Best GPU for 1440p excluding...

[blabla21]

...Fury X and GTX 980 Ti

 

Im looking that can Handle modern games at 1440p at least at 50+ FPS at max (with AA disabled, and few settings which can only be noticeable if you compare it to high or medium) without it beign GTX 980 Ti and Fury and X

 

Im asking this because I want to see which GPU can handle those games until Arctic Islands and Pascal come out.

 

[Zayzo]

...Fury X and GTX 980 Ti

 

Im looking that can Handle modern games at 1440p at least at 50+ FPS at max (with AA disabled, and few settings which can only be noticeable if you compare it to high or medium) without it beign GTX 980 Ti and Fury and X

 

Im asking this because I want to see which GPU can handle those games until Arctic Islands and Pascal come out.

390x and gtx 980

[Tim Drake]

390x or used 980 as the price for a new 980 is disgusting

 

Also the Fury

[Zayzo]

390x or used 980 as the price for a new 980 is disgusting

 

Also the Fury

Depends on where you live.

[Mao_Zedong]

Well technically its the titan X. 

 

For 1440p, this is the general ranking:

titan X

980ti

fury x

fury

980

390(x)

970

[GGNN]

390x or used 980 as the price for a new 980 is disgusting

 

Also the Fury

I feel like $499 for a 980 k|ngp|n isn't that disgusting...

[Tim Drake]

Depends on where you live.

I feel like $499 for a 980 k|ngp|n isn't that disgusting...

 

I was being general guise

[OAcesync]

Well technically its the titan X. 

 

For 1440p, this is the general ranking:

titan X

980ti

fury x

fury

980

390x

970

390 over 970 and Titan X isn't king when a aftermarket 980Ti out of the box beats a Titan X

[pomaranc]

Well technically its the titan X. 

 

For 1440p, this is the general ranking:

titan X

980ti

fury x

fury

980

390x

970

isn't 390 better at 1440p than 970?

[Tagiau]

isn't 390 better at 1440p than 970?

I thought we were through this already. Everyone on the internet has some weird phobia about amd.

 

When there is a list, it can't be made up of half amd, half x.

 

But to answer, yes the 390 would be a better choice than the 970 at 1440p.

[adithyay328]

Well technically its the titan X. 

 

For 1440p, this is the general ranking:

titan X

980ti

fury x

fury

980

390x

970

The 970 with a little overclock could do the job. Or, just get the 980, and then no overclocking required.

[Mao_Zedong]

390 over 970 and Titan X isn't king when a aftermarket 980Ti out of the box beats a Titan X

if equally cooled, a titan X will beat a 980ti. The titan X has around 9% more cuda cores, so you can even run it at that much of a lower clockspeed for equal performance. That means a 1500mhz 980ti will be equal to a titan X at 1375mhz. You're also not including watercooling, which makes the titan X much better than the 980ti.

 

isn't 390 better at 1440p than 970?

 

I thought we were through this already. Everyone on the internet has some weird phobia about amd.

 

When there is a list, it can't be made up of half amd, half x.

 

But to answer, yes the 390 would be a better choice than the 970 at 1440p.

I didn't include the 390 because it was implied with the 390x.

[Dzzope]

980 from micro center if your near one... they were $286 a few weeks ago.. In-store only though.

[OAcesync]

if equally cooled, a titan X will beat a 980ti. The titan X has around 9% more cuda cores, so you can even run it at that much of a lower clockspeed for equal performance. That means a 1500mhz 980ti will be equal to a titan X at 1375mhz. You're also not including watercooling, which makes the titan X much better than the 980ti.

I'm talking about equal cooling, an aftermarket 980Ti on air will beat a Titan X on air not to mention that you can still further overclock that 980Ti, Titan X is a poor overclocker because of it's poor reference cooler so you need a watercooler which is a expensive. When comparing cards you should always base it on out of the box performance and not the silicon lottery.

[Zayzo]

I'm talking about equal cooling, an aftermarket 980Ti on air will beat a Titan X on air not to mention that you can still further overclock that 980Ti, Titan X is a poor overclocker because of it's poor reference cooler so you need a watercooler which is a expensive. When comparing cards you should always base it on out of the box performance and not the silicon lottery.

If you put both cards on water assuming you have similar luck in the silicon lottery for both cards, the titan-x will perform better.

[Mao_Zedong]

I'm talking about equal cooling, an aftermarket 980Ti on air will beat a Titan X on air not to mention that you can still further overclock that 980Ti, Titan X is a poor overclocker because of it's poor reference cooler so you need a watercooler which is a expensive. When comparing cards you should always base it on out of the box performance and not the silicon lottery.

Well you can get a titan X hybrid, which beats any 980ti out of the box. Assuming you aren't overclock like you said, the titan X would be faster. The titan X is at 1.15 GHZ and has 9% more cuda cores, so thats the same as a 980ti at 1.25GHZ. On the other hand, the fastest 980ti is the EVGA classified, which is just at 1.19ghz. The titan X also has more Vram, which could make it better for some things. The 980ti is still a much better value, but the titan X is just plain better.

[White Rabbit]

Of these six 980 Tis, every single one of them beats a Titan X out of the box, even the Zotac Amp edition with the tiny 50MHz factory overclock:

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GTX_980_Ti_STRIX_Gaming/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Palit/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti_Super_JetStream/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Zotac/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti_Amp_Edition/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_980_Ti_Gaming/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_980_Ti_SC_Plus/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Gigabyte/GTX_980_Ti_G1_Gaming/

 

Or you could buy a Titan X Hybrid or a Titan X Hydro Copper, but for that price you can SLI two 980 Tis.

[pjm0925]

980 from micro center if your near one... they were $286 a few weeks ago.. In-store only though.

Damn that's a great price, I should see if there's a store near me...

[Lazz45]

...Fury X and GTX 980 Ti

 

Im looking that can Handle modern games at 1440p at least at 50+ FPS at max (with AA disabled, and few settings which can only be noticeable if you compare it to high or medium) without it beign GTX 980 Ti and Fury and X

 

Im asking this because I want to see which GPU can handle those games until Arctic Islands and Pascal come out.

 

well based on these statements you want bang for your buck, a 280x crossfire could be an option as these are pretty strong

 

but single card I would even consider a 290x as they are super cheap right now and were made for 1440p

[Dzzope]

Damn that's a great price, I should see if there's a store near me...

Hell yea.. If I was in the states and near one I'd bring some friends, buy 3, use 2 and sell 1 to cover most the costs..

[Dzzope]

Of these six 980 Tis, every single one of them beats a Titan X out of the box, even the Zotac Amp edition with the tiny 50MHz factory overclock:

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GTX_980_Ti_STRIX_Gaming/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Palit/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti_Super_JetStream/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Zotac/GeForce_GTX_980_Ti_Amp_Edition/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_980_Ti_Gaming/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_980_Ti_SC_Plus/

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Gigabyte/GTX_980_Ti_G1_Gaming/

 

Or you could buy a Titan X Hybrid or a Titan X Hydro Copper, but for that price you can SLI two 980 Tis.

OP said anything BUT 980ti or fury.. so 980 / 390x or lower.