Jump to content

1660 Ti vs 1660 Super For NVENC Streaming

Hello Linus Tech Tips Forum! My names Juke. But You'll know me as BubbaJ! I'm a bit of a nerd. Always talk nerd talk. But I need to get to the bottom of this and figured I might as well join the Linus fam here other then just on YouTube. 

 

So here's my question/dilemma. For pure live streaming. Which GPU would work better? The 1660Ti or the 1660 Super? I can get the Ti for the same price as the super. So price isn't the issue for me. I'm just wondering which would work out better as a dedicated NVENC Encoder for live streaming. That would be it's only use. Right now I'm leaning towards the TI because I've heard it's the overall better card when it comes to gaming. But I don't need this card for gaming purpose. 

 

Would the encoding be the same on each card so the final answer would just be get whichever is cheaper? Or does it make more sense to get one over the other?  Thank you all for your advice in advanced! 

 

Juke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The encoder should be the same on both cards, so it won't matter which card you get. Its also the exact same on the 1660 if you want to save a few bucks.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a feeling the encoder was the same on both. What I was wondering as well is if the memory speed difference and what not would matter for something like this. I'm assuming it doesn't but I'm not very good on GPU knowledge. 

 

Will the quality be the same for these cards as well as the higher tier cards? As long as it has the Turning Architecture. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlike Pascal/Volta which has varying numbers of NVENC engine in different GPUs (1060 has 1, 1080 has 2, Titan V has 3, each of them is the same), Turing has the same NVENC engine from 1660 to Titan RTX. 1650 uses Pascal and Volta's NVENC engine instead.

 

4 minutes ago, B U B B A J said:

Will the quality be the same for these cards as well as the higher tier cards? As long as it has the Turning Architecture. 

If you consider the fact that you cannot run graphical settings nearly as high as the higher tier cards, then yes the 1660S and 1660Ti are worse. In just encoding performance, they are all the same except the 1650.

 

5 minutes ago, B U B B A J said:

What I was wondering as well is if the memory speed difference and what not would matter for something like this. I'm assuming it doesn't but I'm not very good on GPU knowledge. 

It's a separate component

 

tho I would say that manually overclocking 1660's GDDR5 is already enough, no need to buy 1660S just for the GDDR6

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

All this now I'm seeing they are releasing a 1650 in a few days. Givin this will be the same quality encoding I'm wonder what the price should be and just wait for that. I had no idea a new card with that encoding chip was coming on the 22nd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why Nvidia needs to stop making so many sku's, it's like they're 5 year olds "oh no we have competition lets release super models because our original version is a disappointment" smh amd only 550-590 last gen which is 4 which is normal, and they have that for polaris architecture, 5700, 5700 xt. and later 5500 and 5500 xt. 4 sku's for a gen. MEANWHILE NVidia has what like 2060,2070,2080, and all of those with super variants + a last gen with turing?? wtf, anyways 2080 ti and titan rtx that is  a total of 8-9 SKU's for a single architecture. /rant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I feel ya lol. I was never planning on getting a new GPU until I saw the difference in streaming quality with their new cards. Seeing as to how cheap you can get them I figured it was for sure a smart buy vs trying to upgrade my entire rig. That's why I'm aiming for the cheapest card with the chip. I'm hoping the 1650 Super is decently cheap. Then getting that card will be pretty much be the obvious choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, redbread123 said:

This is why Nvidia needs to stop making so many sku's, it's like they're 5 year olds "oh no we have competition lets release super models because our original version is a disappointment" smh amd only 550-590 last gen which is 4 which is normal, and they have that for polaris architecture, 5700, 5700 xt. and later 5500 and 5500 xt. 4 sku's for a gen. MEANWHILE NVidia has what like 2060,2070,2080, and all of those with super variants + a last gen with turing?? wtf, anyways 2080 ti and titan rtx that is  a total of 8-9 SKU's for a single architecture. /rant

There were more than 4:

1799874193_ScreenShot2019-11-15at2_21_29PM.png.e0dd7098206696a28715e1f34a8dba34.png

 

7 of them, Polaris also didn't have a high end. High end was Vega 56, 64, and LE (a 64 with pro driver options and twice the VRAM). Whereas Pascal was 1030 - 1050 - 1050 Ti - 1060 3GB - 1060 6GB - 1070 - 1070 Ti - 1080 - 1080 Ti by the time it was discontinued. 9 GPUs vs the 10 AMD had at the time (RX 500 and RX Vega series). 

Now Turing is out, so far 1650 - 1650 Super - 1660 - 1660 Super - 1660 Ti - 2060 - 2060 Super - 2070 - 2070 Super - 2080 - 2080 Super - 2080 Ti. 12 cards, only a 3 card increase from Pascal. 

 

AMD's current offerings are the 5700, 5700 XT, and on the high end the Radeon VII (came out at the same time as Turing, is still AMD's flagship, kinda sorta discontinued but also not). Then they have the 5500 and 5500 XT you mentioned as well, which will bring the total to 5 cards so far ( RX 5000 and Vega 7nm/Vega II series). A lot less than Nvidia, but they're also still selling the whole RX 500 series as well AFAIK. I assume they've stopped making the RX Vega line, but they may not have? 

Point being neither manufacturer is innocent, both have massively convoluted product lines for various reasons. 

Intel HEDT and Server platform enthusiasts: Intel HEDT Xeon/i7 Megathread 

 

Main PC 

CPU: i9 7980XE @4.5GHz/1.22v/-2 AVX offset 

Cooler: EKWB Supremacy Block - custom loop w/360mm +280mm rads 

Motherboard: EVGA X299 Dark 

RAM:4x8GB HyperX Predator DDR4 @3200Mhz CL16 

GPU: Nvidia FE 2060 Super/Corsair HydroX 2070 FE block 

Storage:  1TB MP34 + 1TB 970 Evo + 500GB Atom30 + 250GB 960 Evo 

Optical Drives: LG WH14NS40 

PSU: EVGA 1600W T2 

Case & Fans: Corsair 750D Airflow - 3x Noctua iPPC NF-F12 + 4x Noctua iPPC NF-A14 PWM 

OS: Windows 11

 

Display: LG 27UK650-W (4K 60Hz IPS panel)

Mouse: EVGA X17

Keyboard: Corsair K55 RGB

 

Mobile/Work Devices: 2020 M1 MacBook Air (work computer) - iPhone 13 Pro Max - Apple Watch S3

 

Other Misc Devices: iPod Video (Gen 5.5E, 128GB SD card swap, running Rockbox), Nintendo Switch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zando Bob said:

There were more than 4:

1799874193_ScreenShot2019-11-15at2_21_29PM.png.e0dd7098206696a28715e1f34a8dba34.png

 

7 of them, Polaris also didn't have a high end. High end was Vega 56, 64, and LE (a 64 with pro driver options and twice the VRAM). Whereas Pascal was 1030 - 1050 - 1050 Ti - 1060 3GB - 1060 6GB - 1070 - 1070 Ti - 1080 - 1080 Ti by the time it was discontinued. 9 GPUs vs the 10 AMD had at the time (RX 500 and RX Vega series). 

Now Turing is out, so far 1650 - 1650 Super - 1660 - 1660 Super - 1660 Ti - 2060 - 2060 Super - 2070 - 2070 Super - 2080 - 2080 Super - 2080 Ti. 12 cards, only a 3 card increase from Pascal. 

 

AMD's current offerings are the 5700, 5700 XT, and on the high end the Radeon VII (came out at the same time as Turing, is still AMD's flagship, kinda sorta discontinued but also not). Then they have the 5500 and 5500 XT you mentioned as well, which will bring the total to 5 cards so far ( RX 5000 and Vega 7nm/Vega II series). A lot less than Nvidia, but they're also still selling the whole RX 500 series as well AFAIK. I assume they've stopped making the RX Vega line, but they may not have? 

Point being neither manufacturer is innocent, both have massively convoluted product lines for various reasons. 

oh I got infected by the amd fanboys sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, redbread123 said:

oh I got infected by the amd fanboys sorry

Is aight, lol. These forums are incredibly pro-AMD, often ignoring or discounting any advantages other OEMs (currently Intel for CPUs and Nvidia for GPUs, Intel isn't in the GPU game yet and probably won't hardcore compete for a while) have because they cost a bit more. Mebbe it's not so much pro-AMD, but pro-absolute most performance possible for the least amount of money when in reality, people will often just pay a bit more for a better experience. 

Intel HEDT and Server platform enthusiasts: Intel HEDT Xeon/i7 Megathread 

 

Main PC 

CPU: i9 7980XE @4.5GHz/1.22v/-2 AVX offset 

Cooler: EKWB Supremacy Block - custom loop w/360mm +280mm rads 

Motherboard: EVGA X299 Dark 

RAM:4x8GB HyperX Predator DDR4 @3200Mhz CL16 

GPU: Nvidia FE 2060 Super/Corsair HydroX 2070 FE block 

Storage:  1TB MP34 + 1TB 970 Evo + 500GB Atom30 + 250GB 960 Evo 

Optical Drives: LG WH14NS40 

PSU: EVGA 1600W T2 

Case & Fans: Corsair 750D Airflow - 3x Noctua iPPC NF-F12 + 4x Noctua iPPC NF-A14 PWM 

OS: Windows 11

 

Display: LG 27UK650-W (4K 60Hz IPS panel)

Mouse: EVGA X17

Keyboard: Corsair K55 RGB

 

Mobile/Work Devices: 2020 M1 MacBook Air (work computer) - iPhone 13 Pro Max - Apple Watch S3

 

Other Misc Devices: iPod Video (Gen 5.5E, 128GB SD card swap, running Rockbox), Nintendo Switch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, B U B B A J said:

For pure live streaming. Which GPU would work better?

If you're using OBS, you can put the AMD Navi cards in the running. Their hardware encoder is now on-par with NVENC, if the software supports it properly. OBS has a pre-release update that enable full proper support for it. Releases · obsproject/obs-amd-encoder · GitHub

CPURyzen 7 5800X Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 120mm AIO with push-pull Arctic P12 PWM fans RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws V 4x8GB 3600 16-16-16-30

MotherboardASRock X570M Pro4 GPUASRock RX 5700 XT Reference with Eiswolf GPX-Pro 240 AIO Case: Antec P5 PSU: Rosewill Capstone 750M

Monitor: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC Case Fans: 2x Arctic P12 PWM Storage: HP EX950 1TB NVMe, Mushkin Pilot-E 1TB NVMe, 2x Constellation ES 2TB in RAID1

https://hwbot.org/submission/4497882_btgbullseye_gpupi_v3.3___32b_radeon_rx_5700_xt_13min_37sec_848ms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Zando Bob said:

There were more than 4:

1799874193_ScreenShot2019-11-15at2_21_29PM.png.e0dd7098206696a28715e1f34a8dba34.png

 

7 of them, Polaris also didn't have a high end. High end was Vega 56, 64, and LE (a 64 with pro driver options and twice the VRAM). Whereas Pascal was 1030 - 1050 - 1050 Ti - 1060 3GB - 1060 6GB - 1070 - 1070 Ti - 1080 - 1080 Ti by the time it was discontinued. 9 GPUs vs the 10 AMD had at the time (RX 500 and RX Vega series). 
 

If only it were that simle. This is the list of Pascal based cards:
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?generation=GeForce+10&sort=generation

And if I remember right, there was also RX 580 2048SP, basically rebranded RX 570

Ex-EX build: Liquidfy C+... R.I.P.

Ex-build:

Meshify C – sold

Ryzen 5 1600x @4.0 GHz/1.4V – sold

Gigabyte X370 Aorus Gaming K7 – sold

Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8 GB @3200 Mhz – sold

Alpenfoehn Brocken 3 Black Edition – it's somewhere

Sapphire Vega 56 Pulse – ded

Intel SSD 660p 1TB – sold

be Quiet! Straight Power 11 750w – sold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×