Jump to content

 

I don't follow the poster on twitter, but they have been known to leak stuff in the past. This looks like an Intel CPU, with 4 dies in it? In the linked video on bilibili you can also see the LGA on the opposite side. I haven't had a chance to take a closer look at it yet.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, MSI Ventus 3x OC RTX 5070 Ti, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Alienware AW3225QF (32" 240 Hz OLED)
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 4070 FE, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, iiyama ProLite XU2793QSU-B6 (27" 1440p 100 Hz)
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1130250-intel-going-chiplet/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Dissitesuxba11s said:

If this is real, then we can only have thank AMD for pushing them forward. 

 

I don't know what core/thread count they plan to go up to but I wonder if they would have to go to a larger IHS akin to the one on the W-3175X.

There's a lot of unknowns for now.

 

We could estimate a size and compare to known products. I'll have to poke through the video later and estimate the pad count, and see if that aligns with anything else known or rumoured.

 

What could each of those 4 blocks be? Are they the same, or different function?

 

Could it be Foveros? While the 4 squares are similar, other images had different packaging so I'm not convinced that is the case. This looks more like traditional 4 dies on a substrate, and not any fancy stacking.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, MSI Ventus 3x OC RTX 5070 Ti, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Alienware AW3225QF (32" 240 Hz OLED)
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 4070 FE, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, iiyama ProLite XU2793QSU-B6 (27" 1440p 100 Hz)
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1130250-intel-going-chiplet/#findComment-13095524
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the pads on the bottom, I count 1156. LGA1156... is ancient? In a quick comparison it looks to match placement of features to the old one, apart from the mystery CPU not having capacitors and stuff on the bottom. 1150/1151/1155 looks different. I vaguely recall Intel had "glued" dies together in the distant past, but I'm not aware of it on 1156. Anyone know different?

 

Ok, there's more comments in the tweet thread now. Apparently this was an old experimental CPU with 8 cores in it. Nothing new :( 

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, MSI Ventus 3x OC RTX 5070 Ti, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Alienware AW3225QF (32" 240 Hz OLED)
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 4070 FE, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, iiyama ProLite XU2793QSU-B6 (27" 1440p 100 Hz)
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1130250-intel-going-chiplet/#findComment-13095665
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dissitesuxba11s said:

If this is real, then we can only have thank AMD for pushing them forward.

What AMD is doing isn't anything new. "Chiplet" just appears to be a buzzword for multi-chip module packaging. Intel has done this before with the Pentium D Smithfield and Core 2 Quad. The only thing I'm seeing AMD doing differently here is de-intregrating the chipset features of the CPU and putting it back on its own die, then including that with the processor package.

 

Monolithic design still has its perks, so if the engineers think they can make it work while mitigating the issues that come with it, then it's a design that works for them. Heck, AMD's design with Zen 2 has potential logistical headaches over Zen 1 because they now have to worry about stocking two things rather than one.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1130250-intel-going-chiplet/#findComment-13095669
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×