Jump to content

AMD's new APUS

Hey guys, I've been wondering for a while if we can expect to see amazing performance from amd's apus. Given how much difference faster ram makes for the apus, and since these will be released on socket AM4, which will support ddr4, it sounds like we can expect some outstanding price:performance from these. What do you guys think?

LTT's Fastest 9800gt

LTT Forum Beginners Guide

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expect whatever you want, AMD hasn't delivered on APU or CPU in years. I will just wait.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD said they were going to release new APUs and CPUs next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup DDR4 but some of their charts was marked DDR3 support also... :S

Lake-V-X6-10600 (Gaming PC)

R23 score MC: 9190pts | R23 score SC: 1302pts

R20 score MC: 3529cb | R20 score SC: 506cb

Spoiler

Case: Cooler Master HAF XB Evo Black / Case Fan(s) Front: Noctua NF-A14 ULN 140mm Premium Fans / Case Fan(s) Rear: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition (red) / Case Fan(s) Side: Noctua NF-A6x25 FLX 60mm Premium Fan / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo / CPU: Intel Core i5-10600, 6-cores, 12-threads, 4.4/4.8GHz, 13,5MB cache (Intel 14nm++ FinFET) / Display: ASUS 24" LED VN247H (67Hz OC) 1920x1080p / GPU: Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC @1501MHz (Samsung 14nm FinFET) / Keyboard: Logitech Desktop K120 (Nordic) / Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B460 PLUS, Socket-LGA1200 / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 850W / RAM A1, A2, B1 & B2: DDR4-2666MHz CL13-15-15-15-35-1T "Samsung 8Gbit C-Die" (4x8GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Sound: Zombee Z300 / Storage 1 & 2: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD / Storage 3: Seagate® Barracuda 2TB HDD / Storage 4: Seagate® Desktop 2TB SSHD / Storage 5: Crucial P1 1000GB M.2 SSD/ Storage 6: Western Digital WD7500BPKX 2.5" HDD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN851N 11n Wireless Adapter (Qualcomm Atheros)

Zen-II-X6-3600+ (Gaming PC)

R23 score MC: 9893pts | R23 score SC: 1248pts @4.2GHz

R23 score MC: 10151pts | R23 score SC: 1287pts @4.3GHz

R20 score MC: 3688cb | R20 score SC: 489cb

Spoiler

Case: Medion Micro-ATX Case / Case Fan Front: SUNON MagLev PF70251VX-Q000-S99 70mm / Case Fan Rear: Fanner Tech(Shen Zhen)Co.,LTD. 80mm (Purple) / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 125w Thermal Solution / CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, 6-cores, 12-threads, 4.2/4.2GHz, 35MB cache (T.S.M.C. 7nm FinFET) / Display: HP 24" L2445w (64Hz OC) 1920x1200 / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: ASUS Radeon RX 6600 XT DUAL OC RDNA2 32CUs @2607MHz (T.S.M.C. 7nm FinFET) / Keyboard: HP KB-0316 PS/2 (Nordic) / Motherboard: ASRock B450M Pro4, Socket-AM4 / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 550W / RAM A2 & B2: DDR4-3600MHz CL16-18-8-19-37-1T "SK Hynix 8Gbit CJR" (2x16GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Sound 1: Zombee Z500 / Sound 2: Logitech Stereo Speakers S-150 / Storage 1 & 2: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD / Storage 3: Western Digital My Passport 2.5" 2TB HDD / Storage 4: Western Digital Elements Desktop 2TB HDD / Storage 5: Kingston A2000 1TB M.2 NVME SSD / Wi-fi & Bluetooth: ASUS PCE-AC55BT Wireless Adapter (Intel)

Vishera-X8-9370 | R20 score MC: 1476cb

Spoiler

Case: Cooler Master HAF XB Evo Black / Case Fan(s) Front: Noctua NF-A14 ULN 140mm Premium Fans / Case Fan(s) Rear: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition (red) / Case Fan(s) Side: Noctua NF-A6x25 FLX 60mm Premium Fan / Case Fan VRM: SUNON MagLev KDE1209PTV3 92mm / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo / CPU: AMD FX-8370 (Base: @4.4GHz | Turbo: @4.7GHz) Black Edition Eight-Core (Global Foundries 32nm) / Display: ASUS 24" LED VN247H (67Hz OC) 1920x1080p / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC @1501MHz (Samsung 14nm FinFET) / Keyboard: Logitech Desktop K120 (Nordic) / Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING, Socket-AM3+ / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 850W PSU / RAM 1, 2, 3 & 4: Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866MHz CL8-10-10-28-37-2T (4x4GB) 16.38GB / Operating System 1: Windows 10 Home / Sound: Zombee Z300 / Storage 1: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD (x2) / Storage 2: Seagate® Barracuda 2TB HDD / Storage 3: Seagate® Desktop 2TB SSHD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN951N 11n Wireless Adapter

Godavari-X4-880K | R20 score MC: 810cb

Spoiler

Case: Medion Micro-ATX Case / Case Fan Front: SUNON MagLev PF70251VX-Q000-S99 70mm / Case Fan Rear: Fanner Tech(Shen Zhen)Co.,LTD. 80mm (Purple) / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 95w Thermal Solution / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 125w Thermal Solution / CPU: AMD Athlon X4 860K Black Edition Elite Quad-Core (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / CPU: AMD Athlon X4 880K Black Edition Elite Quad-Core (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / Display: HP 19" Flat Panel L1940 (75Hz) 1280x1024 / GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 960 SuperSC 2GB (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / Keyboard: HP KB-0316 PS/2 (Nordic) / Motherboard: MSI A78M-E45 V2, Socket-FM2+ / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 550W PSU / RAM 1, 2, 3 & 4: SK hynix DDR3-1866MHz CL9-10-11-27-40 (4x4GB) 16.38GB / Operating System 1: Ubuntu Gnome 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus) / Operating System 2: Windows 10 Home / Sound 1: Zombee Z500 / Sound 2: Logitech Stereo Speakers S-150 / Storage 1: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD (x2) / Storage 2: Western Digital My Passport 2.5" 2TB HDD / Storage 3: Western Digital Elements Desktop 2TB HDD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN851N 11n Wireless Adapter

Acer Aspire 7738G custom (changed CPU, GPU & Storage)
Spoiler

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 2-cores, 2-threads, 2.4GHz, 3MB cache (Intel 45nm) / GPU: ATi Radeon HD 4570 515MB DDR2 (T.S.M.C. 55nm) / RAM: DDR2-1066MHz CL7-7-7-20-1T (2x2GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Storage: Crucial BX500 480GB 3D NAND SATA 2.5" SSD

Complete portable device SoC history:

Spoiler
Apple A4 - Apple iPod touch (4th generation)
Apple A5 - Apple iPod touch (5th generation)
Apple A9 - Apple iPhone 6s Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 810 (T.S.M.C. 7nm) - Huawei P40 Lite / Huawei nova 7i
Mediatek MT2601 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - TicWatch E
Mediatek MT6580 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - TECNO Spark 2 (1GB RAM)
Mediatek MT6592M (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone my32 (orange)
Mediatek MT6592M (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone my32 (yellow)
Mediatek MT6735 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - HMD Nokia 3 Dual SIM
Mediatek MT6737 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - Cherry Mobile Flare S6
Mediatek MT6739 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone myX8 (blue)
Mediatek MT6739 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone myX8 (gold)
Mediatek MT6750 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - honor 6C Pro / honor V9 Play
Mediatek MT6765 (T.S.M.C 12nm) - TECNO Pouvoir 3 Plus
Mediatek MT6797D (T.S.M.C 20nm) - my|phone Brown Tab 1
Qualcomm MSM8926 (T.S.M.C. 28nm) - Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE
Qualcomm MSM8974AA (T.S.M.C. 28nm) - Blackberry Passport
Qualcomm SDM710 (Samsung 10nm) - Oppo Realme 3 Pro

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expect whatever you want, AMD hasn't delivered on APU or CPU in years. I will just wait.

APU,s theyve done right. BUT, their CPUs NOPE...

 

I would say, in the "intergrated" space, INtel has been the one disappointing. For the price, their rivaling products aka Broadwell, is so expensive, with so little in return performance wise, that it simply does not make sense at all.

3x price for 15-20% performance gain.

 

To put things in perspective:

That is similar to a reference 980 costing 3x more then a 970. While still being only 15% faster. Nobody would buy such a GPU.

 

While it will be interesting to see how they go forwards with the AM4 socket, i think what they should have done is give is a proper product. Desktop Carrizo, yes i KNOW it cannot be done because the density of the chip is so high that any TDP over 35W causes so much leakage that a Kaveri APU bypasses it in both efficiency and performance...

 

BUT they could atleast give us something with a proper GPU onboard able to max out more of the CPU... a R7 250 is a BIT cheap..

 

especially since Carrizo, their latest gen APU uses Tonga (R9 285/R9 380)... Tonga came around the same time/before Kaveri was released... their GPU and CPU and APU business could have just exchanged some words and made a ballin product... its not like their shy of using power. So a 125W SKU wouldnt "shock" anyone...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

apu's at the moment are being smashed by cpu+gpu combo so I don't see what's right about them.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

apu's at the moment are being smashed by cpu+gpu combo so I don't see what's right about them.

yes and no.

 

if going by new parts (because used APUs will be dirt cheap). Up to 350 USD, APUs reign king. Not because there cannot be had better options, but because those other options have just as bad or worse caveats then the APU... If going with slim HTPC/NUC then i would set the "ceiling" for total system to 500 USD, because you gotta add a sizeable 2.5" HDD or SSD. And they usually cost a bit more if you want a nippy HDD at that size.

 

Knowing that the start price for broadwell (CPU + mobo) is around 330-340 USD ish, then really. There is not much "competition" atm... It's a damn shame the skylake i3s didnt have a better iGPU (they got a 5-10% boost... pathetic since even the A8 APUs were like 30-50% ahead of Haswells iGPUs)....

 

a good "budget" setup would a 860k (screw the G3258, its a toy. This CPU costs the same and performs better) and a AMD 260X... you can maybe if you REALLY try, squeeze those together if you go for a non-OC AMD board. Unfortunatly, NOT if you go for mITX though.

 

It is all about use case.

For a budget LAN rig, playing CS 1.6 or CS:GO / WC3 /Star-Craft/Age of Empires... it is really hard to argue against APUs.... however, just like all other products. There is a time and place for everything. Since Kaveri APUs doesnt support full range Crossfire. they are useless.

 

This is another feature Carrizo did right. The ability to CF with any AMD GPU... be it a 390X or a 240 (i think the limitation is it being GDDR5 VRAM. Dont think HBM will work)....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes and no.

 

if going by new parts (because used APUs will be dirt cheap). Up to 350 USD, APUs reign king. Not because there cannot be had better options, but because those other options have just as bad or worse caveats then the APU... If going with slim HTPC/NUC then i would set the "ceiling" for total system to 500 USD, because you gotta add a sizeable 2.5" HDD or SSD. And they usually cost a bit more if you want a nippy HDD at that size.

 

Knowing that the start price for broadwell (CPU + mobo) is around 330-340 USD ish, then really. There is not much "competition" atm... It's a damn shame the skylake i3s didnt have a better iGPU (they got a 5-10% boost... pathetic since even the A8 APUs were like 30-50% ahead of Haswells iGPUs)....

 

a good "budget" setup would a 860k (screw the G3258, its a toy. This CPU costs the same and performs better) and a AMD 260X... you can maybe if you REALLY try, squeeze those together if you go for a non-OC AMD board. Unfortunatly, NOT if you go for mITX though.

 

It is all about use case.

For a budget LAN rig, playing CS 1.6 or CS:GO / WC3 /Star-Craft/Age of Empires... it is really hard to argue against APUs.... however, just like all other products. There is a time and place for everything. Since Kaveri APUs doesnt support full range Crossfire. they are useless.

 

This is another feature Carrizo did right. The ability to CF with any AMD GPU... be it a 390X or a 240 (i think the limitation is it being GDDR5 VRAM. Dont think HBM will work)....

260x is like TWICE or THREE TIMES as powerful as 7870k tho... It's like not even funny.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

260x is like TWICE or THREE TIMES as powerful as 7870k tho... It's like not even funny.

and it is quite cheap.

although, at most it is 75-100% stronger

 

here is a comparison for you

http://anandtech.com/bench/product/1124?vs=1044

And NOPE, its not a 7870k (aka 270X) that is in the APU. its a 7750 or something like that.. so even worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

and it is quite cheap.

although, at most it is 75-100% stronger

 

here is a comparison for you

http://anandtech.com/bench/product/1124?vs=1044

And NOPE, its not a 7870k (aka 270X) that is in the APU. its a 7750 or something like that.. so even worse.

yes I know it's terribad. Actually 7750/r7 250 is way more powerful than 7850k/7870k igpu. http://www.anandtech.com/show/7677/amd-kaveri-review-a8-7600-a10-7850k/12 It gets smacked by 6750. It's just awful at the moment, SO far behind.

 

Looking at notebookcheck APU's are barely faster than low end laptop gpu's http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-R7-512-Cores-Kaveri-Desktop.112875.0.html

 

 

It's just so sad

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I know it's terribad. Actually 7750/r7 250 is way more powerful than 7850k/7870k igpu. http://www.anandtech.com/show/7677/amd-kaveri-review-a8-7600-a10-7850k/12 It gets smacked by 6750. It's just awful at the moment, SO far behind.

 

Looking at notebookcheck APU's are barely faster than low end laptop gpu's http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-R7-512-Cores-Kaveri-Desktop.112875.0.html

 

 

It's just so sad

And your point is? If it runs what I want it to, and is cheaper than a cpu/gpu combo then there is no issue here.

 

I mean, if I wanted to, I could theoreticallly run GTA V on the Sempron 3850 I have stored on my shelf. Of course it would require tweaking and some overclocking to get just right, but still; my system is currently worth $80ish in purchased parts.

 

And when AM4 comes out, if it beats the Athlon 5350, I'm upgrading to AM4.

 

However I'd love to see a motherboard with a Carrizo chip that meets either the mini or pico ITX format, I'm looking for something to fit inside this dead PS2 I have. :3

My procrastination is the bane of my existence.

I make games and stuff in my spare time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

And your point is? If it runs what I want it to, and is cheaper than a cpu/gpu combo then there is no issue here.

 

I mean, if I wanted to, I could theoreticallly run GTA V on the Sempron 3850 I have stored on my shelf. Of course it would require tweaking and some overclocking to get just right, but still; my system is currently worth $80ish in purchased parts.

 

And when AM4 comes out, if it beats the Athlon 5350, I'm upgrading to AM4.

 

However I'd love to see a motherboard with a Carrizo chip that meets either the mini or pico ITX format, I'm looking for something to fit inside this dead PS2 I have. :3

it is very slightly cheaper and much much slower.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I know it's terribad. Actually 7750/r7 250 is way more powerful than 7850k/7870k igpu. http://www.anandtech.com/show/7677/amd-kaveri-review-a8-7600-a10-7850k/12 It gets smacked by 6750. It's just awful at the moment, SO far behind.

 

Looking at notebookcheck APU's are barely faster than low end laptop gpu's http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-R7-512-Cores-Kaveri-Desktop.112875.0.html

 

 

It's just so sad

well, its a iGPU at a sensible price point?... what the fuck do you expect?

 

Broadwell is overpriced to such an extent its not even funny. If broadwell was 100 USD cheaper, it would still be a stiff price to pay, but it would make some sort of sense. but 279 USD for a fucking underclocked i5 with a strong iGPU is way out of line.

 

That being said, Broadwell is more like a 260... so even THE best iGPU on the market is still abysmal...

 

however my point still stands. APUs have a PLACE. inside a slimline HTPC or NUC.

Good luck putting a GPU inside a NUC, since a NUC is so small that even the R9 Nano wouldnt fit, regardless how much you try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

however my point still stands. APUs have a PLACE. inside a slimline HTPC or NUC.

Good luck putting a GPU inside a NUC, since a NUC is so small that even the R9 Nano wouldnt fit, regardless how much you try.

eh, broadwell doesn't even exist in my mind. 

 

Show me an apu that's inside of a nuc. APU's have HUGE tdp's for nucs.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is very slightly cheaper and much much slower.

ok, let us match the price?

 

AMD A10 7870k

140 USD

 

ok! let us MATCH the CPU

AMD Athlon 860k

70 USD

 

let us match the GPU

AMD R7 250 (http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gigabyte-video-card-gvr725oc2girev30) <- even more underclocked then the iGPU inside the APU. but that one was cheapest.

76 USD

 

OH SNAP... 6USD more, and ZERO improvement in performance.

 

 

ok! let us do this they way some idiot would do it:

G3258 -> 64 USD

 

and the only GPU you can get within the 140 USD budget is...

http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gigabyte-video-card-gvr725oc2girev30 <- yes, that underclocked shitty R7 250 from gigabyte....

 

 

gratz brah. you cannot beat an APU on price.

Incidentally, you can OC the iGPU and CPU quite easily to gain even MORE performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, let us match the price?

 

AMD A10 7870k

140 USD

 

ok! let us MATCH the CPU

AMD Athlon 860k

70 USD

 

let us match the GPU

AMD R7 250 (http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gigabyte-video-card-gvr725oc2girev30) <- even more underclocked then the iGPU inside the APU. but that one was cheapest.

76 USD

 

OH SNAP... 6USD more, and ZERO improvement in performance.

 

 

ok! let us do this they way some idiot would do it:

G3258 -> 64 USD

 

and the only GPU you can get within the 140 USD budget is...

http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gigabyte-video-card-gvr725oc2girev30 <- yes, that underclocked shitty R7 250 from gigabyte....

 

 

gratz brah. you cannot beat an APU on price.

Incidentally, you can OC the iGPU and CPU quite easily to gain even MORE performance.

ZERO improvement? We just established that r7 250 KICKS APU's ASS with DOUBLE the performance. did you sleep through that part?

Let me refresh your memory 6750<7750<r7 250. http://www.anandtech.com/show/7677/amd-kaveri-review-a8-7600-a10-7850k/12

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh, broadwell doesn't even exist in my mind. 

 

Show me an apu that's inside of a nuc. APU's have HUGE tdp's for nucs.

NUC is a intel "thing"... thats why.

 

Good luck finding ANY AMD part inside a "NUC".... The TDP is perfectly manageble even in a small space. Just slap a weak copper blower cooler on it and thats it. Cooling is dealt with.

for reference... INtel "invented" or rather introduced the 5"x5" mobo. Which is as small or smaller then some of the custom NUC mobos... they thought that something SMALLER then mITX was perfectly fine with a 65w TDP CPU....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

ZERO improvement? We just established that r7 250 KICKS APU's ASS with DOUBLE the performance. did you sleep through that part?

Let me refresh your memory 6750<7750<r7 250. http://www.anandtech.com/show/7677/amd-kaveri-review-a8-7600-a10-7850k/12

R7 250 IS THE FUCKING iGPU USED INSIDE THE APU

 

IT IS A R7 250.

 

WE TALKED ABOUT THE R7 260X. A BONAIRE BASED GPU

APUS ARE BASED ON CAPE VERDE.

 

R7 260X COSTS 100 USD FOR EVEN THE CHEAPEST ONE.

A APU COSTS 110 USD FOR THE 7850k....

 

ATLEAST GET SOMETHING RIGHT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, let us match the price?

 

AMD A10 7870k

140 USD

 

ok! let us MATCH the CPU

AMD Athlon 860k

70 USD

 

let us match the GPU

AMD R7 250 (http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gigabyte-video-card-gvr725oc2girev30) <- even more underclocked then the iGPU inside the APU. but that one was cheapest.

76 USD

 

OH SNAP... 6USD more, and ZERO improvement in performance.

 

 

ok! let us do this they way some idiot would do it:

G3258 -> 64 USD

 

and the only GPU you can get within the 140 USD budget is...

http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gigabyte-video-card-gvr725oc2girev30 <- yes, that underclocked shitty R7 250 from gigabyte....

 

 

gratz brah. you cannot beat an APU on price.

Incidentally, you can OC the iGPU and CPU quite easily to gain even MORE performance.

Thank you for this!

My procrastination is the bane of my existence.

I make games and stuff in my spare time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

R7 250 IS THE FUCKING iGPU USED INSIDE THE APU

 

IT IS A R7 250.

 

WE TALKED ABOUT THE R7 260X. A BONAIRE BASED GPU.

 

APUS ARE BASED ON CAPE VERDE.

 

ATLEAST GET SOMETHING RIGHT!

r7 250 is not the igpu inside the apu, you are high. r7 250 is much faster than the APU. r7 250 is rebranded 7750.

 
only ddr3 r7 250 is as slow as igpu r7. ddr5 is faster.

Thank you for this!

for false argument?

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

r7 250 is not the igpu inside the apu, you are high. r7 250 is much faster than the APU. r7 250 is rebranded 7750.

 
only ddr3 r7 250 is as slow as igpu r7. ddr5 is faster.
for false argument?

 

*sigh* here, have fun.

 

http://anandtech.com/show/9307/the-kaveri-refresh-godavari-review-testing-amds-a10-7870k/5

 

compare the 240 scores to the iGPU 7870k scores...

 

a stock R7 250 is 1000MHz..

the iGPU inside the 7870k is 820MHz...

 

Guess why it is slower?

 

Also... Kaveri, aka A10 7850k is GCN 1.1

So technically Hawaii core...

Although it performs about as a underclocked R7 250.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

*sigh* here, have fun.

 

http://anandtech.com/show/9307/the-kaveri-refresh-godavari-review-testing-amds-a10-7870k/5

 

compare the 240 scores to the iGPU 7870k scores...

 

a stock R7 250 is 1000MHz..

the iGPU inside the 7870k is 820MHz...

 

Guess why it is slower?

 

Also... Kaveri, aka A10 7850k is GCN 1.1

So technically Hawaii core...

Although it performs about as a underclocked R7 250. 

so it's established, it's worse than a r7 250. exactly what I have been saying all along. Even r7 240 ddr3 beats it most of the time. It's just awful. eww.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

so it's established, it's worse than a r7 250. exactly what I have been saying all along. Even r7 240 ddr3 beats it most of the time. It's just awful. eww.

I question which graph you were looking at... let me guess, the dual graphics one where you use BOTH A APU + THE 240?

 

cuz it didnt win any other fucking time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I question which graph you were looking at... let me guess, the dual graphics one where you use BOTH A APU + THE 240?

 

cuz it didnt win any other fucking time.

74849.png74857.png

 

 

74851.png

74859.png

 

 

and lets remember, this is a r7 240 gddr3. Not even a r7 250 gddr3, not r7 250 gddr5, not r7 250x, not a used gpu you could get for 70$ like a 6850 or something.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×