Jump to content

Whats Wrong with raid0?

Go to solution Solved by Glenwing,
2 minutes ago, Abdullahseba said:

Hi

I'm always reading that you should not use SSDs in raid0 because of data loss.

Is this because raid0 has no redundancy or is it because using raid0 usually makes drives fail suddenly?

Thanks in advance.

It is because of zero redundancy. RAID 0 does not increase failure rate of drives though. Considering SSD failure rate is fairly low, I don't think RAID 0 SSDs is something to be afraid of, though of course critical data shouldn't be kept on it. The only thing is there's really no benefit to RAID 0 SSDs, it just increases boot time since the RAID controller has to initialize.

2 minutes ago, Abdullahseba said:

Hi

I'm always reading that you should not use SSDs in raid0 because of data loss.

Is this because raid0 has no redundancy or is it because using raid0 usually makes drives fail suddenly?

Thanks in advance.

It is because of zero redundancy. RAID 0 does not increase failure rate of drives though. Considering SSD failure rate is fairly low, I don't think RAID 0 SSDs is something to be afraid of, though of course critical data shouldn't be kept on it. The only thing is there's really no benefit to RAID 0 SSDs, it just increases boot time since the RAID controller has to initialize.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/561106-whats-wrong-with-raid0/#findComment-7382155
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

due to redundancy.

 

In raid 0 if 1 drive fails ..that's it.

 

SSD's have a lower complete failure rate than HDD's, but higher Data loss and incorrectable errors over time.

 

The more SSD's in a raid0 the higher the chances of loosing data or even seeing failure of the entire raid due to data loss, requiring format and recreation.

 

BUT, its nothing to be really worried about so long as the data is not irreplaceable. Also RAID 0 SSD's doesn't make much sense as u would likely never notice the difference unless ur constantly doing file transfers.

CPU: Intel i7 3930k w/OC & EK Supremacy EVO Block | Motherboard: Asus P9x79 Pro  | RAM: G.Skill 4x4 1866 CL9 | PSU: Seasonic Platinum 1000w Corsair RM 750w Gold (2021)|

VDU: Panasonic 42" Plasma | GPU: Gigabyte 1080ti Gaming OC & Barrow Block (RIP)...GTX 980ti | Sound: Asus Xonar D2X - Z5500 -FiiO X3K DAP/DAC - ATH-M50S | Case: Phantek Enthoo Primo White |

Storage: Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SSD + WD Blue 1TB SSD | Cooling: XSPC D5 Photon 270 Res & Pump | 2x XSPC AX240 White Rads | NexXxos Monsta 80x240 Rad P/P | NF-A12x25 fans |

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/561106-whats-wrong-with-raid0/#findComment-7382160
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAID was designed for data redundancy. RAID 0 isn't a RAID but people still call it however it has NO data redundancy at all. More drives in a RAID0 = more likely to go wrong.

See my blog for amusing encounters from IT workplace: http://linustechtips.com/main/blog/585-life-of-a-techie/

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/561106-whats-wrong-with-raid0/#findComment-7382165
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Glenwing said:

It is because of zero redundancy. RAID 0 does not increase failure rate of drives though. Considering SSD failure rate is fairly low, I don't think RAID 0 SSDs is something to be afraid of, though of course critical data shouldn't be kept on it. The only thing is there's really no benefit to RAID 0 SSDs, it just increases boot time since the RAID controller has to initialize.

doesn't it double your drive space then?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/561106-whats-wrong-with-raid0/#findComment-7382173
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×