Jump to content

Gaming PC, Please Help.

Go to solution Solved by jerubedo,
Just now, Meebles said:

OK, I decided to go for the 9600K. The $10 is worth the peace of mind I guess. I think I'll stick with my cooler choice, though. I just don't trust liquid.I wouldn't upgrade the cpu. By the time I'm ready for a new one I'd get whatever the latest and greatest is with a new motherboard. I don't usually upgrade anything for several years. Usually 3-5 I guess.

 

Final build?

 

Looks good to me! :) 

Hey friends. I’m wanting to build a new PC around $1200 - $1400 (USA). $1400 is the absolute max. I’d prefer it to be lower if possible but if a build comes close to that limit and it performs better I’d probably go for it. I just got a ViewSonic 144Hz 1080p monitor. I want to aim for 144 FPS if that fits in my budget. I was thinking about a 2600 and a 2080 since I’ve hear good things, but I’m open for other parts too. Everything else I have no clue.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can wait for July to see new Ryzen chips, do so. They might be as good as Intel chips in gaming, we'll see. If not, this build should fit your needs well:

 

The 9600K will beat out the 2600 by a decent margin in almost every game for 144Hz gaming as seen here:

 

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i5-9600k-coffee-lake-cpu,5922.html

and

https://www.bit-tech.net/reviews/intel-core-i5-9600k-review/5/

Just as two examples.

 

The 2080 is indeed a good choice. In order to keep the build a little cheaper I just have a 500GB SSD there. You can bump it up to 1TB and still be in budget, or add a 1TB or 2TB HDD, again still within budget.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626357
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

This build should fit your needs well:

 

The 9600K will beat out the 2600 by a decent margin in almost every game for 144Hz gaming as seen here:

 

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i5-9600k-coffee-lake-cpu,5922.html

and

https://www.bit-tech.net/reviews/intel-core-i5-9600k-review/5/

Just as two examples.

 

The 2080 is indeed a good choice. In order to keep the build a little cheaper I just have a 500GB SSD there. You can bump it up to 1GB and still be in budget, or add a 1TB or 2TB HDD, again still within budget.

Wow that was a way faster response than I thought I'd get. I love this forum! Anywho are you sure those 2 sites are right? I've been hearing that Ryzen chips are better for gaming. That first link has the 9600K beating even the 2700x. That doesn't sound right to me. I like everything else. If it is right then I'd highly consider this.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626361
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Meebles said:

Wow that was a way faster response than I thought I'd get. I love this forum! Anywho are you sure those 2 sites are right? I've been hearing that Ryzen chips are better for gaming. That first link has the 9600K beating even the 2700x. That doesn't sound right to me. I like everything else. If it is right then I'd highly consider this.

Yep, I'm sure. Those are two big review sites that are reputable. There are also results that are the same from AnandTech, and Tech Powerup. The reason Intel wins in gaming loads, right now, is because of better IPC, better clocks, and better lower latency. Ryzen 3000 in July might change that, but we don't know yet.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626364
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

Yep, I'm sure. Those are two big review sites that are reputable. There are also results that are the same from AnandTech, and Tech Powerup. The reason Intel wins in gaming loads, right now, is because of better IPC, better clocks, and better lower latency. Ryzen 3000 in July might change that, but we don't know yet.

Thanks! and that cooler is ok? Never heard of the brand. Same with the RAM. Are these reliable?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626367
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Meebles said:

Thanks! and that cooler is ok? Never heard of the brand. Same with the RAM. Are these reliable?

Yep! Both are good. The esports cooler performs very similarly to the Noctua D15 (which is one of the best air coolers on the market) for a fraction of the price. For the RAM, all RAM is made at pretty much the same few factories across the globe. The name you see as the "brand" is really just who assembles it and who answers the phone. That's the only thing I couldn't guarantee: how good their phone support is. I have no experience in that department.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626369
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't have to buy right now, i would wait for 7th of July. Then the new Ryzen processors will launch and if you believe the rumors, they will be very good.
The new chips are about as fast as intel chips when it comes to single core performance but bring more cores for less money

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626427
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The i5-9600K is only US$10 more than the i5-9600KF. I think it is worth that little bit more to have an iGPU. It's useful as a backup gpu. It also has Quick Sync which can be beneficial for video editing, transcoding, streaming, etc.

 

 

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626454
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Daniel Z. said:

How does the 8700 perform compared to the 9600? VII compared to 2080?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626461
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Daniel Z. said:

why would you buy a non overclockable chip from intel?
Intel is great at cpu clock, by taking a locked cpu you take away that advantage

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626463
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Meebles said:

How does the 8700 perform compared to the 9600? VII compared to 2080?

The 9600K beats the 8700 in most gaming loads because of the higher clocks, especially if you get it up to 5.0GHz. The 8700 does have more threads, but on 6 cores that largely doesn't affect overall gaming performance right now. It COULD in the future, but when that point will come, no one knows. For Vega VII vs the 2080, they trade blows, but the 2080 gives access to Ray Tracing hardware and it draws less power.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626468
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Meebles said:

How does the 8700 perform compared to the 9600? VII compared to 2080?

the 9600k is a little faster in single core work loads than the 8700 non k.
The Radeon VII is about 4% slower over all than the RTX 2080

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626469
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Meebles said:

How does the 8700 perform compared to the 9600? VII compared to 2080?

also the i7 8700 doesn't have a soldered hs, but uses thermal paste as far as i know.
The i5 9600k is soldered, which results in better temps and a quieter system

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626473
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Devryd said:

why would you buy a non overclockable chip from intel?
Intel is great at cpu clock, by taking a locked cpu you take away that advantage

 

No, the 8700 trades blows with the 9600K. 

 

20 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

The 9600K beats the 8700 in most gaming loads because of the higher clocks, especially if you get it up to 5.0GHz. The 8700 does have more threads, but on 6 cores that largely doesn't affect overall gaming performance right now. It COULD in the future, but when that point will come, no one knows. For Vega VII vs the 2080, they trade blows, but the 2080 gives access to Ray Tracing hardware and it draws less power.

Usually only by 2-5 FPS, but having more threads helps in the future as we have seen with older i5 and i7s. Radeon VII has much better compute performance and Radeon cards generally age better than Nvidia cards. 

 

18 minutes ago, Devryd said:

also the i7 8700 doesn't have a soldered hs, but uses thermal paste as far as i know.
The i5 9600k is soldered, which results in better temps and a quieter system

Not true. The 8700 would have better temps because it rated for a lower TDP, 65w vs 95w. The solder vs paste isn’t big enough a differences to offset this. 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626493
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Daniel Z. said:

Usually only by 2-5 FPS, but having more threads helps in the future as we have seen with older i5 and i7s. Radeon VII has much better compute performance and Radeon cards generally age better than Nvidia cards. 

Your argument on both fronts is that the parts might  perform better later. I don't know about the OP, but I want my performance now, not later. And in some titles it's more than 2-5 FPS. I'd say that on average it's probably around there, but in titles where clocks matter more, you can expect a little more, but even so 5 FPS more is still 5 FPS more. Plus the 8700 costs 25% more than the 9600K. Better performance right now for a better price right now = better in my book.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626626
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Devryd said:

why would you buy a non overclockable chip from intel?
Intel is great at cpu clock, by taking a locked cpu you take away that advantage

 

When one buys a locked cpu one gets a known performance envelope. The fact that the performance is predictable with certainty is not a negative. These cpu have significantly lower TDP leading to quieter and typically less expensive cooling solutions. They can also be used with less expensive motherboards.

 

The average performance improvement realized by overclocking is offset by the increased total system cost. Fine if one wants the highest possible performance. For those with a more limited budget a locked cpu can make more sense.

 

6 hours ago, jerubedo said:

Also locking the RAM speed to 2666MHz by using a B365 board.

 

While some games have shown an improvement with higher speed memory the difference is generally less than 10%. For the budget conscious, not worth the added cost.

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626976
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, brob said:

While some games have shown an improvement with higher speed memory the difference is generally less than 10%. For the budget conscious, not worth the added cost.

If OP were trying a sub-$1000 Intel build I would agree.

But I mean OP's budget of $1400 isn't exactly small, there is definitely room in there for a better Z-series motherboard and support for higher speed memory.

 

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600  Heatsink: ID-Cooling Frostflow X GPU: Zotac GTX 1060 Mini 6GB RAM: KLEVV Bolt 3600Mhz (2x8GB) Mobo: ASUS B550-F ROG Strix (Wifi)  Case: Fractal Design Meshify C PSU: Deepcool DQ-M-V2L

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12626989
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12627111
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jerubedo said:

Your argument on both fronts is that the parts might  perform better later. I don't know about the OP, but I want my performance now, not later. And in some titles it's more than 2-5 FPS. I'd say that on average it's probably around there, but in titles where clocks matter more, you can expect a little more, but even so 5 FPS more is still 5 FPS more. Plus the 8700 costs 25% more than the 9600K. Better performance right now for a better price right now = better in my book.

I agree with this line of thinking so I'd say this is on the right track for what I'm wanting.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12627685
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jerubedo said:

Yep! Both are good. The esports cooler performs very similarly to the Noctua D15 (which is one of the best air coolers on the market) for a fraction of the price. For the RAM, all RAM is made at pretty much the same few factories across the globe. The name you see as the "brand" is really just who assembles it and who answers the phone. That's the only thing I couldn't guarantee: how good their phone support is. I have no experience in that department.

What about this build?

 

I changed the ram to G. Skill for peace of mind since I've dealt with their customer support before. I also changed the cooler to the Hyper 212 from Cooler Master. It's a brand I trust. The site flagged the tower as incompatible with the 212, though, so I had to change the tower to the 270R. Is all of this okay? It even came out a bit cheaper at $1300 even.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12627696
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Meebles said:

What about this build?

 

I changed the ram to G. Skill for peace of mind since I've dealt with their customer support before. I also changed the cooler to the Hyper 212 from Cooler Master. It's a brand I trust. The site flagged the tower as incompatible with the 212, though, so I had to change the tower to the 270R. Is all of this okay? It even came out a bit cheaper at $1300 even.

Yep, this would work without any issues. The RAM is good, the cooler is sufficient, and the 270R still has decent airflow.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12627711
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Meebles said:

What about this build?

 

I changed the ram to G. Skill for peace of mind since I've dealt with their customer support before. I also changed the cooler to the Hyper 212 from Cooler Master. It's a brand I trust. The site flagged the tower as incompatible with the 212, though, so I had to change the tower to the 270R. Is all of this okay? It even came out a bit cheaper at $1300 even.

Get the 9600k, it’s the same price so just get it with iGPU. It’s great for troubleshooting and Quick Sync. RAM is fine. If you want Cooler Master, go with the ML240L, 212 is not good for a 9600k

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1070560-gaming-pc-please-help/#findComment-12627734
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×