Jump to content

Different CPU usage

so i was playing a game (Rocket League) and i exit and check my MSI afterburner stats and i see CPU1, 2 usage be around 30% and CPU4 -5 around 0-10%.

i heard some guy say in other threads that different usage means its bottlenecking? i have ryzen 5 2600 and RTX 2060

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

generally games use 1-4 cores they don't have to use ALL of them this isn't a bottleneck its game specific how many they use

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

A processor can be a bottleneck even if it's not maxed out in usage.

 

Being maxed in usage is just the easiest way to spot a bottleneck from it.

 

A Ryzen 5 2600 should be alright for a RTX 2060, It's considered a balanced system, now the Ryzen 5 2600 can still bottleneck a RTX 2060 if you'll go for 144hz reducing graphical settings, but I don't think this is the case here is it?

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

A processor can be a bottleneck even if it's not maxed out in usage.

 

Being maxed in usage is just the easiest way to spot a bottleneck from it.

 

A Ryzen 5 2600 should be alright for a RTX 2060, It's considered a balanced system, now the Ryzen 5 2600 can still bottleneck a RTX 2060 if you'll go for 144hz reducing graphical settings, but I don't think this is the case here is it?

Nope, i have 60hz monitor. i get around 300 fps on ultra in Rocket league but i play in comp settings which gives me 400-500 fps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then there's absolutely no reason to care, 500fps is already 440 more frames than your monitor can display per second xd.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Princess Cadence said:

Then there's absolutely no reason to care, 500fps is already 440 more frames than your monitor can display per second xd.

yeah 500 fps is more than enough but mostly my fps drops to 350-400 and makes my game feel laggy like 50 fps. thought it might be my CPU fault, realized today my friend with 1060 has around the same gpu usage as me (50-60%) but his spikes to 90% in most situtations to keep his fps consistent while mine is other way around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×