Jump to content

So my gf is studying Game Design, works with Blender and recently UE5. Shes currently using a GTX960, which ist struggeling hard. I already decided on a CPU for her to Upgrade to(Ryzen 5 1600x -> 7 5800x). Now the Thing is, i Heard AMD GPUs suck for professional workloads, but NVIDIA is so pricy(in Germany) and doesnt seem to offer good gaming Performance. Which GPU would you recommend?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1522595-help-which-gpu-to-choose/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Budget ?

AMD R9  7950X3D CPU/ Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E board/ 2x32GB G-Skill Trident Z Neo 6000CL30 RAM ASUS TUF Gaming AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX OC Edition GPU/ Phanteks P600S case /  Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360 ARGB cooler/  2TB WD SN850 NVme + 2TB Crucial T500  NVme  + 4TB Toshiba X300 HDD / Corsair RM850x PSU/ Alienware AW3420DW 34" 120Hz 3440x1440p monitor / ASUS ROG AZOTH keyboard/ Logitech G PRO X Superlight mouse / Audeze Maxwell headphones

Link to post
Share on other sites

Caution on the CPU upgrade depending on the MOBO it may be incompatible. A budget is essential for such things but an RTX GPU (and tons of RAM) will do wonders, speaking as someone currently working in Blender.

In search of the future, new tech, and exploring the universe! All under the cover of anonymity!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My recommendation is to go AMD, (and a CPU Upgrade isn't necessary but is recommended if you choose this path)

ioletsgo@Noir  
-------------  
OS: Arch Linux x86_64  
Host: MS-7D54 1.0  
Kernel: 6.4.6-arch1-1  
Uptime: 6 hours, 46 mins  
Packages: 938 (pacman)  
Shell: bash 5.1.16  
Resolution: 1920x1080  
DE: Plasma 5.27.6  
WM: kwin  
Theme: [Plasma], Breeze [GTK2/3]  
Icons: BeautyLine [Plasma], BeautyLine [GTK2/3]  
Terminal: konsole  
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (16) @ 3.400GHz  
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon RX 6400/6500 XT/6500M  
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT/6750 XT / 6800M/6850M XT  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ioletsgo said:

My recommendation is to go AMD, (and a CPU Upgrade isn't necessary but is recommended if you choose this path)

AMD runs like garbage on Blender example RTX 2080 = RX 6900 XT Nvidia has thrown the bank at optimizing for Blender it's not even close.

In search of the future, new tech, and exploring the universe! All under the cover of anonymity!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wh0_Am_1 said:

AMD runs like garbage on Blender example RTX 2080 = RX 6900 XT

Not true 

 

 

AMD R9  7950X3D CPU/ Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E board/ 2x32GB G-Skill Trident Z Neo 6000CL30 RAM ASUS TUF Gaming AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX OC Edition GPU/ Phanteks P600S case /  Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360 ARGB cooler/  2TB WD SN850 NVme + 2TB Crucial T500  NVme  + 4TB Toshiba X300 HDD / Corsair RM850x PSU/ Alienware AW3420DW 34" 120Hz 3440x1440p monitor / ASUS ROG AZOTH keyboard/ Logitech G PRO X Superlight mouse / Audeze Maxwell headphones

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wh0_Am_1 said:

AMD runs like garbage on Blender example RTX 2080 = RX 6900 XT

AMD's windows drivers have always been kind of meh, I hear that they've gotten a lot better in the past year. What might've necessarily been true in the past may not be true now.

To actually test the capabilities of an AMD GPU, I actually ran the Blender benchmarks on a Linux install, and these are my results.

image.thumb.png.d5c56bff87c835f7adb23383f0cf768f.png

It may not the the best but by god its better than nothing (And much cheaper than anything beyond it), if you want a budget program with graphics rendering capabilities, AMD IS an option.

ioletsgo@Noir  
-------------  
OS: Arch Linux x86_64  
Host: MS-7D54 1.0  
Kernel: 6.4.6-arch1-1  
Uptime: 6 hours, 46 mins  
Packages: 938 (pacman)  
Shell: bash 5.1.16  
Resolution: 1920x1080  
DE: Plasma 5.27.6  
WM: kwin  
Theme: [Plasma], Breeze [GTK2/3]  
Icons: BeautyLine [Plasma], BeautyLine [GTK2/3]  
Terminal: konsole  
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (16) @ 3.400GHz  
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon RX 6400/6500 XT/6500M  
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT/6750 XT / 6800M/6850M XT  

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PDifolco said:

Not true 

 

 

I was referencing Blender open data :

Device Name    Median Score    Number of Benchmarks
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT    2592.71

   

35

 

 

 

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080   2634.84              11

 

The video was also before widespread rollout of optix it was still in beta at the time

 

This data is based off of the latest release of Blender

 

 

In search of the future, new tech, and exploring the universe! All under the cover of anonymity!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When we're talking about GPUs, we have to consider the prices while discussing the benchmarks, and I've found that AMD, while not giving you the highs of performance, gives you much better bang for your buck.

ioletsgo@Noir  
-------------  
OS: Arch Linux x86_64  
Host: MS-7D54 1.0  
Kernel: 6.4.6-arch1-1  
Uptime: 6 hours, 46 mins  
Packages: 938 (pacman)  
Shell: bash 5.1.16  
Resolution: 1920x1080  
DE: Plasma 5.27.6  
WM: kwin  
Theme: [Plasma], Breeze [GTK2/3]  
Icons: BeautyLine [Plasma], BeautyLine [GTK2/3]  
Terminal: konsole  
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (16) @ 3.400GHz  
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon RX 6400/6500 XT/6500M  
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT/6750 XT / 6800M/6850M XT  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I benchmarked my 6950XT in Blender just a few days ago and it was comparable to a 3060Ti. I don't know what bang for the buck @ioletsgo  is  talking about but for Blender specifically going with AMD is a big mistake IMO.

edit: Here's the screenshot, as you can see without context 2765 looks good, but when you see what's above me it starts to look a little bit different:

image.thumb.png.991624340c37a119eead7f7612cdd000.png

Ada is worse than Ampere which is worse than Fermi, change my mind.

System:

Spoiler
  • CPU
    AMD Ryzen 9 5950x
  • Motherboard
    ASUS X570 TUF
  • RAM
    2X16GB Kingston Fury 3200mhz
  • GPU
    Gigabyte RTX 4080 Super Gaming OC
  • Case
    Fractal Torrent
  • Storage
    A lot of SSDs
  • PSU
    Seasonic 1000W Platinum
  • Display(s)
    Main: ASUS PG27AQDM 240hz 1440p WOLED
    Secondary: Alienware AW2521HF 1080p 240hz
    Third: Samsung C34F791 UltraWide 1440p 100hz
    Fourth: LG 48' C2 OLED TV
  • Cooling
    Noctua NH-D15
  • Keyboard
    Ducky Shine 7
  • Mouse
    GPX Superlight
  • Sound
    Logitech Z906 / Sennheiser 560s / Rode NT-USB
  • Operating System
    Windows 11 Pro

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Quadratschaedel said:

So my gf is studying Game Design, works with Blender and recently UE5. Shes currently using a GTX960, which ist struggeling hard. I already decided on a CPU for her to Upgrade to(Ryzen 5 1600x -> 7 5800x). Now the Thing is, i Heard AMD GPUs suck for professional workloads, but NVIDIA is so pricy(in Germany) and doesnt seem to offer good gaming Performance. Which GPU would you recommend?

I don't know how the market is in your part of the world, but maybe a used GPU may be better bang for the buck.

Gaming With a 4:3 CRT

System specs below

 

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X with a Noctua NH-U9S cooler 
Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 Aorus M (Because it was cheap)
RAM: 32GB (4 x 8GB) Corsair Vengance LPX 3200Mhz CL16
GPU: EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC Blower Card
HDD: 7200RPM TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB, External HDD: 5400RPM 2TB WD My Passport
SSD: 1tb Samsung 970 evo m.2 nvme
PSU: Corsair CX650M
Displays: ViewSonic VA2012WB LCD 1680x1050p @ 75Hz
Gateway VX920 CRT: 1600x1200@75Hz, 1200x900@100Hz, 960x720@125Hz, 800x600@140Hz
Gateway VX900 CRT: 1600x1200@75Hz, 1200x900@100Hz, 960x720@120Hz (Can be pushed to 175Hz)
 
Keyboard: Thermaltake eSPORTS MEKA PRO with Cherry MX Red switches
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, MadAnt250 said:

I don't know how the market is in your part of the world, but maybe a used GPU may be better bang for the buck.

That's what I would do.   The OP hasn't replied with any feedback despite a number of ppl trying to help.

I've researched Blender and gpus/comparisons - and I used opendata Blender website like one of the guys who posted above.   An nvidia card is more reliable for Blender - at least, right now.   I will recommend to the OP to look at the used card market for a Nvidia card - 3060 for e.g.   

Sure, if buying new - and the AMD cards are a better 'deal' in comparison, sure - but, at the moment, in Blender, the AMD cards are slower - there's some complaints about using them - in Blender - so, read up on that.   Nvidia has had a head start in Blender use - Optix is mature and is much faster than HIP.   AMD is trying to introduce HIP-RT - which utilizes ray tracing - and speeds up performance - and it looks like it might be pretty good - but, it's not ready yet.   It's still in an 'experimental' phase and is at the moment, Windows only.   There's probably some issues with stability (possibly, crashes etc.).   The latest version of Blender recently released (3.6) and hip/hip-rt progressed to a new version - so, that combination will probably take a while to stabilize - i.e. work properly?   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×