For Honor Benchmarks - Finally a well-optimized Ubisoft game?

[Morgan MLGman]

A very reputable Polish site did benchmarks of For Honor using many different last-gen and current-gen GPUs, the game seems to be suprisingly well-optimized for a Ubisoft title.

 

Here we see the RX 480 slightly ahead of the 1060. Note how well the R9 Fury performs considering its current price (247$ after a rebate: http://pcpartpicker.com/product/M2mxFT/sapphire-video-card-112470340g).

This was tested on latest drivers with GPU Boost enabled on Nvidia cards.

 

1080p Ultra settings:

 

 

1440p Ultra settings:

 

 

4K High settings:

 

What do you think? Did the results suprise you? Comment down below.

 

Full review link (in Polish): https://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficzne/test_wydajnosci_for_honor_pc_optymalizacja_punkt_honoru?page=0,1

[Guest]

No Titan X Pascal? I know that 1080 already breaks the 60 fps mark at 4K

[Morgan MLGman]

2 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

No Titan X Pascal? I know that 1080 already breaks the 60 fps mark at 4K

Probably didn't have the card at hand, and considering that it's a Polish site I wouldn't expect them to, cause this card is so expensive here it's ridiculous

[xAcid9]

Pretty games, not sure if i should buy it now or wait for sale since i only want to play SP.

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Morgan MLGman said:

Probably didn't have the card at hand, and considering that it's a Polish site I wouldn't expect them to, cause this card is so expensive here it's ridiculous

That 59 fps for RX 480 and 1060 bugs my eyes so much at 1080p

[Princess Luna]

Honestly I have lost faith in Ubisoft after Splinter Cell franchise died and AC Unity was regrettable... Not to mention the joke of WD...

 

I haven't bought a game from them in a while and I plan in keep it that way... enough with those E3 false advertising, weak games... bad ports... and so on.

Nonetheless it is nice to see they finally optimized a game for once, seems my Titan X will handle it sweetly but like I said I am very uninterested on their titles, maybe I'll check it out in 2018's sales.

@xAcid9 Yes I also used to play their games solely for the campaign, well AC never had a strong multiplayer to begin with... Feels like it isn't a good deal regardless... Ubisoft has been too crappy for too long now, lost me as a costumer.

[ivan134]

My theory that the 470 would overtake the 390 is slowly coming true. That is one of the best bang 4 buck cards in years.

[Morgan MLGman]

1 hour ago, ivan134 said:

My theory that the 470 would overtake the 390 is slowly coming true. That is one of the best bang 4 buck cards in years.

True, the 970 just doesn't "survive" aging. A 290 performs pretty much the same now while being much older... the RX 470 is a great deal atm, especially when paired with the Pentium G4560, it's the best price/performance entry-level gaming combo atm imho.

 

Though as I mentioned in the thread, look how the R9 Fury performs, it's like 247$ atm on pcpartpicker... I recently heard "Fiji sucks" a few times etc, well RIP Note that Nvidia GPUs in the test had GPU Boost turned on, the Fury was tested at 1000MHz only... Mine is 1150