Jump to content

Michael Rahmani

Member
  • Posts

    146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to Sakkura in How many MS (or less than MS) of latency does a 10 foot DisplayPort cable add compared to a 6 foot?   
    A tiny fraction of a millisecond. Completely negligible.
  2. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to knightslugger in How many MS (or less than MS) of latency does a 10 foot DisplayPort cable add compared to a 6 foot?   
    well, depends on the velocity factor of the cable you're using. use that number to divide by the speed of light in a vacuum, and calculate how long it takes for the calibrated velocity of light through the cable to travel 2 feet.
     
    Just so you understand, this will be a purely academic discussion as the facts will plainly be evident. it will be to the -n'th power in fractional seconds.
  3. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to G27Racer_188 in How many MS (or less than MS) of latency does a 10 foot DisplayPort cable add compared to a 6 foot?   
    It will add latency that is only measurable with equipment that is at least 3000 times the price of that cable.
  4. Like
    Michael Rahmani got a reaction from McHox in How long does it take to get used to a new mouse sens?   
    Oh lol. I thought he meant a fifth of 1. Sorry!
  5. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to Nexxus in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI   
    The issue is when you are have 1 card those "toggleable physx settings" are going to put a massive strain on the 1 card since the card is pumping out the gfx and doing the phyx processing.
    In games without a togglable setting (project cars) the cpu handles phyx no matter if you are on nvidia or AMD gpus
    If you have 2 cards leaving it on auto is best but you would be better of setting it to gpu generally speaking.
  6. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to Daveeede in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI   
    The option to set it to the cpu is mainly for amd users i believe. But in most cases, as long as your cpu is not already bottlenecking the gpu, there shouldn't be much of a difference. 
     
    I take borderlands 2 as an example. I used to hover around 60 fps at 1440p ulta on my gtx 770. After switching to my r9 290 and setting the cpu to handle physx, I am getting close to 90 fps at 1440p ultra. And quality-wise I can't tell the difference.
  7. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to Enderman in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI   
    Physx is highly parallelized code which takes advantage of the thousands of cores inside a GPU
  8. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to Morpheus in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI   
    in theory gpu but the games that use physx optimize it so horribly i haven't noticed a big difference between cpu or gpu lol
  9. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to Demonking in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI   
    Hell no Ninja that shit works best on the GPU.
  10. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to harrynowl in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI   
    GPUs are much more powerful than CPUs.
     
    PhysX is designed/intended to be run on the GPU.
  11. Like
    Michael Rahmani got a reaction from Pretzel in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI   
    I'm curious to know if PhysX runs better on my GPU or CPU. A lot of people say if your CPU is more powerful than your GPU, then you should set it to the CPU. Meanwhile, other people say PhysX is designed for a GPU architecture, and if you set it to the CPU it will put a lot of unneeded strain on it. Does it even matter what you set it to?
     
    Thanks in advance!
  12. Like
    Michael Rahmani got a reaction from LeighPing in Does different thermal paste make a huge difference with temps of a CPU   
    Holy shit it worked! Back to 100 degrees! Thanks everyone for the help!
  13. Like
    Michael Rahmani reacted to whatthewhat in PC WONT TURN ON. HELP!   
    I don't really see why it matters, he needs help with his PC, he came here to get it.
  14. Like
    Michael Rahmani got a reaction from DavidHawk62 in Front fans intaking or exhausting?   
    Thanks for everyone's help! Front fans are intaking and back are exhausting now. GPU is WAY cooler.
×