-
Posts
146 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to Sakkura in How many MS (or less than MS) of latency does a 10 foot DisplayPort cable add compared to a 6 foot?
A tiny fraction of a millisecond. Completely negligible.
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to knightslugger in How many MS (or less than MS) of latency does a 10 foot DisplayPort cable add compared to a 6 foot?
well, depends on the velocity factor of the cable you're using. use that number to divide by the speed of light in a vacuum, and calculate how long it takes for the calibrated velocity of light through the cable to travel 2 feet.
Just so you understand, this will be a purely academic discussion as the facts will plainly be evident. it will be to the -n'th power in fractional seconds.
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to G27Racer_188 in How many MS (or less than MS) of latency does a 10 foot DisplayPort cable add compared to a 6 foot?
It will add latency that is only measurable with equipment that is at least 3000 times the price of that cable.
-
Michael Rahmani got a reaction from McHox in How long does it take to get used to a new mouse sens?
Oh lol. I thought he meant a fifth of 1. Sorry!
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to Nexxus in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI
The issue is when you are have 1 card those "toggleable physx settings" are going to put a massive strain on the 1 card since the card is pumping out the gfx and doing the phyx processing.
In games without a togglable setting (project cars) the cpu handles phyx no matter if you are on nvidia or AMD gpus
If you have 2 cards leaving it on auto is best but you would be better of setting it to gpu generally speaking.
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to Daveeede in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI
The option to set it to the cpu is mainly for amd users i believe. But in most cases, as long as your cpu is not already bottlenecking the gpu, there shouldn't be much of a difference.
I take borderlands 2 as an example. I used to hover around 60 fps at 1440p ulta on my gtx 770. After switching to my r9 290 and setting the cpu to handle physx, I am getting close to 90 fps at 1440p ultra. And quality-wise I can't tell the difference.
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to Enderman in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI
Physx is highly parallelized code which takes advantage of the thousands of cores inside a GPU
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to Morpheus in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI
in theory gpu but the games that use physx optimize it so horribly i haven't noticed a big difference between cpu or gpu lol
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to Demonking in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI
Hell no Ninja that shit works best on the GPU.
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to harrynowl in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI
GPUs are much more powerful than CPUs.
PhysX is designed/intended to be run on the GPU.
-
Michael Rahmani got a reaction from Pretzel in Does PhysX run better on a 4790K or 780TI
I'm curious to know if PhysX runs better on my GPU or CPU. A lot of people say if your CPU is more powerful than your GPU, then you should set it to the CPU. Meanwhile, other people say PhysX is designed for a GPU architecture, and if you set it to the CPU it will put a lot of unneeded strain on it. Does it even matter what you set it to?
Thanks in advance!
-
Michael Rahmani got a reaction from LeighPing in Does different thermal paste make a huge difference with temps of a CPU
Holy shit it worked! Back to 100 degrees! Thanks everyone for the help!
-
Michael Rahmani reacted to whatthewhat in PC WONT TURN ON. HELP!
I don't really see why it matters, he needs help with his PC, he came here to get it.
-
Michael Rahmani got a reaction from DavidHawk62 in Front fans intaking or exhausting?
Thanks for everyone's help! Front fans are intaking and back are exhausting now. GPU is WAY cooler.