Jump to content

Hey,
So my local hardware store is having some promotions this weekend and I got a doubt to ask the experts of the community.

 

My current setup has:

Intel® Core™ i9-7900X (13.75M Cache, 4.30 GHz)
Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

2x G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200MHz CL14 (F4-3200C14D-16GTZR)

I was hoping to improve my System from 32GB (4x 8GB) to 64 GB, but the "F4-3200C14D-16GTZR" kit is always selling about 260 EUR (so 520 EUR total).
Today I saw a promotion on "G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200MHz CL16" (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR).

 

As far is I know, the only difference is between CL14 (14-14-14-34-2N) and CL16 (16-18-18-38-2N).

And the CL16 is seeling about 170 EUR (340 EUR total)

Would it make it a noticible inpact on my performance?

Regards!

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/967255-doubts-about-different-cl-ram/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. why do you even need so much RAM?

 

2. The performance difference wont be noticeable with XMP profile, but further overclocking could be affected. 3200MHz CL16 kits are often using Hynix MFR/AFR dies which do not overclock as well as Samsung B-dioe found in 3200MHz CL14. Those are the worst Samsung B-die btw, but still better than Hynix stuff.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Short answer: no. Long answer: It largely depends on what you do, but CL is latency. Higher latency = slower ram. If you are doing intense professional video editing, you'll probably see some sort of difference between the two. It's a very small difference, but still might be noticeable depending on what you do. You can also overclock the slower ram to have faster timings. Ultimately, if you have money to blow, the obviously get the more expensive one, but if you're strapped for cash, get the cheaper one. 

print "Hello World!" ("Hello World!")

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Honestly, is more to get all of the ram slots populated with those sweet RGB lights :P

Besides that, I work with databases (MySQL), Adobe Premiere (Video Edit & Export) a bit of Cinema 4D / 3DS Max and Gaming.

 

And I don't really intend to overclock the RAM, never had the need for that.

 

Considering all of this information, is better to buy the cheaper one (using XMP) and save the 180 EUR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×