Jump to content

My Kingston SSD SA400 is kinda slow..

qtnovr

Hello !

So I recently saw that my ssd was a lot of times at 100% usage and I have some freezes while playing games (mostly fortnite)

I've made a benchmark using CrystalDiskMark. The numbers looks really low but I don't have the knowledge for that.

Here's my specs:

 

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2600

GPU: MSI GTX 1060

SSD: Kingston SSD SA400

HDD: WD Caviar Blue 1TO

MOBO: GIGABYTE X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

 

If you need more informations, please ask me! Thanks in advance 

ssdtest.jpg

 

 

Btw, I have AMD StoreMI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, qtnovr said:

 

Is the drive near capacity or something?
 

https://hddmag.com/kingston-a400-review/

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kingston A400 120GB Crystal DiskMark

 

 

There's a huge difference with the review sadly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your sequential numbers are the main difference here.  I would chalk that up to your drive being very full.  Particularly when it comes to writes this is a problem.

 

Also keep in mind the new interface when comparing numbers between versions:

image.png.ca1fc4c3cd4dcec924fce5aa7fb6d87c.png

Solve your own audio issues  |  First Steps with RPi 3  |  Humidity & Condensation  |  Sleep & Hibernation  |  Overclocking RAM  |  Making Backups  |  Displays  |  4K / 8K / 16K / etc.  |  Do I need 80+ Platinum?

If you can read this you're using the wrong theme.  You can change it at the bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Streetguru said:

Is the drive near capacity or something?

90.jpg.665fb566a84c0d7bf9e4e2e204bdbaab.jpg

As you see. :)

 

Also - it's Kingston crap, what do you expect?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kingston isn't crap. It's a budget SSD. I got an A400 at work and it's also not very fast. Idc because it was $25.

CPU: AMD 3800X GPU: GTX 1080 Ti RAM: (16GB) 2x Corsair 8gb DDR4 3200Mhz Drives: SanDisk 240GB SSD, Samsung 500GB SSD, WD 1TB HDD

Motherboard: MSI X470 Gaming pro plus PSU: Gigabyte 650 watt Monitor(s): 27 inch AOC 1440p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dionkoffie said:

Kingston isn't crap. It's a budget SSD. I got an A400 at work and it's also not very fast. Idc because it was $25.

 

No, especially when their pendrives can be as bad as worst noname (I have one that died after 3rd write) or when they change memory and controller of their infamous V300 (link). I don't remember when I last time saw something signed by Kingston that isn't crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Ryan_Vickers said:

Your sequential numbers are the main difference here.  I would chalk that up to your drive being very full.  Particularly when it comes to writes this is a problem.

 

Also keep in mind the new interface when comparing numbers between versions:

image.png.ca1fc4c3cd4dcec924fce5aa7fb6d87c.png

 

Thank you for those usefull informations ! Helps a lot :)

 

47 minutes ago, homeap5 said:

90.jpg.665fb566a84c0d7bf9e4e2e204bdbaab.jpg

As you see. :)

 

Also - it's Kingston crap, what do you expect?

 

I've got this SSD with my GTX 1060, I wasn't really aware about kingston's products so I though it was a good deal.
 

Also, didn't know about the fact that a ssd can be slower when it's full. I'm gonna delete some files then, thank you !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, qtnovr said:

Also, didn't know about the fact that a ssd can be slower when it's full. I'm gonna delete some files then, thank you !

It shouldn't be THAT slower.

 

For example - my OLD SSD Samsung 840 EVO:

crystal.png.4144ec9f374a9eef3b177d47b9afa4da.png

93% full. No OP. And results are much better.

And that was not the best Samsung product with know problems.

 

So - Kingston is what it is. I even prefer Adata more than Kingston.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, homeap5 said:

 

The samsung drive might have more reserved space for swapping files to keep it fast even when it's nearing capacity.

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×