Jump to content

GTX 970

EcDarkSky

What is better ( i overclock) betwen the TUF GTX 970 and the inno3D ichill GTX 970

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is better ( i overclock) betwen the TUF GTX 970 and the inno3D ichill GTX 970

 

What is better ( i overclock) betwen the TUF GTX 970 and the inno3D ichill GTX 970

Now way to say as all chips have a different purity and therefore different overclocking capability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you can make reasonable assessments. You can look at things like power delivery, the cooler, and binning process. It's not completely random.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you can make reasonable assessments. You can look at things like power delivery, the cooler, and binning process. It's not completely random.

 

The difference won't be night and day though. There's no real guarantee of better overclocks, so just go for the one which is better in relation to othertomperson's suggestions, and obviously factor price in somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't tell between those two cards because it's random. If you want better overclocking go with gigabytes g1 which is binned. Performance is still marginally better, go for whichever brand you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Between this 2 I would buy the Galax HOF, but if you want the best at all for OC, I recommend the Gigabyte G1 Gaming.

Sorry for my bad english.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the ichill. i've heard nothing but good things of that card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go with the G1 Gaming, it has the highest (I think) factory OCed 970 out of the box and on top of that I was able to OC it to +150 core +200 memory at 60v.

I love free stuff.

GTX 970 with pseudo 4gb vram at pseudo 224gb/s at pseudo  256-bit with 56 ROPs (corrected from 64) and 1.75mb L2 cache (corrected from 2mb).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×