Brand New RTX 2080 Super getting really low frame. Help

[ImServs]

2 hours ago, 191x7 said:

The 3DMark scores are in the range of the normal scores for the 2080S, so your overall performance shouldn't be suffering.

Maybe those games are supposed to run like that? Can you try the 2080S in a different PC to compare performance?

Sadly i dont have another pc i can compare to. Its weird that my 2080 super and my friends 2080 super's fps is around 500fps different though isnt it? Plus my fps hasnt changed at all from the 2070. Maybe my CPU clock speed really is a bottleneck? Im assuming so cause turning down settings in games does ZERO to help the fps.  

 

Is it possible for the i9-9940X to be affecting FPS that much? I can OC it and see.

 

[191x7]

7 hours ago, servs said:

Sadly i dont have another pc i can compare to. Its weird that my 2080 super and my friends 2080 super's fps is around 500fps different though isnt it? Plus my fps hasnt changed at all from the 2070. Maybe my CPU clock speed really is a bottleneck? Im assuming so cause turning down settings in games does ZERO to help the fps.  

 

Is it possible for the i9-9940X to be affecting FPS that much? I can OC it and see.

 

The thing is, you'r resolution is between 1440p and 4K, with that GPU the CPU shouldn't make that huge of an impact (unless it's a single-core performance based application).

3840x2160=8294400 pixels 4,00x1080p

3440x1440=4953600 pixels 2,39x1080p

2560x1440=3686400 pixels 1,78x1080p

1920x1080=2073600 pixels 1,00x1080p

 

What CPU does your friend have, an i9 9900K? Ryzen 9? You can't compare that to yours, those are a few generations newer and have a higher IPC.

[Kilrah]

15 minutes ago, 191x7 said:

unless it's a single-core performance based application

The CPU usage number he gave for Minecraft matches one single core fully used pretty well, so it seems it's his case.

Still, that CPU seems to be within 10% of so of a 9900K, so it shoudln't be a problem unless some configuration is wrong and it isn't boosting.

[Need_Not]

On 11/27/2019 at 11:37 PM, servs said:

Im not 100% sure its the GPU. Thats just where im starting. I just bought it today and moved up from an RTX 2070, that was getting the exact same frames. No shaders, though i do use them, but my frames are awful in Minecraft and CoD MW (Only 2 games i really play). Im getting around 380FPS in Minecraft and 80FPS in CoD. To compare, my friend who also uses a 2080 Super is getting 1000FPS in Minecraft and 144FPS in CoD (CoD is capped). Ive used AIDA64 to check mobo temps, they are fine, the cpu is a i9-9940X not OC and the usage/temps is normal. I dont see anything that could be bottlenecking and im not sure where to go from here. I feel like its not the card as the RTX 2070 should of had better frames as well. I am using a 120Hz Acer Predator ultrawide 3440x1440 (setting resolution to 1080P changed nothing)

 

Thoughts?

Yeah I get 300-550 on SMP/single player but 700-1000 on mini games because they are blocks in the void

But I have a 2080 not a super so you should have more also if you go in a dark hole and look straight down while using optifine on low settings and zooming in that's how you milk the most fps lol 1700

But I mean that might be normal idk

[Envit0]

15 hours ago, servs said:

Sadly i dont have another pc i can compare to. Its weird that my 2080 super and my friends 2080 super's fps is around 500fps different though isnt it? Plus my fps hasnt changed at all from the 2070. Maybe my CPU clock speed really is a bottleneck? Im assuming so cause turning down settings in games does ZERO to help the fps.  

 

Is it possible for the i9-9940X to be affecting FPS that much? I can OC it and see.

 

Post your CoD settings please. With highest settings and rtx even a 2080ti will not be pushing 144fps at that resolution in most scenes, so your 80 sounds perfectly normal. Benchmark results are also normal. Sorry, but without some info there is nothing people can help with. And no, very doubtfully it will be mobo..

 

[ImServs]

I was able to get my FPS in CoD to stay at 120FPS consistently. After OC the CPU i was able to hit 4.8GHz on single core, and the FPS did actually go up from 50-70 to a mostly stable 120. Also to clarify, because sorry I didnt know it mattered, but my friend uses a i9-9900KS. As for the resolution, my main monitor is currently my editing monitor and im buying a 2nd desk in a few days to move editing over to a second area in my room and getting a 1080p 144Hz 27' monitor to use for gaming, which hopefully gets the frames up higher. I still dont understand how my friend, using the same GPU, is getting significantly higher frames in Minecraft as our single core CPU are almost the same, but hey. My frames are up, and im happy. I never realized how big of an impact CPU clock speed could have on FPS. Thanks to everyone for your help! I feel much more informed now