Jump to content

Rx 570 on ryzen 3 1300x causes bottleneck ?

I recently bought a Sapphire Pulse RX 570 4GB and paired it with a Ryzen 3 1300 stock on an A320 board. Performance of CSGO and Fortnite in low settings are not that good. Anyone using the same setup like me ? Is the Ryzen 3 bottlenecking my GPU ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean by 'not that great'?

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean i used to have a rx580 4gb and a ryzen 5 1400 and it ran great on everything high except shadows and motion blur off around 120 frames a sec average. I dont know how far in power a 570 and a 580 is but i wouldn't expect a lot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

fortnite and csgo are cpu bound games, the 570 can in theory push medium at 100fps+ paired with a powerful cpu on those games

CPU: Intel core i7-8086K Case: CORSAIR Crystal 570X RGB CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H150i PRO RGB Storage: Samsung 980 Pro - 2TB NVMe SSD PSU: EVGA 1000 GQ, 80+ GOLD 1000W, Semi Modular GPU: MSI Radeon RX 580 GAMING X 8G RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200mhz Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Navid Jamali said:

fortnite and csgo are cpu bound games, the 570 can in theory push medium at 100fps+ paired with a powerful cpu on those games

I would like to state that on my i3-8100 + 1050 ti build, I got 60+ fps on mixed settings

 

CPU: Intel core i7-8086K Case: CORSAIR Crystal 570X RGB CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H150i PRO RGB Storage: Samsung 980 Pro - 2TB NVMe SSD PSU: EVGA 1000 GQ, 80+ GOLD 1000W, Semi Modular GPU: MSI Radeon RX 580 GAMING X 8G RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200mhz Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

By "not that good" I meant fps drops. I am a competitive CS:GO player. That means I use 4:3 resolutions like 1024x768 / 1280x960. At low settings I should get over 250+ fps in any given map. But I get like 140-230 fps.
In fortnite I get huge stutters frequently, just because the fps is dropping from 170 to 90 fps. FPS remains the same even after lowering the resolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, sonic99 said:

By not that great. I am a competitive CS:GO player. That means I use 4:3 resolutions like 1024x768 / 1280x960. At low settings I should get over 250+ fps in any given map. But I get like 140-230 fps.
In fortnite I get huge stutters frequently, just because the fps is dropping from 170 to 90 fps. FPS remains the same even after lowering the resolution.

neither of those components are meant to do that in those games

maybe a ryzen 5 + 580 would be a closer solution

CPU: Intel core i7-8086K Case: CORSAIR Crystal 570X RGB CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H150i PRO RGB Storage: Samsung 980 Pro - 2TB NVMe SSD PSU: EVGA 1000 GQ, 80+ GOLD 1000W, Semi Modular GPU: MSI Radeon RX 580 GAMING X 8G RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200mhz Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Navid Jamali said:

neither of those components are meant to do that in those games

maybe a ryzen 5 + 580 would be a closer solution

I bet it can. I have played with a r7 370 and i3 6100 back in the days. I used to get 200+ fps on everything low @1024x768 resolution. There has been several map updates for which I might get a 10% drop in FPS but not by that margin. Ryzen 3 1300x and RX 570 is surely much better right ?
Can a faulty CPU or motherboard can cause these type of issues? Or its just with these type of CPU bound games ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Navid Jamali said:

 the 570 can in theory push medium at 100fps+ paired with a powerful cpu on those games

100fps+ in csgo medium? 1030 + g4560s can do that.

150-200fps max is RX 570 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

cpu bound is either one of 2 things, either the game likes more cpu cores to do multi threaded workloads, which neither of these games immensely benefit from, or single core performance which the 6100 and the ryzen 3 both have the same amount of.  So assuming that there has been 0 changes to the game and operating system and background tasks, you should be seeing around a 10% frame rate increase which the 570 is capable of.

 

though seeing that you're on a budget build, are you by chance using a monitor that can't display 240hz? Because having the monitor unable to have a higher fps would mean that the game would have no gain at those framerates.

CPU: Intel core i7-8086K Case: CORSAIR Crystal 570X RGB CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H150i PRO RGB Storage: Samsung 980 Pro - 2TB NVMe SSD PSU: EVGA 1000 GQ, 80+ GOLD 1000W, Semi Modular GPU: MSI Radeon RX 580 GAMING X 8G RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200mhz Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Navid Jamali said:

cpu bound is either one of 2 things, either the game likes more cpu cores to do multi threaded workloads, which neither of these games immensely benefit from, or single core performance which the 6100 and the ryzen 3 both have the same amount of.  So assuming that there has been 0 changes to the game and operating system and background tasks, you should be seeing around a 10% frame rate increase which the 570 is capable of.

 

though seeing that you're on a budget build, are you by chance using a monitor that can't display 240hz? Because having the monitor unable to have a higher fps would mean that the game would have no gain at those framerates.

Already stated that I am a competitive CSGO player. Getting those extra frames does help us no matter what's the Hz. I do run a 60h monitor.
Btw, do you think A320 board lowers down performance of CPU by any means ? I dont care about OC performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, sonic99 said:

Already stated that I am a competitive CSGO player. Getting those extra frames does help us no matter what's the Hz. I do run a 60h monitor.
Btw, do you think A320 board lowers down performance of CPU by any means ? I dont care about OC performance.

unless you got the absolutely cheapest and most nerfed down motherboard, then no

as for my testing though, there are 0 gains for having a higher refresh rate than what the monitor, and those who claim there are are just repeating an incorrect rumor.

CPU: Intel core i7-8086K Case: CORSAIR Crystal 570X RGB CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H150i PRO RGB Storage: Samsung 980 Pro - 2TB NVMe SSD PSU: EVGA 1000 GQ, 80+ GOLD 1000W, Semi Modular GPU: MSI Radeon RX 580 GAMING X 8G RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200mhz Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

CPU: Intel core i7-8086K Case: CORSAIR Crystal 570X RGB CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H150i PRO RGB Storage: Samsung 980 Pro - 2TB NVMe SSD PSU: EVGA 1000 GQ, 80+ GOLD 1000W, Semi Modular GPU: MSI Radeon RX 580 GAMING X 8G RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200mhz Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Navid Jamali said:

unless you got the absolutely cheapest and most nerfed down motherboard, then no

as for my testing though, there are 0 gains for having a higher refresh rate than what the monitor, and those who claim there are are just repeating an incorrect rumor.

Is there any way to verify whether my motherboard is fine by software methods ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, sonic99 said:

Is there any way to verify whether my motherboard is fine by software methods ?

yeah, run a benchmark and compare your parts to other peoples parts

CPU: Intel core i7-8086K Case: CORSAIR Crystal 570X RGB CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H150i PRO RGB Storage: Samsung 980 Pro - 2TB NVMe SSD PSU: EVGA 1000 GQ, 80+ GOLD 1000W, Semi Modular GPU: MSI Radeon RX 580 GAMING X 8G RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200mhz Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×