Jump to content
9 minutes ago, hutechtips said:

Just curious, what's the best cpu for overclocking? Like if you were given the challenge of achieving the highest clockspeed with a CPU using a consumer water cooler, what CPU would you get?

realisticly if your just asking to know what cpu you can overclock to a really high mhz or what ever.. just get a higher end cpu, its not worth the unstableness of overclocking just for the slightly cheaper price.. 

If my Response helped you, Please click the Check under my reply, to mark it as The Solution!

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LamoidZombieDog said:

realisticly if your just asking to know what cpu you can overclock to a really high mhz or what ever.. just get a higher end cpu, its not worth the unstableness of overclocking just for the slightly cheaper price.. 

I'm not looking for a cheaper cpu... I'm looking at overclocking because you're able to achieve clockspeeds that normal cpus won't go to... plus overclocking is relatively stable, especially when manufacturers are supporting it. The only thing you're sacrificing is the lifespan of the cpu, but if you're a person who's looking for high clockspeeds, you'll always want the newest technology, so that isn't even a concern.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, hutechtips said:

 Like if you were given the challenge of achieving the highest clockspeed with a CPU using a consumer water cooler, what CPU would you get?

If what you are interested in is the highest you can go on a consumer water cooler, and nothing else, then probably an FX CPU, probably better if it's a low core-count part. Which, frankly, says something about your question.

 

1 hour ago, hutechtips said:

 I'm looking at overclocking because you're able to achieve clockspeeds that normal cpus won't go to

Well, by definition, yes.

1 hour ago, hutechtips said:

... plus overclocking is relatively stable, especially when manufacturers are supporting it.

Manufacturers may provide you with the option to change the settings of a product, but it doesn't mean the product will work with whatever combination of settings. Overclocking, especially if going for the highest clocks possible, will always put you at the edge of instability. Otherwise, it wouldn't be the "highest clock possible" for that CPU.

 

1 hour ago, hutechtips said:

but if you're a person who's looking for high clockspeeds, you'll always want the newest technology,

Not necessarily, those are two different things. As illustrated by this thread, and my initial reply to your question.

A Ryzen CPU is newer and better than an FX CPU, but it won't clock as high, it won't even overclock by the same percentage

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, hutechtips said:

Just curious, what's the best cpu for overclocking? Like if you were given the challenge of achieving the highest clockspeed with a CPU using a consumer water cooler, what CPU would you get?

it depends whether you are trying to get the best single core cinebench score or multi-core, or is it just a pure record you can get in terms of ghz? anyway u can find the results by simply googling.

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, SpaceGhostC2C said:

If what you are interested in is the highest you can go on a consumer water cooler, and nothing else, then probably an FX CPU, probably better if it's a low core-count part. Which, frankly, says something about your question.

 

Well, by definition, yes.

Manufacturers may provide you with the option to change the settings of a product, but it doesn't mean the product will work with whatever combination of settings. Overclocking, especially if going for the highest clocks possible, will always put you at the edge of instability. Otherwise, it wouldn't be the "highest clock possible" for that CPU.

 

Not necessarily, those are two different things. As illustrated by this thread, and my initial reply to your question.

A Ryzen CPU is newer and better than an FX CPU, but it won't clock as high, it won't even overclock by the same percentage

 

Is it the FX CPU? I've looked online, and it seems that FX CPU's can only achieve a clockspeed of around 4.8-5.0 ghz, which current high-end CPUs can achieve pretty easily with a water cooler. When I talk about the "highest clockspeed" I mean within reason; obviously if the pc crashes every time you open an application, it's not a working overclock. Also why are you only considering AMD CPUs? To my current knowledge, Intel CPUs can overclock the highest right now and the newest Intel CPUs are arguably the best at that. And its not about the percentage of overclock increase, its the highest ghz a stable clockspeed could achieve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, xg32 said:

it depends whether you are trying to get the best single core cinebench score or multi-core, or is it just a pure record you can get in terms of ghz? anyway u can find the results by simply googling.

Not to set a record, you would do exotic cooling if you wanted that, I mean in general; if you were wanting a PC with a high clockspeed, what CPU would you buy. And from googling, I can tell you that I can't find anything that gives a definitive answer for the CPU with the highest stable overclock, which is why I'm asking on the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, hutechtips said:

Is it the FX CPU? I've looked online, and it seems that FX CPU's can only achieve a clockspeed of around 4.8-5.0 ghz, which current high-end CPUs can achieve pretty easily with a water cooler.

Not on consumer water cooler, but on custom loops.

 

48 minutes ago, hutechtips said:

Also why are you only considering AMD CPUs?

Where do you get I'm only considering AMD CPUs? My initial response was an AMD CPU, because that's the CPU that will clock the highest on consumer coolers, and the record-holder for clocks on exotic cooling.

Then I compared to current AMD CPUs because they are particularly limited in overclocking, hence that's the starkest contrast I could think of in terms of overclocking high vs actually performing better.

 

48 minutes ago, hutechtips said:

To my current knowledge, Intel CPUs can overclock the highest right now and the newest Intel CPUs are arguably the best at that.

So you already know the answer to your own question? Why start this thread then?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, SpaceGhostC2C said:

Not on consumer water cooler, but on custom loops.

 

Where do you get I'm only considering AMD CPUs? My initial response was an AMD CPU, because that's the CPU that will clock the highest on consumer coolers, and the record-holder for clocks on exotic cooling.

Then I compared to current AMD CPUs because they are particularly limited in overclocking, hence that's the starkest contrast I could think of in terms of overclocking high vs actually performing better.

 

So you already know the answer to your own question? Why start this thread then?

 

Yes on consumer water coolers, you can get a i7-8700k to 5.0 ghz relatively easily with a consumer water cooler. I didn't know the fx series were really good at overclocking, thank you for bringing that to my attention. I assumed Intel CPUs were the best at overclocking, but I didn't know for sure and didn't know which specific model.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×