Sata III

[Sena17]

instructions per cycle.

 

it basicly describes the speed of a single core, in a way thats not dependant on clock speed.

Ah, well anyway in a few years time I'll finally be able to have a job and I'll be working around the clock to build a top of the line Intel and Nvidia powered machine. But for now, I basically have the budget of a college student.

[manikyath]

Ah, well anyway in a few years time I'll finally be able to have a job and I'll be working around the clock to build a top of the line Intel and Nvidia powered machine. But for now, I basically have the budget of a college student.

for all we know we may be going for an AMD zen - <insert new gpu manufacturer here> build in a few years.

 

lots can change over time.

[Sena17]

for all we know we may be going for an AMD zen - <insert new gpu manufacturer here> build in a few years.

 

lots can change over time.

True, but I doubt Nvidia will ever be knocked off of their throne. Nvidia does everything from the gpus in the new Audi R8's dashboards to NASA's graphical predictions of spacecraft flight. (Not really but you know what I mean)

[manikyath]

True, but I doubt Nvidia will ever be knocked off of their throne. Nvidia does everything from the gpus in the new Audi R8's dashboards to NASA's graphical predictions of spacecraft flight. (Not really but you know what I mean)

well... you'd be surprised.

 

the professional crowd is the least loyal market to be found. they simply needs a part that does the job, the part that does the job the quickest and the cheapest gets picked.

end of story.

[Guest]

I ran my ssd on sata II for a while, it was fine, still fast. The biggest thing I noticed from getting a sata III board was I boot into windows and start apps a bit faster now

[ybriK]

I have another machine with a SATA II and honestly it only takes 25 seconds boot from an SSD. Sure you lose roughly around 250MB/s of seq. r/w and other stats but I have never tested that machine with a SATA III so who knows if i can cut down the boot time to a significant difference. Also there's nothing wrong with an 8350 if you're someone who's into gaming, streaming and on a really small budget. However a locked/unlocked Ivy Bridge and above i5 will definitely outperform an 8350 in terms of gaming.

 

 

SATA II SAMSUNG EVO 840

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 4.1.0 Shizuku Edition x64 © 2007-2015 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [sATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

   Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) :   282.867 MB/s
  Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) :   267.429 MB/s
  Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) :   166.055 MB/s [ 40540.8 IOPS]
 Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) :   156.349 MB/s [ 38171.1 IOPS]
         Sequential Read (T= 1) :   262.301 MB/s
        Sequential Write (T= 1) :   252.921 MB/s
   Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) :    30.873 MB/s [  7537.4 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) :    57.255 MB/s [ 13978.3 IOPS]

  Test : 1024 MiB [C: 49.2% (55.0/111.8 GiB)] (x3)  [interval=5 sec]
    OS : Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)