How does wifi work?
If you need a very simplified explanation of how the data is transmitted, this video is about as simple as you can get; useful for when you get to the 2 most popular aspects of WiFi in your presentation.
If you need to extend the time of the presentation, you can get into the software aspects of it, and focus on why you never get the advertised throughput from your WiFi router.
This will open the door for you to touch on why you normally only get around 50-60% of the PHY rate for pretty much all of the WiFI standards.
You can explain how WiFi is still very much a collision domain which relies heavily on control frames to effectively share the air time and minimize the negative impacts to the noise floor. e.g., request to send, clear to send, and acknowledge. this adds a bunch of overhead, then within each frame containing the data you actually want to send, there is more overhead due to the OSI model, as well as the various checksums that are done to check for errors, and re-transmit data as needed (which it needs to do often). The need for lots of management, eats up around half of the throughput, which is why you typically see an N300 connection topping out at around 120-150Mbps in the real world.
Usually if the error rate goes beyond some arbitrary level (typically set by whoever was writing the code for the WiFi radio), then it will use a lower modulation, in addition to using other methods to lower the PHY rate until the error rate drops below that arbitrary level.
If it is programmed poorly, then the effects can be pretty catastrophic, as in a heavily congested environment, the WiFI radio will not find any rate where it is happy with the error rate, and thus drop as low as the standard will allow, e.g., with this WNR3500Lv2 in an area with well over 150 access points at the time. Channel 2 had the fewest APs and thus the auto selection, picked it, but since auto channel select does not pick based on actual throughput, it picked the worst channel.

The best being channel 8 which was fairly crowded.

I you look at some modern router reviews, you will often see many high end ones using roughly the same hardware, but some will perform significantly faster than others. that is often due to better software. e.g., the devs were less overzealous with reducing the PHY rate, and overall finding ways to get the most out of the hardware. At that point, things get extremely complex, and there are very few people who are extremely good at it. e.g., look at what happens when a NAS manufacturer tries to design a router. http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/32960-synology-rt1900ac-router-reviewed

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now