Jump to content

Thinking of upgrading my PC, should I?

boozerc
Go to solution Solved by leo1798,
1 minute ago, boozerc said:

Mainly for gaming. Maybe a few simulation tools here and there for work: Xilinx and OrCAD. 

 

 

Currently gaming on 3440x1440 120Hz. 

 

 

Thank you for the RAM recommendation. I also thought about getting a 4790k as Juular said above, but I might as well get on the newer platforms.  

Yeah I'd definitely go with Ryzen because you don't need the 9900k for the niche 1080p 240Hz gaming use-case. I'd also recommend just doing a full platform upgrade because older i7's are overpriced anyways because people know that they can charge more and still have it be cheaper than a full platform upgrade.

Currently looking at the following parts:

 

INTEL: https://www.microcenter.com/site/content/custom-pc-builder.aspx?load=8f4726f1-2447-4c2d-acfc-4b0d4d14b2e9

AMD: https://www.microcenter.com/site/content/custom-pc-builder.aspx?load=99692cd0-19f4-4209-9916-b7410577c3cb

 

This is my current system:
 

  • CPU
    Intel Core i5-4690K
  • Motherboard
    MSI Z97 Gaming 3
  • RAM
    Corsair Vengeance 16 Gb 1600 Mhz
  • GPU
    EVGA - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB FTW3
  • Case
    Fractal Design - Define S
  • Storage
    128Gb Samsung 840, 1Tb Samsung 860 EVO, 1Tb WD Black
  • PSU
    Corsair RM650
  • Cooling
    Noctua - NH-D15S
     
     
    Any opinios, suggestions and/or thoughts? Thank you in advance!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For gaming ? For the same-ish price, comparing i9 9900k and AMD R9 3900X, Intel will be way ahead. But you don't need neither motherboard so expensive, get Gigabyte Pro WiFi, nor 32GB RAM for gaming. But i'm actually not sure if it worth it, i'd suggest getting i7 4770k\4790k on eBay and OC'ing the shit out of it, it will be maybe 15-20% slower than i9 9900k in games but costs way less. Also, delidding it would help with thermals.

Tag or quote me so i see your reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well,

do you want all out 1080p high refresh gaming or do you want to sacrifice a couple of FPS for more cores so you can do stuff like video editing better?

My Gaming PC:
Inno3D iChill Black - RTX 4080 - +500 Memory, undervolted Core, 2xCorsair QX120 (push) + 2xInno3D 120mm (pull)
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - NZXT x72
G.SKILL Trident Z @6000MHz CL30 - 2x16GB
Asus Strix X670E-E Gaming

1x500GB Samsung 960 Pro (Windows 11 + 10)

1x2TB Kingston KC3000 (Games)

1x1TB WD Blue SN550 (Programs)

1x1TB Samsung 870 EVO (Programs)
Corsair RM-850X + native 12VHPWR-Cable

Lian Li O11 Vision
Alienware 360 HZ QD-OLED AW2725DF, MSI Optix MAG274QRFDE-QD, BenQ ZOWIE XL2720

Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight 2
Wooting 60HE

Audeze LCD2-C + FiiO K3

Klipsch RP600-M + Klipsch R-120 SW

 

My Notebook:

MacBook Pro 16 M1 Pro - 16GB

 

Proxmox-Cluster:

  • Ryzen 9 3950X, Asus Strix X570E F-Gaming, 4x32GB3200MHz ECC, 2x 512GB NVMe ZFS-Mirror (Boot, Testing-VMs + TrueNAS L2ARC), 2x14TB ZFS-Mirror + 1x3TB (TrueNAS-VM), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), Dual 10G NIC (Ceph), 2.5G NIC (VMs), 1G NIC (Cluster)
  • i7 8700k delidded undervolted, Gigabyte Z390 UD, 4x16GB 3200MHz, 2x 360GB HDD ZFS-Mirror (Boot), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), Dual 10G NIC (Ceph), 2.5G NIC (VMs), 1G NIC (Cluster)
  • i5 4670, 3x4GB + 1x8GB 1600MHz, 2x 240GB HDD ZFS-Mirror (Boot), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), Dual 10G NIC (Ceph), 2.5G NIC (VMs), 1G NIC (Cluster)

Proxmox-Backup-Server:

  • i5 4670, 4x4GB 1600MHz, 2x2TB ZFS-Mirror, 2,5G NIC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Your CPU is currently a huge bottleneck and will only get worse as applications and games require more and more threads. Depending on your budget, you can either snag an i7 for the same platform as a short-term band-aid, or you could pony up and get one of the platforms that you have selected. I'd reccomend going with the 3900x because it's within 5% of the 9900k when tested across a wide variety of games and you can close the gap even further by using the Ryzen DRAM calculator (source: Hardware Unboxed). In everything else, excluding photoshop and a few older applications, it will stomp all over the 9900k. I'd also recommend going with a 32GB Crucial Ballistix kit instead of the Corsair one as it uses Micron E-Die and overclocks better (Or a kit of G.Skill Flare X which uses Samsung B-Die). Or you could just get the 3700x and save a bit because 12 cores is a bit excessive and you don't lose much gaming performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.8Ghz w/ Arctic Freezer 33 Tower Cooler | MSI B450 Tomahawk |  32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3200MHz CAS 14 

Sapphire RX 5700XT Pulse | EVGA 650w GQ 80+ Gold Semi-Modular  |  XPG SX6000 512GB Nvme SSD | NZXT H500

Acer XF270HU - 1440p 144Hz Freeesync IPS | Corsair Strafe - Cherry MX Red  |  Logitech G502

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Juular said:

For gaming ? For the same-ish price, comparing i9 9900k and AMD R9 3900X, Intel will be way ahead. But you don't need neither motherboard so expensive, get Gigabyte Pro WiFi, nor 32GB RAM for gaming. But i'm actually not sure if it worth it, i'd suggest getting i7 4770k\4790k on eBay and OC'ing the shit out of it, it will be maybe 15-20% slower than i9 9900k in games but costs way less. Also, delidding it would help with thermals.

Mainly for gaming. Maybe a few simulation tools here and there for work: Xilinx and OrCAD. 

 

 

12 minutes ago, Noah0302 said:

Well,

do you want all out 1080p high refresh gaming or do you want to sacrifice a couple of FPS for more cores so you can do stuff like video editing better?

Currently gaming on 3440x1440 120Hz. 

 

 

1 minute ago, leo1798 said:

 

Your CPU is currently a huge bottleneck and will only get worse as applications and games require more and more threads. Depending on your budget, you can either snag an i7 for the same platform as a short-term band-aid, or you could pony up and get one of the platforms that you have selected. I'd reccomend going with the 3900x because it's within 5% of the 9900k when tested across a wide variety of games and you can close the gap even further by using the Ryzen DRAM calculator (source: Hardware Unboxed). In everything else, excluding photoshop and a few older applications, it will stomp all over the 9900k. I'd also recommend going with a 32GB Crucial Ballistix kit instead of the Corsair one as it uses Micron E-Die and overclocks better.

Thank you for the RAM recommendation. I also thought about getting a 4790k as Juular said above, but I might as well get on the newer platforms.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, boozerc said:

Mainly for gaming. Maybe a few simulation tools here and there for work: Xilinx and OrCAD. 

 

 

Currently gaming on 3440x1440 120Hz. 

 

 

Thank you for the RAM recommendation. I also thought about getting a 4790k as Juular said above, but I might as well get on the newer platforms.  

Yeah I'd definitely go with Ryzen because you don't need the 9900k for the niche 1080p 240Hz gaming use-case. I'd also recommend just doing a full platform upgrade because older i7's are overpriced anyways because people know that they can charge more and still have it be cheaper than a full platform upgrade.

Ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.8Ghz w/ Arctic Freezer 33 Tower Cooler | MSI B450 Tomahawk |  32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3200MHz CAS 14 

Sapphire RX 5700XT Pulse | EVGA 650w GQ 80+ Gold Semi-Modular  |  XPG SX6000 512GB Nvme SSD | NZXT H500

Acer XF270HU - 1440p 144Hz Freeesync IPS | Corsair Strafe - Cherry MX Red  |  Logitech G502

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×