Jump to content

Windows 7 vs Windows 10 on low-end PC

djdelarosa25

At school I'm running MSX on a P4 with hyper threading and it works really well with 2GB's of RAM :)

Windows 10?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would say Win7 for the optimisation for low end stuff

AMD FX-8350|8GB DDR3|GTX750TI|2TB HDD|CX-430 PSU|

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful, I tried to install windows 10 and 8.1 on an AMD Athlon 3000+ and it wouldn't let me - eventually I figured out why - These really old CPU's just don't have the architecture and instructions sets (missing SSE2 I believe) to be able to install newer OS's Windows 7 32 bit was as far as I could get with this CPU - It's not even 64 bit compatible...

DISPLAYS: LG 27UL500 IPS 4k60hz + HDR and LG 27GL650F IPS 1080p 144hz + HDR

 

LAPTOP: Lenovo Legion 5 CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H GPU: RTX 3070 8GB RAM: 16GB 3200MHz (2x8GB DDR4) STORAGE: 1TB Crucial P5 NVMe SSD + 2TB Samsung 970 evo plus NVMe SSD DISPLAY: 1080p 165hz IPS OS: Windows 10 Pro x64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is 64-bit compatible, but I'll just go with 7. Never liked 10's design anyway. 7 felt much more "PC-like" if you know what I mean.

 

P.S. 32-bit or 64-bit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

64 bit will consume a greater amount of RAM, and about 200 MB more at idle. At the same time, with a 32 bit system, you may not be able to run some applications that are 64 bit only.

 

Microsoft have an article on the subject: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-ca/windows7/taking-the-mystery-out-of-64-bit-windows

 

If you could find another 2 GB RAM stick, I would then say it's better to go with 64 bit. If you do find another RAM stick, be careful about mixing different brands of RAM: http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2010/07/what-are-the-rules-on-mixing-two-different-types-of-ram/

You own the software that you purchase - Understanding software licenses and EULAs

 

"We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the american public believes is false" - William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful, I tried to install windows 10 and 8.1 on an AMD Athlon 3000+ and it wouldn't let me - eventually I figured out why - These really old CPU's just don't have the architecture and instructions sets (missing SSE2 I believe) to be able to install newer OS's Windows 7 32 bit was as far as I could get with this CPU - It's not even 64 bit compatible...

I have windows 10 running on a pentium 4 with 512MB's of RAM. Don't know what you're talking about.

Sergeant, United States Marine Corps

Network Administrator, Comptia A+, Security+, Cisco Certified Networking Associate

From a G3258 to dual Xeon E5-2670's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Windows 10 uses less system resources than windows 7, so effectively yeah. However there may be driver complications using old hardware on windows 10.

RyanTheCanadian

Network Administration / Systems Management and Security / White Hat

 

My computer is the definition of scrapyard wars.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have windows 10 running on a pentium 4 with 512MB's of RAM. Don't know what you're talking about.

This:

post-231750-0-82589000-1452267616_thumb.

DISPLAYS: LG 27UL500 IPS 4k60hz + HDR and LG 27GL650F IPS 1080p 144hz + HDR

 

LAPTOP: Lenovo Legion 5 CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H GPU: RTX 3070 8GB RAM: 16GB 3200MHz (2x8GB DDR4) STORAGE: 1TB Crucial P5 NVMe SSD + 2TB Samsung 970 evo plus NVMe SSD DISPLAY: 1080p 165hz IPS OS: Windows 10 Pro x64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct some CPUs don't support Windows 8/10 due to lack of CPU technology that Windows 8/10 needs.

AMD CPUs on Socket 939 and older cannot run Windows 8/10.

As for the Pentium 4, only the latest Pentium 4 chips (remember Intel was using this architecture for the longest time due to lack of competition), support the needed technology for Windows 8/10. Older Pentium 4 chips aren't supported. Intel was still selling Pentium 4s (and D's, which was 2x P4's stuck together, with Intel crossing its finger it would somewhat work, unlike the true and proper implementation from AMD Athlon 64 X2 chips, and later Core 2 Duo's).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×