Jump to content

Dual Cores in 2017

Do you think dual Cores should still exist in 2017, even with hyperthreading? It seems these days even web browsers are starting to take advantage of multicore CPUs. So do you think in this day and age dual cores are just passed due to be phased out, especially with Ryzen?

 

 

Move this thread if need be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dual core will have its place for years to come in light load applications.

Would I buy one?

Only for a home theater PC or a small home server.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dual cores still have a place. Arguably single cores still have a place if they existed. You don't need more than one for web browsing, playing music or word processing.

CPU i7 6700 Cooling Cryorig H7 Motherboard MSI H110i Pro AC RAM Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 2133 GPU Pulse RX 5700 XT Case Fractal Design Define Mini C Storage Trascend SSD370S 256GB + WD Black 320GB + Sandisk Ultra II 480GB + WD Blue 1TB PSU EVGA GS 550 Display Nixeus Vue24B FreeSync 144 Hz Monitor (VESA mounted) Keyboard Aorus K3 Mechanical Keyboard Mouse Logitech G402 OS Windows 10 Home 64 bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dual cores will definitely still exist.

 

Maybe not in PCs but smaller portable elctronics where power consumption and cpu die size really matters and not so much multitasking, will continue to use dual or even single cores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

But even those small electronics like phones tablets and even routers are starting to switch to multicore products, Silicon should be so cheap by now that Dual cores shouldn't be a serious contender in the pc market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, alexcheetah said:

But even those small electronics like phones tablets and even routers are starting to switch to multicore products, Silicon should be so cheap by now that Dual cores shouldn't be a serious contender in the pc market.

ARM multiple cores =/= x86 multiple cores

 

A) ARM has better hotplugging to allow disabling cores on the fly when not in use.

 

B) ARM doesn't do dynamic clocking the same way x86 does unless you have custom chips like Qualcomm's and Nvidia's. Therefore BIG.little with hotplugging is the only way to get big power savings and have good performance without much more expensive chips.

 

C) on ARM makes things like SMT and other instruction per clock optimizations are harder, giving Intel (and now AMD) a massive edge on per core performance.

 

D) ARM cores are much cheaper to produce en masse than x86 cores due to their RISC nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using a dualcore in my HTPC, where it's perfectly fit for purpose (bearing in mind that system does have a discrete GPU to take care of H264 decoding), so I'd say they've still got a future for such use-cases.

Main Rig "Melanie" (click!) -- AMD Ryzen7 1800X • Gigabyte Aorus X370-Gaming 5 • 3x G.SKILL TridentZ 3200 8GB • Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming • Corsair RM750x • Phanteks Enthoo Pro --

HTPC "Keira" -- AMD Sempron 2650 • MSI AM1I • 2x Kingston HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 8GB • ASUS ENGTX 560Ti • Corsair SF450 • Phanteks Enthoo EVOLV Shift --

Laptop "Abbey" -- AMD E-350 • HP 646982-001 • 1x Samsung DDR3 1333 4GB • AMD Radeon HD 6310 • HP MU06 Notebook Battery • HP 635 case --

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×