Fury x vs Titan X vs 980TI vs 980 - DX12 , nVidia having nearly 50% cpu driver overhead than AMD

[El Diablo]

Amd have been known for having high cpu overhead which was to blame in certain gaymes for having lower performance

 

back in july 2015 the titan x was ruling, giving nearly double FPS than the fury

 

3/4 of a year later the Fiji XT Has taken the championship belt of the titan x stacking a total of 4096 stream punches to the jaw of the TITAN X

 

The first video ,,wel nuff said just watch it

 

and the second video illustrates the point that amd have improved their driver efficiency drastically

i added a 3rd video to showcase this isnt just a one off

 

The last video is to show how far ahead the Titan x was at one point

 

and u know what,, the titan killer isnt even out yet (Radeon Pro Duo)

 

amd is back

Videos are provided by " DudeRandom84 " of the youtubes and the last video is courtesy of

" Gregster Reviews"

Quote

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quote

 

 

 

 

[Dabombinable]

4 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

Amd have been known for having high cpu overhead which was to blame in certain gaymes for having lower performance

 

back in july 2015 the titan x was ruling, giving nearly double FPS than the fury

 

3/4 of a year later the Fiji XT Has taken the championship belt of the titan x stacking a total of 4096 stream punches to the jaw of the TITAN X

 

The first video ,,wel nuff said just watch it

 

and the second video illustrates the point that amd have improved their driver efficiency drastically

i added a 3rd video to showcase this isnt just a one off

 

The last video is to show how far ahead the Titan x was at one point

 

and u know what,, the titan killer isnt even out yet (Radeon Pro Duo)

 

amd is back

Videos are provided by " DudeRandom84 " of the youtubes and the last video is courtesy of

" Gregster Reviews"

 

 

 

 

 

Note. Single GPU vs 2x GPU with the problems and limitations associated with crossfire. AMD is far from being back on top.

[El Diablo]

1 minute ago, Dabombinable said:

Note. Single GPU vs 2x GPU with the problems and limitations associated with crossfire. AMD is far from being back on top.

its single gpu vs single gpu,, single fury is already beating the titan x

 

just everyone thought the "fury x2" was going to be the card to beat it

Edited April 11, 2016 by El Diablo
added stuff

[SecretAuthor]

Yeeeaaaahh boi!

 

AMD-4-LYF!!!

[Morgan MLGman]

12 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

yea just watch the video

 

a picture says 1000 words

Your posts for quite a while have been heavily AMD-biased, that's why I choose to ignore this one. I have, what one might call, an "AMD rig", and I can easily tell that a Titan X is not worse than a Fury X, and that's what you seem to be claiming here

[manikyath]

1 minute ago, Morgan MLGman said:

Your posts for quite a while are heavily AMD-biased, that's why I choose to ignore this one. I have, what one might call, an "AMD rig", and I can easily tell that a Titan X is not worse than a Fury X, and that's what you seem to be claiming here

this one is going on the records as another one of us agreeing. i'm mostly just here to add that comparing the titan X to a fury X is pretty dang hilareous.

 

a titan X by itself is pretty much wasted money for gaming because most likely nothing will fill up that VRAM, i've said since launch the titan X is a "no compromises SLI beast" because VRAM will most likely never be the limiting factor of its performance, compared to the *rather hilareous* 4GB VRAM you'd have on a 3-way fury X.

[David_K]

And i'm still looking at the YouTube video's he linked and waiting to see the Titan X gets stomped, or something about CPU overhead blablabla. and that comment about 4096 Stream processors ? I am waiting to see the punch. 

 

A 4096 "cores" chip based on GCN performing like almost ~3K Maxwell "cores" , yes, whats next, FX 9XXX is the best GPU it is running 5GHZ OMG FUCK INTEL.