Jump to content

AMD solves R9 290 throttling problem with a new driver

Mo5

According to ExtremeTech some R9 290 cards were experiencing overheating and thus throttling due to fan control problem. AMD solved the problem with a driver update.

 

 

 

According to AMD, the problem was caused by improper fan settings on retail cards and imprecise tuning that relied on power modulation (PWM) rather than a specified RPM speed. As a result, the company said, some retail cards that were supposed to be spinning at 47% were actually spinning as much as 350 RPM slower — thus causing the overheat issue. Last night the company pushed a new driver that would supposedly fix this by relying on RPM tuning to set fan speeds rather than PWM manipulation.

 

Source: http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/170636-well-that-was-quick-amd-solves-r9-290-throttling-problem-with-a-new-driver

Asrock 890GX Extreme 3 - AMD Phenom II X4 955 @3.50GHz - Arctic Cooling Freezer XTREME Rev.2 - 4GB Kingston HyperX - AMD Radeon HD7850 - Kingston V300 240GB - Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB - Chieftec APS-750 - Cooler Master HAF912 PLUS


osu! profile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to ExtremeTech some R9 290 cards were experiencing overheating and thus throttling due to fan control problem. AMD solved the problem with a driver update.

 

 

Source: http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/170636-well-that-was-quick-amd-solves-r9-290-throttling-problem-with-a-new-driver

Good to see AMD releasing updates fast enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome, even more noise.

It's really not understandable why AMD doesn't let aftermarket coolers to come out.

System:
4670k@4,7Ghz <fully stable ( and 5Ghz, incredible unstable)| Asus Maximus VI Hero | G.Skill TridentX 16GB 2400Mhz C10 | AMD XFX R9 290 OC'ed (locked, Elpida) Cooled by a Kraken G10&X40 w/ NF-A14 | NZXT Phantom 530 | 2TB Seagate Barracuda | Samsung EVO 250GB | Cooler Master V850 | QNIX QX2710 @110Hz | Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2 | Ducky Shine 3 ^^ | Madcatz R.A.T. 5 | Brainwavz Delta's |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

PWM stands for pulse-width modulation.

 

Spoiler

CPU:Intel Xeon X5660 @ 4.2 GHz RAM:6x2 GB 1600MHz DDR3 MB:Asus P6T Deluxe GPU:Asus GTX 660 TI OC Cooler:Akasa Nero 3


SSD:OCZ Vertex 3 120 GB HDD:2x640 GB WD Black Fans:2xCorsair AF 120 PSU:Seasonic 450 W 80+ Case:Thermaltake Xaser VI MX OS:Windows 10
Speakers:Altec Lansing MX5021 Keyboard:Razer Blackwidow 2013 Mouse:Logitech MX Master Monitor:Dell U2412M Headphones: Logitech G430

Big thanks to Damikiller37 for making me an awesome Intel 4004 out of trixels!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome, even more noise.

It's really not understandable why AMD doesn't let aftermarket coolers to come out.

 

The, at most, 350RPM difference won't significantly increase noise.

 

Why do you assume they're not "letting" coolers come out? Stock on the cards is still low across the board. AIBs don't have enough chips to fulfill orders of stock cards much less magically conjure up more supply for multiple 290 and 290X SKUs. I'd like to remind you that the 290 and 290X are using the same chip, they are both eating into a very finite amount of supply at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome, even more noise.t.

 

You read my mind!

In case the moderators do not ban me as requested, this is a notice that I have left and am not coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will this have any effect on the benchmarks slick did?  given that he pushed the card as hard as he could, would the old driver had held back the OC at all? 

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will this have any effect on the benchmarks slick did?  given that he pushed the card as hard as he could, would the old driver had held back the OC at all? 

As long as he turned the max fan speed up when he overclocked it the numbers should be the same.

 

Edit: the Google Doc says that he did turn the fan speed up, so yeah, no change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×