Jump to content

would ryzen 7 2700x bottleneck rtx 2070

5 hours ago, Streetguru said:

Storage: Intel 660p Series 512 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive  ($62.99 @ B&H)

More expensive and slower than many of the TLC drives available on Newegg.

https://www.newegg.com/hp-ex900-500gb/p/N82E16820326251?Item=N82E16820326251 HP EX900 $56

https://www.newegg.com/patriot-scorch-512gb/p/N82E16820225110?Item=N82E16820225110 Patriot SCORCH $58

https://www.newegg.com/mushkin-enhanced-helix-l-500gb/p/N82E16820226898?Item=N82E16820226898 Mushkin Enhanced Helix-L $58 (my personal recommendation)

https://www.newegg.com/silicon-power-p34a80-512gb/p/N82E16820301394?Item=N82E16820301394 Silicon Power's generic 512GB NVMe $63 (the fastest one for the same price or less)

 

The 660p is early-adopter grade stuff, it's not worth it. The whole point of QLC is that it will eventually be less expensive by a large amount, but right now it isn't, and that makes it a bad investment.

CPURyzen 7 5800X Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 120mm AIO with push-pull Arctic P12 PWM fans RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws V 4x8GB 3600 16-16-16-30

MotherboardASRock X570M Pro4 GPUASRock RX 5700 XT Reference with Eiswolf GPX-Pro 240 AIO Case: Antec P5 PSU: Rosewill Capstone 750M

Monitor: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC Case Fans: 2x Arctic P12 PWM Storage: HP EX950 1TB NVMe, Mushkin Pilot-E 1TB NVMe, 2x Constellation ES 2TB in RAID1

https://hwbot.org/submission/4497882_btgbullseye_gpupi_v3.3___32b_radeon_rx_5700_xt_13min_37sec_848ms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BTGbullseye said:

More expensive and slower than many of the TLC drives available on Newegg.

The HP/Mushkin ones don't have a DRAM cache

Not enough info on the Silicon Power One


The Scorch seems comparable to the 660p in any event.

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Streetguru said:

The HP/Mushkin ones don't have a DRAM cache

Which only minimally affect the speed of the drive, and is primarily a longevity increaser. (and since TLC is already a longer lifespan, it's not a significant detriment to it) I can confirm from personal experience that the EX900 meets its performance specifications when empty, and only drops by about 10-15% when it's 90% full. (abnormally low performance drop) I can also confirm from experience that the Mushkin meets its performance specs when empty or with just Windows installed.

2 hours ago, Streetguru said:

Not enough info on the Silicon Power One

What info do you feel it's lacking? It is an ultra-generic drive in the first place, so pretty much the same features as the rest of them are to be expected.

2 hours ago, Streetguru said:

The Scorch seems comparable to the 660p in any event.

At a lower price, and with a longer expected lifespan. It's also the slowest of the bunch, but still faster than the 660p.

CPURyzen 7 5800X Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 120mm AIO with push-pull Arctic P12 PWM fans RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws V 4x8GB 3600 16-16-16-30

MotherboardASRock X570M Pro4 GPUASRock RX 5700 XT Reference with Eiswolf GPX-Pro 240 AIO Case: Antec P5 PSU: Rosewill Capstone 750M

Monitor: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC Case Fans: 2x Arctic P12 PWM Storage: HP EX950 1TB NVMe, Mushkin Pilot-E 1TB NVMe, 2x Constellation ES 2TB in RAID1

https://hwbot.org/submission/4497882_btgbullseye_gpupi_v3.3___32b_radeon_rx_5700_xt_13min_37sec_848ms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×