Verbose Benchmark Data?

[DarkSwordsman]

Does LMG supply any database or something of their benchmark data for videos?

 

I've always taken their graphs and information in videos fairly seriously because I feel that I can trust them, but at many levels it's not very reliable if there isn't specific data for it.

 

I'm guessing they at least have some data written in various ways for internal use to provide consistency.

[GoldenLag]

15 hours ago, The Dark Swordsman said:

Does LMG supply any database or something of their benchmark data for videos?

 

I've always taken their graphs and information in videos fairly seriously because I feel that I can trust them, but at many levels it's not very reliable if there isn't specific data for it.

 

I'm guessing they at least have some data written in various ways for internal use to provide consistency.

Be carefull of overclocking data on review samples. There are indications that point to the chips they recieve as being golden samples. That the chips are in the top 3% of shelf chips. 

 

But yes i think LMG should have an archive for benchmark data. However Cpu benchmark sort of allready has this, and keeping tests consistent over a longer period can be hard

[LogicalDrm]

They don't. They used to have some long time ago. But as they are doing very limited comparisons, usually only among same generation or maybe compared to last, I don't even see point. I haven't never have so much trust on graphs in video overviews. Good written reviews by Anandtech, OC3D and such are much better and their graphs have several generations, or as many as can be shown with minimal hardware changes.

 

If you want OC database, forum one is quite extensive:

Or with GPU

 

Plus benchmarking databases under both subsections.