Jump to content

is freesync noticeable in 1080p ~25" screens

allenfaust

Hi!

 

Planning to buy a monitor for my upcoming pc build which uses an RX 480

 

I am considering monitors in the $150-200 price range of 1080p (most likely 23-25"). I am wondering if the freesync feature is a noticeable feature in this kind of setup 'cuz some monitors with a smaller screen (w/freesync) goes for the same price similar to one with a larder one (no freesync).

 

main dilemma: smaller screen with freesync vs larger screen without freesync for 1080p gaming

 

 

Thanks!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, allenfaust said:

Hi!

 

Planning to buy a monitor for my upcoming pc build which uses an RX 480

 

I am considering monitors in the $150-200 price range of 1080p (most likely 23-25"). I am wondering if the freesync feature is a noticeable feature in this kind of setup 'cuz some monitors with a smaller screen (w/freesync) goes for the same price similar to one with a larder one (no freesync).

 

main dilemma: smaller screen with freesync vs larger screen without freesync for 1080p gaming

 

 

Thanks!

 

 

http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-25UM58-P-ultrawide-monitor

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually saw that but was actually thinking of getting either of these 3, 

 

http://www.lg.com/uk/monitors/lg-23MP68VQ-P ---- freesync, ips, 75 hz, 23"

 

http://www.samsung.com/nz/monitors/curved-cf390/  --- freesync, va, 24" , curved, cant find refresh rate

http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-25UM58-P-ultrawide-monitor --- ultrawide, 25", IPS, cant find refresh rate

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aereldor said:

I actually saw that but wasn't really a fan of that looks. I was actually thinking of getting either of these 3, 

 

http://www.lg.com/uk/monitors/lg-23MP68VQ-P ---- freesync, ips, 75 hz, 23"

 

http://www.samsung.com/nz/monitors/curved-cf390/  --- freesync, va, 24" , curved, cant find refresh rate

http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-25UM58-P-ultrawide-monitor --- ultrawide, 25", IPS, cant find refresh rate

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

I would like to ask, will hdmi 2.0 be able to handle more than 60 fps ??

 

i saw some article saying that hdmi 2.0 has a limit of 60 fps (so if u have 75 Hz monitor, it can only give 60 fps). OR was that for a different higher resolution ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, allenfaust said:

I would like to ask, will hdmi 2.0 be able to handle more than 60 fps ??

 

i saw some article saying that hdmi 2.0 has a limit of 60 fps (so if u have 75 Hz monitor, it can only give 60 fps). OR was that for a different higher resolution ?

you'll be fine you would have to worry with it if you were going 120/144hz

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Princess Cadence said:

you'll be fine you would have to worry with it if you were going 120/144hz

May I ask what you think on the monitors i presented above ? though i would like to buy the ultrawide montor, im a bit reluctant due to the desk space I Have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, allenfaust said:

May I ask what you think on the monitors i presented above ? though i would like to buy the ultrawide montor, im a bit reluctant due to the desk space I Have. 

All of those are good picks, the samsung curved one seems neat... however after I used ultra-wide 21:9 I simply refuse going back to the normal 16:9... it greatly improved my desktop experience.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Princess Cadence said:

All of those are good picks, the samsung curved one seems neat... however after I used ultra-wide 21:9 I simply refuse going back to the normal 16:9... it greatly improved my desktop experience.

Even for gaming ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, allenfaust said:

Even for gaming ?

Especially for gaming, 75hz already is a boost from 60hz and the higher resolution allied to the IPS superiority in colours and over all image quality makes any game experience more enjoyable... then again I play more single player campaigns than competitive high paced E-sports where high refresh rates of 144hz makes a difference...

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

Especially for gaming, 75hz already is a boost from 60hz and the higher resolution allied to the IPS superiority in colours and over all image quality makes any game experience more enjoyable... then again I play more single player campaigns than competitive high paced E-sports where high refresh rates of 144hz makes a difference...

What about the freesync (i see your suggestion has an adaptive sync)? have you encountered there broken frames? Also won't the gpu be more stressed with a larger screen ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, allenfaust said:

What about the freesync (i see your suggestion has an adaptive sync)? have you encountered there broken frames? Also won't the gpu be more stressed with a larger screen ?

The size of the screen itself does not matter, it is the resolution that matters, with the RX 480 you can use Free Sync on it just fine, the 2560x1080p is more demanding than 1920x1080p however not by too much, a single RX 480 would still be quite capable, provided that it is the 8gb model since the higher the resolution the more vram you will use.

 

In my case though I use a nVidia so I can't use the Free Sync however V-Sync at the 75hz has always made my games smooth enough with no stuttering.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, allenfaust said:

I would like to ask, will hdmi 2.0 be able to handle more than 60 fps ??

 

i saw some article saying that hdmi 2.0 has a limit of 60 fps (so if u have 75 Hz monitor, it can only give 60 fps). OR was that for a different higher resolution ?

The limitations of various display connection technologies are about how much data they can transfer per second. The higher the resolution, the lower the refresh rate it can support within that bandwidth limit. I think the confusion comes from the fact that HDMI 2.0 can only do 60 Hz at 3840x2160 (4K), but I think it can do 144 Hz at 1080p or 1440p.

 

FYI, I think DisplayPort may be required for Freesync or Gsync.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

The size of the screen itself does not matter, it is the resolution that matters, with the RX 480 you can use Free Sync on it just fine, the 2560x1080p is more demanding than 1920x1080p however not by too much, a single RX 480 would still be quite capable, provided that it is the 8gb model since the higher the resolution the more vram you will use.

 

In my case though I use a nVidia so I can't use the Free Sync however V-Sync at the 75hz has always made my games smooth enough with no stuttering.

Thank you very much Princess, 'll keep your advice for now. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, typographie said:

The limitations of various display connection technologies are about how much data they can transfer per second. The higher the resolution, the lower the refresh rate it can support within that bandwidth limit. I think the confusion comes from the fact that HDMI 2.0 can only do 60 Hz at 3840x2160 (4K), but I think it can do 144 Hz at 1080p or 1440p.

Oh so thats only for 4K, Thanks mate!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×