Jump to content

RAM Disk?

Hello,

 

My SSD has a read/write speed of 550/250 in CrystalDiskMark Seq read. Made a RAM Disk and got read/write speeds of 7500/7900 mb/s. I have 32GB of RAM, now to the question. I was thinking of putting chrome + download location to the RAM Disk for max speeds. Will I notice any difference at all with having all browser/download related on a RAM Disk? I know about it getting wiped after shutdown & I also know that it can be saved on regular SATA disks after shutdown, but with longer shutdown/boot times. I don't do any form of editing, copying of files and don't have enough memory to save games on a RAM Disk. Is it worth to have a RAM Disk for browser/downloads? :P

Main:  1650 v2   @ 4,6GHz   -   X79 Deluxe                -   GTX 1080 @ 2000MHz   -   24GB DDR3 @ 2400MHz / CL10

Side:   i7-4790K @ 4,5GHz   -   Maximus 7 Hero        -   GTX 1070 @ 2114MHz    -  16GB DDR3 @ 2666MHz / CL12

 

HWBOT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you need a browser on a RAM disk? That seems pretty pointless to me. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you've got an internet connection that can outpace your SSD (which you won't have), having downloads on a RAMDisk will have no benefit. Having the browser on the RAM disk might make it launch a little faster, but will make basically no difference otherwise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Jamiec1130 said:

Why do you need a browser on a RAM disk? That seems pretty pointless to me. 

That's why I'm asking :P
Will I notice any difference in browing/downloads? Browsers cache??

Main:  1650 v2   @ 4,6GHz   -   X79 Deluxe                -   GTX 1080 @ 2000MHz   -   24GB DDR3 @ 2400MHz / CL10

Side:   i7-4790K @ 4,5GHz   -   Maximus 7 Hero        -   GTX 1070 @ 2114MHz    -  16GB DDR3 @ 2666MHz / CL12

 

HWBOT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Tech Wizard said:

That's why I'm asking :P
Will I notice any difference in browing/downloads? Browsers cache??

Browsing would be limited by your network speed. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Oshino Shinobu said:

Unless you've got an internet connection that can outpace your SSD (which you won't have), having downloads on a RAMDisk will have no benefit. Having the browser on the RAM disk might make it launch a little faster, but will make basically no difference otherwise. 

lol.thumb.png.19e4770feb66f434df9a6591f65f7272.png

Main:  1650 v2   @ 4,6GHz   -   X79 Deluxe                -   GTX 1080 @ 2000MHz   -   24GB DDR3 @ 2400MHz / CL10

Side:   i7-4790K @ 4,5GHz   -   Maximus 7 Hero        -   GTX 1070 @ 2114MHz    -  16GB DDR3 @ 2666MHz / CL12

 

HWBOT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jamiec1130 said:

Browsing would be limited by your network speed. 

Just now, Oshino Shinobu said:

Yeah, not even close to your SSD's speeds...

Well, rip RAM Disks for my part. Would have been fun to store games on a RAM Disk if I had enough. Was at least fun to compare regular SSD read/writes with my RAM :D
Ty for your help lads

 

Main:  1650 v2   @ 4,6GHz   -   X79 Deluxe                -   GTX 1080 @ 2000MHz   -   24GB DDR3 @ 2400MHz / CL10

Side:   i7-4790K @ 4,5GHz   -   Maximus 7 Hero        -   GTX 1070 @ 2114MHz    -  16GB DDR3 @ 2666MHz / CL12

 

HWBOT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tech Wizard said:

Well, rip RAM Disks for my part. Would have been fun to store games on a RAM Disk if I had enough. Was at least fun to compare regular SSD read/writes with my RAM :D
Ty for your help lads

 

If you have RAM to spare, you could look into RAM caching instead, though there's not too many applications that benefit a lot from that either. 

 

There's not many situations where a RAMDisk is practical, it's just mostly fast on paper but comes with a load of downsides and few real world benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tech Wizard said:

Well, rip RAM Disks for my part. Would have been fun to store games on a RAM Disk if I had enough. Was at least fun to compare regular SSD read/writes with my RAM :D
Ty for your help lads

A RAM disk wouldn't really help either. Application loading performance levels off after SATA SSD speeds.

 

Keep in mind that application "loading" isn't just moving data from storage to RAM. It includes initializing the application, which is dependent on how fast your CPU runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wont get any improvement moving chrome installation folder to ramdisk.

You will need to move Chrome cache folder / browser data to the ram disk as well.

After the program is fired, the installation folder wont be needed to run the program, as all the executable already in the memory.

The program will read and write to the cache folder. That's where you need high IO speed.

Each program installed in 3 different folder :

- C: Programfiles - for fixed executables
- C: ProgramData - for installers, updates etc

- User / AppData - for user settings and program caches

Anyway, chrome is not a high bandwidth program, it won't benefit the ramdisk speed.

Ramdisk is good for high productivity like video editing and 3d rendering.

 

Now about the slow download.

You have a gigabit internet connection, and you must be expecting 1000mbps speed for every download.

Well, it doesn't work that way.

The gigabit speed is only applied from your computer to your ISP.

The ISP then connects you to what ever website you want.

The problem is, not every website server has a gigabit connections to your ISP.

Plus they serve the website not only to you, you must share whatever maximum bandwidth that they have with other users.

So if they have like 10gbps connections and 1000 users online, then theoretically you will only gets like 10mbps.

Plus there's more factors involved like server location, ping, latency etc.

 

So how you can benefit from having a gigabit connections?

Download 100 files at the same time from 100 different websites at 10mbps each.

Ryzen 5700g @ 4.4ghz all cores | Asrock B550M Steel Legend | 3060 | 2x 16gb Micron E 2666 @ 4200mhz cl16 | 500gb WD SN750 | 12 TB HDD | Deepcool Gammax 400 w/ 2 delta 4000rpm push pull | Antec Neo Eco Zen 500w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×