Jump to content

Overclocking monitors and future g-sync/freesync?

Just coming here to ponder over and present an idea that surely has been proposed a lot of times -

 

So far I have been hesitant to overclock my 60 hz 1440p IPS monitor. I'm afraid that it could break as I've read has happened on the internet even when overclocking only 2-3 hertz more than the limit. Some games probably don't even support weird, non-standard refresh rates.

So my first question, when overclocking a monitor, does internal components get hotter as when overclocking other components or is it something with like the incoming data not being able to be handled that fast or something?

 

Because if it is due to heat issues, g-sync and/or freesync could add a feature to make their thing even awesomer.

 

Say you bought a super nice 144hz g-sync enabled monitor, as well the top of the line newest gpu.

Since the framerate goes up and drops naturally when rendering a game, gaming on your new, powerful gpu finds your puny game graphics easily rendered at 160-170 hertz in some areas. So your monitor adapts and refreshes at 160-170 hertz.

After two minutes of rendering at 160 hertz the monitor goes "hey there, give me a break here, I was only made for refreshing at 144hz! chill off for a bit."

The graphics card gets the message and underclocks itself to run the game at around 144 hertz cooling the internal components of the monitor and itself, as well as conserving power.

Later on, the monitor is ready again and goes 160 hertz when available.

 

This situation would only happen if the graphics card was too powerful for the game graphics, if the game demanded more of the gpu and it worked hard through areas at 120hertz, the monitor would cool faster and underclocking the gpu would not be needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbo Boost for monitors!

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just coming here to ponder over and present an idea that surely has been proposed a lot of times -

 

So far I have been hesitant to overclock my 60 hz 1440p IPS display. I'm afraid that it could break as I've read has happened on the internet even when overclocking only 2-3 hertz more than the limit. Some games probably don't even support weird, non-standard refresh rates.

So my first question, when overclocking a monitor, does internal components get hotter as when overclocking other components or is it something with like the incoming data not being able to be handled that fast or something?

 

Because if it is due to heat issues, g-sync and/or freesync could add a feature to make their thing even awesomer.

 

Say you bought a super nice 144hz g-sync enabled monitor, as well the top of the line newest gpu.

Since the framerate goes up and drops naturally when rendering a game, gaming on your new, powerful gpu finds your puny game graphics easily rendered at 160-170 hertz in some areas. So your monitor adapts and refreshes at 160-170 hertz.

After two minutes of rendering at 160 hertz the monitor goes "hey there, give me a break here, I was only made for refreshing at 144hz! chill off for a bit."

The graphics card gets the message and underclocks itself to run the game at around 144 hertz cooling the internal components of the monitor and itself, as well as conserving power.

Later on, the monitor is ready again and goes 160 hertz when available.

 

This situation would only happen if the graphics card was too powerful for the game graphics, if the game demanded more of the gpu and it worked hard through areas at 120hertz, the monitor would cool faster and underclocking the gpu would not be needed.

i have ine up to 74 and it works fine although if you go above the limit the screen will black out and then your lower it by 1 hz

Please follow your topics guys, it's very important! CoC F.A.Q  Please use the corresponding PC part picker link for your country USA, UK, Canada, AustraliaSpain, Italy, New Zealand and Germany

also if you find anyone with this handle in games its most likely me so say hi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my ASUS PB278Q to 85hrz lol.

 

You're going to permanently damage it if you don't be careful.

 

@mStuff g-sync is a flop. It's definitely not worth the premium over the others.

i7 7700k @ 4.9ghz | Asus Maximus IX Hero | G.skill 32gb @ 3200 | Gtx 1080 classified | In win 909 | Samsung 960 pro 1tb | WD caviar blue 1tb x3 | Dell u3417w | Corsair H115i | Ducky premier dk9008p (mx reds) | Logitech g900 | Sennheiser hd 800s w/ hdvd 800 | Audioengine a5+ w/ s8

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my ASUS PB278Q to 85hrz lol.

I have that monitor as well, maybe 65 hertz is safe enough, still a bit scared though. 70 hertz? even scarier.

 

the 5-10 fps difference will surely be almost unnoticeable, is it worth it? I actually don't know. Probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×