i7 5820k vs i7 4790k/i7 6700k with dual gtx 980 ti

[Geno Boost]

is there noticeable bottleneck to go with i7 6700k vs i7 5820k with gtx 980 ti in games and some editing

[Fictionvl]

nope no bottlenecks what so ever, an i5 4690k can go with SLI 980 Ti's an it wont bottleneck 

[Oshino Shinobu]

It won't bottleneck in games. Hard to say how the 5820K will compare to a CPU that isn't released. 

[SeanAngelo]

you'll only see minor differences in performance between the 5820k and 4790k, though the 5820k might benefit more in rendering due to having 2 more cores than the 4790k. i'd go with the 4790k due to having less costs in terms of motherboard and RAM.

 

can't say for the i7 6700k cause it's not released yet.

[IateMApoo]

nope no bottlenecks what so ever, an i5 4690k can go with SLI 980 Ti's an it wont bottleneck 

Wouldnt count on that.

[Enderman]

well the 4790k is better than the 5820k so the 6700k will definitely be better

[Octavialicious]

Wouldnt count on that.

lol best thing I've heard all day

[Guest]

well the 4790k is better than the 5820k so the 6700k will definitely be better

The 4790k is not better than the 5820k... lol 

[Enderman]

The 4790k is not better than the 5820k... lol 

yup it is

games dont use more than 8 threads, and the higher clock speed and lower TDP of the 4790k make it get better performance than the 5820k

plus it has more overclocking potential, making it even better if you have decent cooling

[Guest]

yup it is

games dont use more than 8 threads, and the higher clock speed and lower TDP of the 4790k make it get better performance than the 5820k

plus it has more overclocking potential, making it even better if you have decent cooling

For games it gets like 5 more FPS but for editing.... it's a whole different story

[Enderman]

For games it gets like 5 more FPS but for editing.... it's a whole different story

yeah i wan only talking about games

[Guest]

yeah i wan only talking about games

Ah. OP doesn't need anything more than a 4790k from what it seems like.

[Enderman]

Ah. OP doesn't need anything more than a 4790k from what it seems like.

yeah unless youre making money from editing its not worth extra hundreds of dollars just for 2 more cores

Z97 is a better choice in this case

[DarkSmith2]

i would wait for 6700k, a lot of goodies ^.^

[Geno Boost]

yeah i wan only talking about games

i am starting lean on the i7 6700k/z100 platform but just how of a benefit would be to go i7 5820k/x99 on a software like sony vegas (non-pro) 

[Enderman]

i am starting lean on the i7 6700k/z100 platform but just how of a benefit would be to go i7 5820k/x99 on a software like sony vegas (non-pro) 

vegas uses all my cores

i would expect significant rendering improvement with an additional 4 threads

[Geno Boost]

vegas uses all my cores

i would expect significant rendering improvement with an additional 4 thkinreads

also kind off topic will pcie ssd (kington savage/plextor m.2)make a difference in render speeds vs sata 3 ssd

[Enderman]

also kind off topic will pcie ssd (kington savage/plextor m.2)make a difference in render speeds vs sata 3 ssd

no

it doesnt render fast enough to saturate a sata 3 connection

 

if youre talking about live playback for something like after effects, then yes drive speed can be an improvement and make editing easier/faster

but it wont really make any difference in vegas

[Geno Boost]

no

it doesnt render fast enough to saturate a sata 3 connection

 

if youre talking about live playback for something like after effects, then yes drive speed can be an improvement and make editing easier/faster

but it wont really make any difference in vegas

good to know that i will tell my friend to get good sata 3 with high iops over 100k. i think i7 5820k with x99 seem like better long term perspective with the possible upgrade path to broadwell-e/skylake-e. also what your your experience with sony vegas 

[Enderman]

good to know that i will tell my friend to get good sata 3 with high iops over 100k. i think i7 5820k with x99 seem like better long term perspective with the possible upgrade path to broadwell-e/skylake-e. also what your your experience with sony vegas 

broadwell-e may not be made at all since skylake is coming up and skylake-e will come soon after

and skylake-e will require a new socket

 

soo...it doesnt seem like there is an upgrade path for the next generation, but neither is there with 1150 since skylake also needs a new socket

 

sony vegas works well, smooth editing and lots of options

also not that hard to get a hang of

 

whenever i try to use GPU accelerated rendering it crashes though, so thats not too nice, but i doubt it would make a dig difference anyway

[Geno Boost]

broadwell-e may not be made at all since skylake is coming up and skylake-e will come soon after

and skylake-e will require a new socket

 

soo...it doesnt seem like there is an upgrade path for the next generation, but neither is there with 1150 since skylake also needs a new socket

 

sony vegas works well, smooth editing and lots of options

also not that hard to get a hang of

 

whenever i try to use GPU accelerated rendering it crashes though, so thats not too nice, but i doubt it would make a dig difference anyway

since there no upgrade path with x99 to new architectures  i think i7 6700k seem like better option to keep the cost down also for your gpu accleration do you use nvidia/amd or intel igpu for rendering