3600 will always be the best pick, it games almost the same as every other ryzen chip within very small margins between it and the 3900X and it is "inexpensive" high power solution.

 

If you ever "need" a 8 cores processor it will be here in a couple years yet and by then you'll just want the whatever newest great deal is.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×