Jump to content

WiFi running slower than expected

desdby

Hello, my regular WiFi connection is supposed to be around 500 mb/s. Usually, my computer run it at around 200 mb/s. My antenna is facing right towards the satellite (I have a mesh system).

Here's what I've tried:
 

  • Force link speed to be higher than 100 mb/s.
  • Restart the computer.
  • Remove background apps.

Help.

 

image.png.7a48ae41b635252bad3d1877dfd8eafb.pngimage.png.03fef3c64711377d95c30c2807126745.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, desdby said:

Hello, my regular WiFi connection is supposed to be around 500 mb/s. Usually, my computer run it at around 200 mb/s. My antenna is facing right towards the satellite (I have a mesh system).

Here's what I've tried:
 

  • Force link speed to be higher than 100 mb/s.
  • Restart the computer.
  • Remove background apps.

Help.

 

image.png.7a48ae41b635252bad3d1877dfd8eafb.pngimage.png.03fef3c64711377d95c30c2807126745.png

Firstly, there is no such thing as "supposed to be" on WiFi, conditions change all the time.

 

What do you even mean by "force link speed"?  You can't force the link speed on WiFi and clearly if you're getting 233Mbit the speed between the mesh nodes is already over 100Mbit.

 

Does the satellite have ethernet ports you can temporarily plugging into to see if the problem is between the mesh nodes?

 

Are the mesh modes connected wirelessly and do they have a dedicated backhaul channel?  If not, the connection from the second node will be half of what you get from the main node as they will be sharing the same channel to both talk to the main node and send data to your PC.

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz)
WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz) Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~800Mbit down, 115Mbit up)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, desdby said:

(I have a mesh system)

What make and model is your mesh network comprised of?

 

Keep in mind that using wireless back haul will adversely affect the speed of your client devices as some of that bandwidth is used for connecting the nodes together. This is especially noticeable on dual band mesh systems. On tri-band mesh systems, this effect is hardly noticeable.

 

What you can do is try taking all child nodes offline and then running a speed test connected to just the main node. If your speeds improve, you can safely say that the slowdown is due to the wireless connection between your other nodes.

Laptop: 2019 16" MacBook Pro i7, 512GB, 5300M 4GB, 16GB DDR4 | Phone: iPhone 13 Pro Max 128GB | Wearables: Apple Watch SE | Car: 2007 Ford Taurus SE | CPU: R7 5700X | Mobo: ASRock B450M Pro4 | RAM: 32GB 3200 | GPU: ASRock RX 5700 8GB | Case: Apple PowerMac G5 | OS: Win 11 | Storage: 1TB Crucial P3 NVME SSD, 1TB PNY CS900, & 4TB WD Blue HDD | PSU: Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 600W | Display: LG 27GL83A-B 1440p @ 144Hz, Dell S2719DGF 1440p @144Hz | Cooling: Wraith Prism | Keyboard: G610 Orion Cherry MX Brown | Mouse: G305 | Audio: Audio Technica ATH-M50X & Blue Snowball | Server: 2018 Core i3 Mac mini, 128GB SSD, Intel UHD 630, 16GB DDR4 | Storage: OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad (6TB WD Blue HDD, 12TB Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Crucial SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda HDD)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DrMacintosh said:

On tri-band mesh systems, this effect is hardly noticeable.

Its not even that simple, as WiFi 6e is tri-band but unless one of those is dedicated to backhaul, you're still sharing one of those bands.  You generally need two 5Ghz radios so you can dedicate one of those to backhaul, as while 6Ghz is more ideal, the shorter range may be a problem in using it for that.

This is why wiring your nodes if possible will always be the best option.

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz)
WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz) Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~800Mbit down, 115Mbit up)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alex Atkin UK said:

as WiFi 6e is tri-band but unless one of those is dedicated to backhaul, you're still sharing one of those bands.

I believe, at least with Linksys Products, their 6e devices will use the 6GHz band as their back haul. Their Wifi 6 devices should favor the second 5Ghz band (if available) but can allegedly dynamically use bits of all available bands.

Laptop: 2019 16" MacBook Pro i7, 512GB, 5300M 4GB, 16GB DDR4 | Phone: iPhone 13 Pro Max 128GB | Wearables: Apple Watch SE | Car: 2007 Ford Taurus SE | CPU: R7 5700X | Mobo: ASRock B450M Pro4 | RAM: 32GB 3200 | GPU: ASRock RX 5700 8GB | Case: Apple PowerMac G5 | OS: Win 11 | Storage: 1TB Crucial P3 NVME SSD, 1TB PNY CS900, & 4TB WD Blue HDD | PSU: Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 600W | Display: LG 27GL83A-B 1440p @ 144Hz, Dell S2719DGF 1440p @144Hz | Cooling: Wraith Prism | Keyboard: G610 Orion Cherry MX Brown | Mouse: G305 | Audio: Audio Technica ATH-M50X & Blue Snowball | Server: 2018 Core i3 Mac mini, 128GB SSD, Intel UHD 630, 16GB DDR4 | Storage: OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad (6TB WD Blue HDD, 12TB Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Crucial SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda HDD)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrMacintosh said:

I believe, at least with Linksys Products, their 6e devices will use the 6GHz band as their back haul. Their Wifi 6 devices should favor the second 5Ghz band (if available) but can allegedly dynamically use bits of all available bands.

It will be interesting to see how WiFi 7 changes this, given all bands can dynamically be used and each band can be split into smaller components.

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz)
WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz) Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~800Mbit down, 115Mbit up)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alex Atkin UK said:

Firstly, there is no such thing as "supposed to be" on WiFi, conditions change all the time.

 

What do you even mean by "force link speed"?  You can't force the link speed on WiFi and clearly if you're getting 233Mbit the speed between the mesh nodes is already over 100Mbit.

 

Does the satellite have ethernet ports you can temporarily plugging into to see if the problem is between the mesh nodes?

 

Are the mesh modes connected wirelessly and do they have a dedicated backhaul channel?  If not, the connection from the second node will be half of what you get from the main node as they will be sharing the same channel to both talk to the main node and send data to your PC.

My computer has gotten 500 mb/s before, once I restarted it something happened & it became much slower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, DrMacintosh said:

What make and model is your mesh network comprised of?

 

Keep in mind that using wireless back haul will adversely affect the speed of your client devices as some of that bandwidth is used for connecting the nodes together. This is especially noticeable on dual band mesh systems. On tri-band mesh systems, this effect is hardly noticeable.

 

What you can do is try taking all child nodes offline and then running a speed test connected to just the main node. If your speeds improve, you can safely say that the slowdown is due to the wireless connection between your other nodes.

It's a Eero system, WiFi 6. One router, one satellite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×