Jump to content

Because IPC really isn't a number, well it kind of is, but nothing the consumer would understand

[AMD Athlon 64 Mobile 4000+ Socket 754 | Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 | OCZ 2GB DDR PC3200 | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB AGP | 850 Evo | Seasonic 430W | Win XP/10]

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

really??? how

it kind of is, but it's vastly too complicated to be understood by a consumer

[AMD Athlon 64 Mobile 4000+ Socket 754 | Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 | OCZ 2GB DDR PC3200 | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB AGP | 850 Evo | Seasonic 430W | Win XP/10]

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They made horsepower and Megahertz understandable...

Well come up with something then...

[AMD Athlon 64 Mobile 4000+ Socket 754 | Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 | OCZ 2GB DDR PC3200 | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB AGP | 850 Evo | Seasonic 430W | Win XP/10]

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because Intel doesn't need to do it because we all know their IPC is better than AMD's and AMD won't do it because everyone knows their IPC is crap compared to Intel.

-The Bellerophon- Obsidian 550D-i5-3570k@4.5Ghz -Asus Sabertooth Z77-16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 1866Mhz-x2 EVGA GTX 760 Dual FTW 4GB-Creative Sound Blaster XF-i Titanium-OCZ Vertex Plus 120GB-Seagate Barracuda 2TB- https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/60154-the-not-really-a-build-log-build-log/ Twofold http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/121043-twofold-a-dual-itx-system/ How great is EVGA? http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/110662-evga-how-great-are-they/#entry1478299

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basic theoretical spiel I just made up.

 

Instructions per clock (although I don't use any form of Mhz/Ghz comparisons, just a more is better situation)

 

The Computer computes with micro code being 1's and 0's, at the most basic levels of computing, you could call these the CPU instructions

The Programs you run have varied amount of 1's and 0's to compute when you do things,

like doing small math's workloads/predictions/interactions to get the achieved perfect result, "your intended interactions with your computer"

The different CPU's available all run at different speeds within the chip, and with varied power levels within the range as well.

The better CPU's can provide more 1's and 0's in lesser time than lesser capable CPU's and your programs/workload will get done faster.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basic theoretical spiel I just made up.

 

Instructions per clock (although I don't use any form of Mhz/Ghz comparisons, just a more is better situation)

 

The Computer computes with micro code being 1's and 0's, at the most basic levels of computing, you could call these the CPU instructions

The Programs you run have varied amount of 1's and 0's to compute when you do things,

like doing small math's workloads/predictions/interactions to get the achieved perfect result, "your intended interactions with your computer"

The different CPU's available all run at different speeds within the chip, and with varied power levels within the range as well.

The better CPU's can provide more 1's and 0's in lesser time than lesser capable CPU's and your programs/workload will get done faster.

Any ideas to market this into something that any idiot could understand?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×