Jump to content

So I guess Xbox One won't allow us to play our old games in any way.. GEEGEE Microsoft you EA'd it.

 

The Xbox One won't play Xbox 360 discs or XBLA games, and that doesn't really bother Microsoft Head of Interactive Entertainment Business Don Mattrick.

"If you're backwards compatible, you're really backwards," he told the Wall Street Journal.

Mattrick said only 5 percent of customers play games from previous generations on new consoles, so spending time to make that possible isn't worth it. Sony's PlayStation 4 isn't backward compatible from a hardware standpoint, but with cloud service Gaikai, it should offer a way to play games from the PS3 and older consoles.

It's been eight years since the previous generation transition, meaning players have had longer than ever to build up their libraries. That's a lot to lose – and even more so with the onset of downloadable games in the middle of this generation.

 

Source:

http://www.joystiq.com/2013/05/22/don-mattrick-if-youre-backwards-compatible-youre-really-bac/

 

 

*If this has been posted again I couldn't find it. Please use tags.

"Save the cheerleader, save the world- Hiro Nakamura


 


The hero LinusTechTips forum deserves, but not the one it needs.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/18840-xbox-one-no-backwards-compatibility/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5%? I think the number is higher than that.

"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out." - Carl Sagan.

"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you" - Edward I. Koch

"I didn't die! I performed a tactical reset!" - Apollolol

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not compatible at a hardware level since it's now based on the x86 architecture... they just didn't bother to make an emulator for them like PS4 did.  I guess they can always do that in the future though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do I.. But who are we to argue with Microsoft? failfish.png

I don't really like Sony's way of BC, but it's better than Microsoft's way of doing things, who is scrapping it altogether.

"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out." - Carl Sagan.

"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you" - Edward I. Koch

"I didn't die! I performed a tactical reset!" - Apollolol

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not compatible at a hardware level since it's now based on the x86 architecture... they just didn't bother to make an emulator for them like PS4 did.  I guess they can always do that in the future though...

They could still incorporate the 360 hardware though, right? Like Sony did with the original PS3. Incorporating PS2 hardware.

"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out." - Carl Sagan.

"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you" - Edward I. Koch

"I didn't die! I performed a tactical reset!" - Apollolol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have herd that if you will want to play xbox 360 games on the xbox 1 you will have to get a 150 dollar adlinus-meme-6.jpg

 

d on witch is basically a xbox 360 inside.

Could you say Xbox One, instead of Xbox 1? Makes me think of the original Xbox.

"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out." - Carl Sagan.

"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you" - Edward I. Koch

"I didn't die! I performed a tactical reset!" - Apollolol

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is expected, there really isn't an elegant way to port PowerPC based games to the x86 architecture. Developers are free to remake their games for Xbox One if they want, but as far as making a 360 disc playable in the One they would have to basically put a 360 inside the thing to give it even the remote chance of happening. Just keep your xbox 360s guys. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could still incorporate the 360 hardware though, right? Like Sony did with the original PS3. Incorporating PS2 hardware.

yes, but that would be rather expensive and didn't work very well anyway. you're better off keeping your 360. besides, with new consoles coming out you'll likely be able to get a used 360 for less than the cost of putting 360 hardware in the One. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, but that would be rather expensive and didn't work very well anyway. you're better off keeping your 360. besides, with new consoles coming out you'll likely be able to get a used 360 for less than the cost of putting 360 hardware in the One. 

True that. I'd say the console itself is pretty cheap new anyway as it is. Getting a new one when the Xbox One comes out will be even easier. 

"Save the cheerleader, save the world- Hiro Nakamura


 


The hero LinusTechTips forum deserves, but not the one it needs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can totally understand the lack of 'hardware' backwards compatibly, its a totally different architecture.

Xbox 360's will be around for a LONG time, people who game on the 360 would have gathered an extensive game library they would want to keep playing.

Good thing is that 360's will be dirt cheap soon enough for people who would want to get one for one reason or another.

PC SYSTEM: Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 / i5 2500k @ 4.2ghz / CM Hyper 212 EVO / Gigabyte 670 OC SLI / MSI P67A-GD53 B3 / Kingston HyperX Blue 8Gb / 

WD 2tb Storage Drive / BenQ GW2750HM - ASUS VE248H - Panasonic TX-P42ST60BCorsair AX750 / Logitech K360 / Razer Naga / Plantronics Gamecom 380 /

Asus Xonar DGX / Samsung 830 256gb / MEDIA eMachine ER1401 running OpenELEC XBMC with Seagate STBV3000200 3TB Hard Drive - Panasonic TX-P42ST60B

Link to post
Share on other sites

I normally game on my pc..and Im not going to make my judgement JUST yet...but at this point I would have to say:

 

-The best things of the ps4 are the features the xbox One has...that the Ps4 doesn't.-

 

I'll still wait for E3 to make my final opinion on the subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the fact that the system is x86 pretty much makes it impossible to be backwards compatable with a PowerPC system without pretty much building in a 360 like how the original PS3 did. Although, I bet it could run original Xbox games if anyone cared.

Old shit no one cares about but me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the fact that the system is x86 pretty much makes it impossible to be backwards compatable with a PowerPC system without pretty much building in a 360 like how the original PS3 did. Although, I bet it could run original Xbox games if anyone cared.

I disagree. The PS3 was way different compared to the PSOne and PS2, but Sony certainly managed to build a decent emulator. We also got PS2 and PSOne emulators on PC - maybe not exactly the way it was originally, but still, we got them. I think MS could make a decent one at least.

"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out." - Carl Sagan.

"I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you" - Edward I. Koch

"I didn't die! I performed a tactical reset!" - Apollolol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the fact that the system is x86 pretty much makes it impossible to be backwards compatable with a PowerPC system without pretty much building in a 360 like how the original PS3 did. Although, I bet it could run original Xbox games if anyone cared.

Adam Sessler mentioned this I believe, it really depends on if Microsoft chooses to support it and if they choose to have support for hardware that far back. Windows is coded to run 32 or 64 bit applications because it's a pc and we expect 32 bit programs to work, however 16 bit programs don't work. with 8 GB of ram the new Xbox is obviously going to be 64 bit, so it will depend on if they chose to code 32 bit support in to the OS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree. The PS3 was way different compared to the PSOne and PS2, but Sony certainly managed to build a decent emulator. We also got PS2 and PSOne emulators on PC - maybe not exactly the way it was originally, but still, we got them. I think MS could make a decent one at least.

In no one was Sony's PS2 backwards compatibility solution decent, it only worked with a select few games and even then they were having massive problems with it. Developers were releasing updates to games they hadn't worked on it years just to try and make them stable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree. The PS3 was way different compared to the PSOne and PS2, but Sony certainly managed to build a decent emulator. We also got PS2 and PSOne emulators on PC - maybe not exactly the way it was originally, but still, we got them. I think MS could make a decent one at least.

The original PS3 had the physical PS2 hardware in it to play the PS2 games, and also the PS2 was also PPC so it didn't require that much power to emulate it by software. The PS1 is old enough to be emulated by whatever really.

 

Heck there aren't any good 360 or ps3 emulators on PCs yet.

Old shit no one cares about but me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original PS3 had the physical PS2 hardware in it to play the PS2 games, and also the PS2 was also PPC so it didn't require that much power to emulate it by software. The PS1 is old enough to be emulated by whatever really.

 

Heck there aren't any good 360 or ps3 emulators on PCs yet.

The architecures were different from PS2 to PS3. PS2 was "emotion engine" PS3 was ARM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam Sessler mentioned this I believe, it really depends on if Microsoft chooses to support it and if they choose to have support for hardware that far back. Windows is coded to run 32 or 64 bit applications because it's a pc and we expect 32 bit programs to work, however 16 bit programs don't work. with 8 GB of ram the new Xbox is obviously going to be 64 bit, so it will depend on if they chose to code 32 bit support in to the OS

 

I bet you there will be 32 bit code support on the Xbox One, since its built with basically all netbook/notebook cpu/gpu. At least with Indie games and stuff that doesn't need 8gb of ram.

Old shit no one cares about but me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a non issue, just keep your old console. I Still got my n64, and didn't whinge about lack of playability on the gamecube.
people will say my argument is invalid cause cartridges to disc, i say PPC to x86
The difference is just as major.

Rig 1 CPU: 3570K Motherboard: V Gene GPU: Power Color r9 280x at 1.35GHZ  RAM: 16 GB 1600mhz PSU: Cougar CMX 700W Storage: 1x Plexor M5S 256GB 1x 1TB HDD 1x 3TB GREEN HDD Case: Coolermaster HAFXB Cooling: Intel Watercooler
"My day so far, I've fixed 4 computers and caught a dog. Australian Tech Industry is weird."

"It's bent so far to the right, It's a hook."

Link to post
Share on other sites

The architecures were different from PS2 to PS3. PS2 was "emotion engine" PS3 was ARM

The PS3 is not ARM, the PS3 is PPC based. Emotion Engine is not an architecture, Its the name of the CPU/GPU. The CPU is based on PPC IIRC. 

 

Its like saying the gamecube had "Gekko" architecture. 

Old shit no one cares about but me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×