unijab

Laughs in future

You mean.. GB?

Are you still playing this game? if you have plumbers you can extract the gas into bottles but thats isnt fast dumping it into space is an option or you could use a carbon skimmer to turn it into polluted water or you can feed it to slickters

pretty sure you'll have to pass each item/line to it at a time

Just ssh forward the port to your vps

unset my_array declare -a my_array my_array="" format () { my_array+=("element $1") } export -f format for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do format $x done echo ${my_array[*]}

Never was that true. You are confusing diff things.

Is there a reason AMD gpus can't be used with VR games?

Have you tried parsec gaming?

If you are using Linux and lvm, lvmcache is built in.

thats why it isnt working

Are they running

Proof?

I would go with something like.... Get a couple 9400-16i hbas. Get the u.2 cables that connect to the hba Then get the u.2 to m.2 adapters. Depending on your os and motherboard... Hot plug should work. even If not it should support 8-16 m.2 nvme drives

I avoid windows, so i dont use smb I use targetcli to export "luns" from my storage system to my proxmox system. I have sync=always and a ssd drive for slog. I max'd out ram on my motherboard so I dont have any l2arc configured. heres a recent fio test from within a VM with a lun passed thru. [root@cloud ~]# fio fiotest random-read: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 128KiB-128KiB, (W) 128KiB-128KiB, (T) 128KiB-128KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128 fio-3.7 Starting 1 process random-read: Laying out IO file (1 file / 6144MiB) Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)][100.0%][r=1819MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=14.6k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] random-read: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=25162: Tue Feb 18 21:21:34 2020 read: IOPS=14.5k, BW=1807MiB/s (1895MB/s)(106GiB/60008msec) slat (usec): min=5, max=2299, avg=15.85, stdev=32.80 clat (usec): min=992, max=196194, avg=8836.29, stdev=4824.39 lat (usec): min=1005, max=196203, avg=8852.70, stdev=4824.48 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 3], 5.00th=[ 4], 10.00th=[ 4], 20.00th=[ 5], | 30.00th=[ 7], 40.00th=[ 8], 50.00th=[ 9], 60.00th=[ 10], | 70.00th=[ 11], 80.00th=[ 13], 90.00th=[ 14], 95.00th=[ 15], | 99.00th=[ 24], 99.50th=[ 32], 99.90th=[ 50], 99.95th=[ 57], | 99.99th=[ 127] bw ( MiB/s): min= 1317, max= 1823, per=99.99%, avg=1806.64, stdev=57.49, samples=120 iops : min=10540, max=14586, avg=14453.10, stdev=459.91, samples=120 lat (usec) : 1000=0.01% lat (msec) : 2=0.76%, 4=11.95%, 10=49.58%, 20=36.30%, 50=1.32% lat (msec) : 100=0.08%, 250=0.01% cpu : usr=4.31%, sys=33.53%, ctx=248022, majf=0, minf=44 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1% issued rwts: total=867358,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=128 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: bw=1807MiB/s (1895MB/s), 1807MiB/s-1807MiB/s (1895MB/s-1895MB/s), io=106GiB (114GB), run=60008-60008msec Disk stats (read/write): dm-2: ios=864084/2, merge=0/0, ticks=7528663/8, in_queue=7529636, util=99.88%, aggrios=867359/3, aggrmerge=0/0, aggrticks=7558274/8, aggrin_queue=7558127, aggrutil=99.85% sdb: ios=867359/3, merge=0/0, ticks=7558274/8, in_queue=7558127, util=99.85%

just zfs set sync=always dataset/name

> had a ending already wrote up... assuming

what ever is cheapest with the warranty period you are happy with.

both chips have the same power draw limits. any gains IMO are pretty neat when you consider 32 vs 64 cores using the same power draw.

optane is not NAND optane is 3d xpoint in the video; they said AMD said not to use it (reading b/t the lines..... b/c its an INTEL product)

mostly mis information the chipset limitation on intel is only if you were going to use it for the drive caching shit they offered (i forgot the name) optane memory is also just an ssd (limited to pcie x2 lanes) they can run in any m.2 slot that supports nvme.

no optane memory was just a marketing stunt intel pulled for launch. (imo b/c the drives were so small (16GB or 32GB) that you couldnt install a windows OS on it directly) They are just small SSDs I know many people that use them for freenas or vmware boot drives.

actually they are slower in peak bandwidth compared to a handful of other top end NVME ssds. Optane has low access latency which gives them better IOPs at lower queue depths

Yes No optane SSDs are just SSD drives

I've had luck renaming the vmdk files to dot raw and using them with proxmox.