Jump to content

Hello everyone,

I'm EvESpirit, I'm new here. (17, F, Europe), so sorry if this is supposed to go in another section. Could someone plese help me? I just ordered a used Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, and I am just confused at what did I find out so far. I originally bought it for my dad, which needs a computer for not much except browsing and a stupid Flash-based game.

 

My question is: Is the Q6600 faster in games than my current A4-7300 is? I have already looked online but I am just confused. If it is, i'll just take the board along with cooler and processor and just swap it out for my current. Yes, I am going to use it with a discrete GPU, more specifically the 1GB GTX 650. (Go ahead and laugh, I heard all the jokes.). My question also is, what is the best GPU for the Q6600 to make a balanced system? (Doesen't matter if it's overkill for my dad, I'll be using it every now and then too.)

 

Thanks to everybody who helps ^•^

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/765134-low-end-cpu-comparison-needed-upgrade-path/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The q6600 has great potential when overclocked so i suggest (if you have a nice aircooler on it) to overclock it.

 

GPU wise, i would say the HD6950 or HD7870 is a nice balanced gpu, more gpu power would rarely be utilized because the cpu won't keep up.

If you want my attention, quote meh! D: or just stick an @samcool55 in your post :3

Spying on everyone to fight against terrorism is like shooting a mosquito with a cannon

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, samcool55 said:

The q6600 has great potential when overclocked so i suggest (if you have a nice aircooler on it) to overclock it.

 

GPU wise, i would say the HD6950 or HD7870 is a nice balanced gpu, more gpu power would rarely be utilized because the cpu won't keep up.

Well, thank you, but that's all pointless if it's not better than the a4-7300.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, EvESpirit said:

Well, thank you, but that's all pointless if it's not better than the a4-7300.

Run cinebench on both systems :P That should give you some idea how much raw cpu power both have.

My guess is that an overclock on the q6600 will make it faster than the A4. 

If you want my attention, quote meh! D: or just stick an @samcool55 in your post :3

Spying on everyone to fight against terrorism is like shooting a mosquito with a cannon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your A4-7300 is much stronger in single threaded performance 

 

Multi threaded the perform about the same, maybe the Q6600 being marginally faster

 

I'd keep the A4 unless your games really require those 2 extra threads

System specs:

4790k

GTX 1050

16GB DDR3

Samsung evo SSD

a few HDD's

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am unfortunately unable to bench the systems as I do not yet have the Q6600 in my hands. And I'd like to ask if you're just not writing out to me the benchmarks like gamedebate etc. from google, as I've read those, I need real life game perf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For starters, the AMD CPU is much newer and operates at a much higher frequency and have a comparable IPC to Sandy bridge (probably slightly slower)

 

Cinebench single.core results of the q6600 is usually around 50 and the a4-7300 is about 80

System specs:

4790k

GTX 1050

16GB DDR3

Samsung evo SSD

a few HDD's

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Terryv said:

For starters, the AMD CPU is much newer and operates at a much higher frequency and have a comparable IPC to Sandy bridge (probably slightly slower)

 

Cinebench single.core results of the q6600 is usually around 50 and the a4-7300 is about 80

Okay. Thanks to everyone who responded ^^ Appreciate your time. Thank you for helping me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×