thinking of getting the ryzan 1950x

[orze]

so i got big problems wiht my current mother baord and gave up on saving it.

im gona go for a ryzan build given allot of good feedback i see.

im a grphical desginer and work with editing videos too allot.

and i was told that the 1950 is a great platform and honstly given i wanted the 1920 before it and the diffrnce is minimal price wise.

should i go for it?

 

should i go for somthing smaller?

im looking for the best editing and working pc.

the catch is. i love video games. and i would want to play anything i can.

i got a 1080 and good ram i should be good there.

 

so will the 1950 with is many cores do good for gaming too?.

or should i go for a middle point.

[EPPHO]

Gaming on Threadripper is great, no worries.

[FloRolf]

Well if your intend was just gaming i wouldnt go for the Ryzen, but as you mainly do your Photo and Video editing, the TR will be awesome for both.

[orze]

2 hours ago, FloRolf said:

Well if your intend was just gaming i wouldnt go for the Ryzen, but as you mainly do your Photo and Video editing, the TR will be awesome for both.

thats good to hear. is there a point going for the 16 core 1950x.

or the 1920x or 1900x would work?

[FloRolf]

3 minutes ago, orze said:

thats good to hear. is there a point going for the 16 core 1950x.

or the 1920x or 1900x would work?

depends on your work. If your programms utilize all cores perfectly,

the 1950X is about 30% faster than the 1920X, which is about 50% faster than the 1900X.

[orze]

18 hours ago, FloRolf said:

depends on your work. If your programms utilize all cores perfectly,

the 1950X is about 30% faster than the 1920X, which is about 50% faster than the 1900X.

i got no clue if they do....i mean video games clearly dont. but ill give my gess it will do fine wan it gets to gaming

wan it gets to progrems i use stuff like sony vegas and after effect for video

and maya for 3d i work on.

i also use photoshop but ill gess it wont change allot there