A Litte Help here!

[squzzly]

Budget (including currency): 300+ €

Country: Portugal

Games, programs or workloads that it will be used for: CyberPunk and many other popular games

Other details (existing parts lists, whether any peripherals are needed, what you're upgrading from, when you're going to buy, what resolution and refresh rate you want to play at, etc): Im deciding if i should switch my gt710 to a INNO3D GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER TWIN or a PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6600 8gb GDDR6.

I HAVE A i3-10100f(processor) and a ASRock h470m-hvs (motherboard) and idk if they are going to have good compability with my motherboard and processor 

 

[Middcore]

The 6600 is a significantly faster card.

 

I'm not really sure what you mean about compatibility. If this is a "bottleneck" fear then forget that nonsense, just buy the best GPU you can afford on your budget. 

[Eigenvektor]

The RX 6600 should be the faster card and technically even supports ray tracing, though it's too slow to be used in most games.

[Senzelian]

Compatible? Yup, no problem!

 

CPU-Bottleneck? Well, not sure, but I would assume it's fine. The 10100F is a pretty capable CPU.

[squzzly]

14 minutes ago, Eigenvektor said:

The RX 6600 should be the faster card and technically even supports ray tracing, though it's too slow to be used in most games.

what you mean with slow? @Eigenvektor

[podkall]

3 minutes ago, squzzly said:

what you mean with slow?

Old AMD Cards run slower with RayTracing on, but about the same without RayTracing

 

Nvidia is just better at RayTracing, RTX cards that is...

 

RayTracing has nothing to do with running games, only if you turn on RayTracing in those games, which Cyberpunk has... but it's a quality you don't really need.

[squzzly]

1 minute ago, podkall said:

Old AMD Cards run slower with RayTracing on, but about the same without RayTracing

 

Nvidia is just better at RayTracing, RTX cards that is...

 

RayTracing has nothing to do with running games, only if you turn on RayTracing in those games, which Cyberpunk has... but it's a quality you don't really need.

i dont really care about raytracing (ofc i would to use it but) its not my main focus. For me, if i have good quality like (can i play with High-Ultra Settings)if yes im happy with it @podkall

[Eigenvektor]

19 minutes ago, squzzly said:

what you mean with slow? @Eigenvektor

I was only talking about RT there. It can technically do ray tracing, but it is too slow to actually use that setting in most games (that support it). It is fine for rasterized performance. Just in case you're thinking about using it for RT in CP 2077.

 

10 minutes ago, squzzly said:

For me, if i have good quality like (can i play with High-Ultra Settings)if yes im happy with it @podkall

I own a RX 6600 but I don't have CP 2077 to test. What resolution do you plan to play at? I have a 1440p monitor. High can often be done, but you may want Medium for better performance for some settings.

[squzzly]

30 minutes ago, Eigenvektor said:

I was only talking about RT there. It can technically do ray tracing, but it is too slow to actually use that setting in most games (that support it). It is fine for rasterized performance. Just in case you're thinking about using it for RT in CP 2077.

 

I own a RX 6600 but I don't have CP 2077 to test. What resolution do you plan to play at? I have a 1440p monitor. High can often be done, but you may want Medium for better performance for some settings.

i will play on full hd / 1080p , 60 HZ Monitor. 90 fps for me its enough