Jump to content

GTX 1060 or GTX 980 Ti?

Gaged
18 hours ago, david cassar said:

pretty sure the 980 ti doesn't have slower memory also for 68 more bucks I would definitely get the 980 ti. It's about 30% faster than the 1060.

Memory clock speed is a bit slower than the 1060 if I'm correct. But the 980 ti is faster regardless.

Nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, App4that said:

Because Pascal has memory compression...

Yeah because Maxwell and Kepler doesn't support DCC.

18 hours ago, jjohnthedon1 said:

So which is better 

raw bandwidth or compresion ?

Depend on situation, memory compression doesn't work all the time.

b3dbw.png

 

With random texture the raw bandwidth of Fury/Fury-X is better than any Nvidia cards but when on black texture even the 980 give better effective bandwidth compare to the Fury.

| Intel i7-3770@4.2Ghz | Asus Z77-V | Zotac 980 Ti Amp! Omega | DDR3 1800mhz 4GB x4 | 300GB Intel DC S3500 SSD | 512GB Plextor M5 Pro | 2x 1TB WD Blue HDD |
 | Enermax NAXN82+ 650W 80Plus Bronze | Fiio E07K | Grado SR80i | Cooler Master XB HAF EVO | Logitech G27 | Logitech G600 | CM Storm Quickfire TK | DualShock 4 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, xAcid9 said:

Yeah because Maxwell and Kepler doesn't support DCC.

Depend on situation, memory compression doesn't work all the time.

b3dbw.png

 

With random texture the raw bandwidth of Fury/Fury-X is better than any Nvidia cards when on black texture even the 980 give better effective bandwidth.

 

Um, I think you're reading that backwards. 

 

Nevermind, now I get ya.

If anyone asks you never saw me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×