Jump to content

what are Ryzen speed bins/ boost clock for individual cores?

Go to solution Solved by Vishera,
1 minute ago, linustechtipscom said:

I was looking on CPU benchmarks on the internet and it looks like stock AMD CPU are preforming much better then they should. Could it be possible that AMD CPU are dynamically boosting all core to max boost speed. Intel's mother boards have a setting called Enhanced Turbo which boosts all cores to max boost clock which you can manually enable or disable.

AMD CPUs boost as much as possible,with all core boost too,it works similarly to how GPUs boost.

I can't find any information on the max boost clock for individual Ryzen cores. lets take 3700x for example. Base clock is 3.6 GHz and max boot for the fastest core is 4.4GHz. Whats the max bost clock for other 7 cores? surly it cant be 4.4 for all core then that would be just 4.4GHz overclock.(kind of) 

 

linustechtips.com admin (not really)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's the thing, precision boost scale differently on different CPUs even if the model is the same. It's too dynamic to give a proper number.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every chip is different,some are better than others,the better chips require less voltage at same frequencies,so they will boost higher than others.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Intel has exact number for max boost clock for each core. for instant core i7 8700k individual boost clocks:

core 1 4.3 GHz

core 2 4.4 GHz

core 3 4.4 GHz

core 4 4.5 GHz

core 5 4.6 GHz

core 6 4.7 GHz

and base clock is 3.7 Ghz. 

 

why are't there slimier numbers for Ryzen chips 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like others said. Every chips is different. Also depends on your cooling solution.

 

Just for reference, it may not be the same for other 3900x. My 3900x with a 280mm rad will stay at ~4.55GHz for 1-2 cores heavy load. ~4.45GHz for 3-4 cores heavy load. And ~4.1 Ghz for all 12 cores load like Handbrake.

 

I run no PBO or auto-overclock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, linustechtipscom said:

Intel has exact number for max boost clock for each core. for instant core i7 8700k individual boost clocks:

core 1 4.3 GHz

core 2 4.4 GHz

core 3 4.4 GHz

core 4 4.5 GHz

core 5 4.6 GHz

core 6 4.7 GHz

and base clock is 3.7 Ghz. 

 

why are't there slimier numbers for Ryzen chips 

Ryzen boost clock is temperature dependent. If you use a lesser cooler, the boost clock will be a little lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deli said:

Ryzen boost clock is temperature dependent.

And chip quality dependent too.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vishera said:

And chip quality dependent too.

3900x chips are binned. I see most of them will boost to about the same clock speed. +- 100MHz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Deli said:

3900x chips are binned. I see most of them will boost to about the same clock speed. +- 100MHz.

lets say we have the sufficient cooler. What AMD grantees each core will boost to considering no overclocking is applied. So, what are the official speed bins numbers for Rzyen chips?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, linustechtipscom said:

lets say we have the sufficient cooler. What AMD grantees each core will boost to considering no overclocking is applied. So, what are the official speed bins numbers for Rzyen chips?

I don't think there is an official number except base and maximum boost(one core, faction of a second). I've yet to see a 3900x boost all core below 4.0GHz when there is sufficient cooling. Although the base clock is only 3.8GHz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was looking on CPU benchmarks on the internet and it looks like stock AMD CPU are preforming much better then they should. Could it be possible that AMD CPU are dynamically boosting all core to max boost speed. Intel's mother boards have a setting called Enhanced Turbo which boosts all cores to max boost clock which you can manually enable or disable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, linustechtipscom said:

I was looking on CPU benchmarks on the internet and it looks like stock AMD CPU are preforming much better then they should. Could it be possible that AMD CPU are dynamically boosting all core to max boost speed. Intel's mother boards have a setting called Enhanced Turbo which boosts all cores to max boost clock which you can manually enable or disable.

AMD CPUs boost as much as possible,with all core boost too,it works similarly to how GPUs boost.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, linustechtipscom said:

I was looking on CPU benchmarks on the internet and it looks like stock AMD CPU are preforming much better then they should. Could it be possible that AMD CPU are dynamically boosting all core to max boost speed. Intel's mother boards have a setting called Enhanced Turbo which boosts all cores to max boost clock which you can manually enable or disable.

I use Gigabyte mobo. There is no such setting as far as I know as Enhance Turbo. Buildzoid made a video about Gigabyte BIOS. I watch the whole thing, and went through all the settings.

 

PBO and Auto -overclock in Ryzen Master only gives ~100MHz extra boost for all cores work load. It doesn't do much for 1 or 2 cores thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Deli said:

I use Gigabyte mobo. There is no such setting as far as I know as Enhance Turbo. Buildzoid made a video about Gigabyte BIOS. I watch the whole thing, and went through all the settings.

I use a Gigabyte motherboard too,I confirm there is no such option.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Vishera said:

AMD CPUs boost as much as possible,with all core boost too,it works similarly to how GPUs boost.

source? if that's the case then stock 3900x is just an overclock 4.6 GHZ 12 core CPU, given that there is enough cooling

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, linustechtipscom said:

source? if that's the case then stock 3900x is just an overclock 4.6 GHZ 12 core CPU, given that there is enough cooling

 

It won't boost to all core 4.6GHz.

 

A good chip will do 4.4Ghz all core overclock. Mine can only do 4.3Ghz with 1.38v.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, linustechtipscom said:

source? if that's the case then stock 3900x is just an overclock 4.6 GHZ 12 core CPU.  

It doesn't boost 4.6GHz all core...

I said it boosts as much as possible,i didn't say it boosts to the max...

The boost numbers vary from chip to chip even if the model number is the same.

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

my point is how much better does it preform stock under best conditions and overclocked? not much as intel's overclocked CPU, because the are basically in a way overclocking at stock settings.   

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, linustechtipscom said:

my point is how much better does it preform stock under best conditions and overclocked? not much as intel's overclocked CPU, because the are basically in a way overclocking at stock settings.   

  

Under the best conditions with non-exotic cooling you will get 400MHz-600MHz higher clock speeds than the base clock

A PC Enthusiast since 2011
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X@4.65GHz | GIGABYTE GTX 1660 GAMING OC @ Core 2085MHz Memory 5000MHz
Cinebench R23: 15669cb | Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×