Is gigabyte bios really that bad?

[Cristuu]

After hearing to some recommendations, I decided to consider a gigabyte mobo for my new build with a 9700k. However, searching for info here and there, it was my observation that many users said they had terrible experiences with gigabyte bios and were much happier since they moved to a different brand. So, since I'm considering a gigabyte, I was wondering, is it that bad? Are there real compromises or it's just that it takes more work/time to config it? I really don't mind a one-time work. Once I get the job done I'm good? But are people picking a different brand just so they don't lose 10 or 20 more minutes on the initial config?

[Semper]

My only experience with Gigabyte has been with an FX chip, so my comparison is a little apples to oranges (BIOS vs UEFI for my  current system)
I think both subjectively and objectively, UEFI is better, but the Gigabyte board I had did struggle with translation errors and miscommunication. A number of things I had to look up to find a communal effort to discover exactly what they were. Natively, though, the BIOS did what it needed to. It didn't give me any issue in that regard.