Search the Community

For R20,R15 and R11.5 you can download all of them at once and run them through benchmate https://benchmate.org/ The latest version of cinebench R20 is out! download it here > https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/p/cinebench/9pgzkjc81q7j?activetab=pivot:overviewtab Download R15> http://www.guru3d.com/files_details/cinebench_15_download.html To download any version of cinebench, type cinebench into google! To download cinebench 2003 go to > http://hwbot.org/ < then benchmarks> processor benchmarks> then click download. its a rar file so you will need to open it with 7zip or a similar program. To download cpuz or gpuz, type them into google and get the latest version. FAQ: How do i get my score put on the spreadsheet? You wait a very very very long time How many times can i post my scores? you can post as many scores as you like with as many different cpu's as you like. if you have 2 of the same cpu then let me know. only the highest score you get with a cpu will go on the spreadsheet. (e.g if you have a score with a 2500k@3ghz and then improve your score with your 2500k@4ghz then your score at 3ghz will be deleted and your score at 4ghz will go on the spreadsheet. if you get a with a 2500k@3ghz then upgrade your cpu to a 2600k@ 3ghz you will keep both scores. Why is my gpu being beaten by a much slower gpu on the open gl test? This will probably be because your cpu is slower single thread. the open gl benchmark is designed to be limited as much as possible by your cpu, so if your gpu is getting beaten by much slower gpu's. overclock your cpu more! How do i run the single thread test? In the top left hand corner, click file, then advanced benchmark. this should bring up 'cpu (single core)' underneath the normal cpu test. this test takes much longer as it only uses one core and one thread. Post a screenshot of your score in this thread with cpuz so we know the clock speed (dont crop the screenshot) Memory and motherboard tabs are optional, but are useful if you are looking for tips for higher scores you can take a screenshot by press shift and prt sc on your keyboard. then to see you screenshot open paint (with comes installed with every copy of windows) then you can either press ctrl and v or paste in paint and the screenshot will appear in paint you then save the file as a .jpeg somewhere you will be able to find it later open the interwebs and upload it to your gallery on the forum or upload it to a place of your choice and simply copy and paste the image into a new post on this thread Top tips to a high score: 1) Don't have any other programs running while you are doing the benchmark. This includes temperature monitoring software and cpuz. if you are concerned about your temps do one run with the monitor open to check they dont get too high, then another run without it open. 2) Overclock your cpu and gpu! 3) take your side panel off your case, open a window or go in a colder place. less heat+more overclock=higher scores. 4) Run the tests separately a few times this can get you that last extra point. 5) Run it on a fresh install if you can. fresh installs are always faster. 6) Don't use your 24/7 oc. top scores will be done with overclocks that might be too hot or too unstable for normal use. 7) more ghz on your cpu is always good, but make sure your ram is running at its full potential too. Normally 1600mhz cl8 will be faster than 1866mhz cl10. get that cl down as low as possible while trying to maintain a good memory frequency. link to scores google doc (R20)> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ItbDCn4dPaJANGgFczL3uCZRquxZXQM9Kmn17kCBdZE/edit?usp=sharing link to scores google doc (R15)> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC81MjwelBgdEZNV3l6aHl1eUNwSUR4Rml0MXMzN1E&usp=sharing link to scores google doc (R11.5)> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC81MjwelBgdGpFa3BPaG5QRG1QREFPU3A0dWdVTlE#gid=0 link to scores google doc (2003)> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC81MjwelBgdGVQQnFRVUNxTjZPYVdjT1pDdHA0MUE#gid=0 R15 Extreme Score have now been integrated into the R15 sheet Example Screenshots: How your ram speed can affect your cinebench scores. R11.5 R15 Watch the Pros at MSI MOA 2014! 12/12/14: 250 submissions. Cheddle

I built this PC around a month ago and wanted to do a little testing. Specs: CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 GPU: Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 7900 XTX MOBO: Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX Memory: Gskill Flare X5 32GB (2x16) 6000MT/s CL30-38-38-96 (EXPO Enabled) PSU: MSI MPG A850G PCIE 5 (80+ Gold 850W) Disclaimer: I know very little about benchmarks, or what is or isn't a good score so I could just be an idiot, I'm just trying to make sure that everything is running properly before my return window closes for all my parts. I decided to download and run Cinebench 2024 and Unigine Heaven. I ran Cinebench first for the GPU and I got, what I believe to be a poor score? I don't know if being lower on the list than a 2070 super is bad...but it SOUNDS bad. These were my test results along with a screenshot of my afterburner near the end of the test. I ran everything stock and I haven't touched any settings for my hardware other than enabling EXPO on my memory. After I ran this test, I noticed I had an update for my GPU drivers in Adrenalin, so I downloaded that, restarted, and tried the run the test again, but now every time I try to run the GPU test, Cinebench just closes. I tried a couple times after a couple restarts and it keeps doing the same thing. I don't know if this is a big issue or not, but I didn't keep trying after that. Next I ran a multi core test for my CPU, with the following results. Again, I don't know if this is good or not but I felt it went ok? The stats on Ryzen Master were fairly constant through the whole test. I took a screenshot towards the middle of the test (shown) and again near the end, but the stats were nearly identical so I didn't post the second screenshot. Finally, I ran Unigine Heaven on both high and ultra. In the first Cinebench GPU test, the speed was around 3100MHz, and in the Unigine test they were fairly steady around 2800MHz. TLDR: I basically just want someone smarter than me to tell me if everything here looks ok, and if not, is there something I can do? I haven't really had any issues gaming so far, but I wasn't sure if there were any hidden symptoms here which might effect me down the road. Either way, I appreciate your time. Thank you

As mentioned in the title, R23 keeps giving application error and stops at random point, and R24 gives no errors at all and simply freezes around 30 seconds in. I wasnt stress testing as I already did hours of Aida64 and i just wanted to check some score on R24. It shouldnt be any voltage related issue. I m running a 13900k on Win11. This is the error in question for R23 with the error log As for R24, literally nothing happens and the app just freezes and become completely unresponsive.

I got a ZBook Fury 16 G9 with an i7-12800HX which I've been using daily for the past 2 months. It performs well and I've been quite happy with it. Running Cinebench R23 on it when I first got it 2 months ago, I was happy to see that the CPU would not get hot enough to throttle, staying at a maximum 89C. I would get scores in the 16k range. Recently however it has mysteriously started exceeding that temp and routinely hitting 96-100C, with throttling reducing performance. Now I'm seeing scores in the 14k range. I haven't made any software or hardware changes. The fans pretty much are as clean as they were when I got it. In the mean time, I've had to resort to using ThrottleStop to set lower power limits in order to keep temps down, since the CPU cannot be undervolted. Anyone have any ideas about what might be going on? Any help is appreciated!

Mostly a screenshot dump with analysis later, feel free to contribute anything interesting y'all notice. Before each run, I reset the data on HWinfo64, so the data on each screenshot is only for that run, taken IMMEDIATELY after each run finished. **note that this is all done with the same hardware configuration, I simply reconfigured the core configuration, so this isn't actually a 7700x (CCD1) or 7800x3D (CCD0), but simulated with a 7950x3D (CCD0+CCD1). I believe this to be a fair comparison between Zen4 and Zen4 3D v-cache when comparing cinebench r23 clock speeds, power consumption, temperatures, and scores.** I'm starting with the comparison of the all core runs because I captured these in 4K and have an upload limit of 20MB (they're ~4MB a piece...) Ryzen 7950x3D PBO +200MHz / -15mV curve CPPC in 'prefer cache' Both CCD0+CCD1 all core: CCD0 all core: CCD1 all core:

I recently bought an ASUS TUF FX504 with an i7 8750h. The first time i ran cinebench (cpu) it has a 900+ score. Note that the first time i run cinebench i don't have any programs like intel xtu, throttlestop, cpuz, etc, just brand new out of the box with nothing installed. The next time i run it came out with only 750 ish score. I monitored the cpu and it was only running at 2.2 Ghz. This was n't caused by thermal throttling, because the cpu's temperatures were really low, only 55-60 celsius under full load. I opened intel xtu and noticed that it has a power limit throttling. And in throttlestop it shows that one of its limits is PL2. I tried undervolting the cache and the cpu core which resulted in an increase to the cpu frequency to 2.5-2.6 Ghz when running cinebench. Same case like before, thermals are not a problem, still hitting 55-60 celsius. Undervolting the cpu cache increases the cpu frequency, while the core clock doesn't do much, but i can only do it until a certain point. The power limit throttling is still there and i think it is the one that is causing the cpu frequency to be so low. Another thing that i noticed is that when the cpu is running all cores at 100% load, the pacakge tdp is only 25W despite the rated tdp at 45W. Changing the package power limit also didn't help. I changed it to 70W but it only reaches a max of 25W TDP when running cinebench. Btw, the cpu can still run up to 4 Ghz in daily tasks where the cpu load is pretty low. Please help me out.

Hello everybody, I just bought a new PC, Full Specs: R5 5600G TeamGroup Vulcan Z 3200Mhz(8GBx2) MSI B450M Pro-VDH Max Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB Ant Esports VS400L PSU(with one Molex fan preinstalled above I/O shields) Ant Esports ICE-130AG I ran the C23 before everything, also have not played any games yet :( And I was shocked, watched a YouTube video and their max temp went 83 while mine was reaching 95 in about a minute! So I opened the case and removed the cooler, and shockingly the CPU was not there when I removed the Wraith Cooler, but it was stuck/ got glued to the heatsink with thermal paste, which I somehow managed to remove(this was so much work, took 3 hours to remove it) using hair dryers and a screwdriver, this was an experience somehow, and now I know that you don't have to pull the CPU cooler straight up in AM4 sockets, but slightly rotate it so that the thermal compound gets weekend. Coming back from that nightmare, I applied a thermal paste that I had from a time ago and everything came back how it was! Now, I left the PC unused for around 25 minutes and here is the graph:(from MSI AfterBurner) The weather here at the time of these screenshots was around 25-28 degrees, I got a good airflow in my room also, have no idea how to measure the room's temperature. I have also tried removing the cabinet's both front and back plate cover, which seemed to have no effect at all. So I think the airflow in the Cabinet is also good! Also, I am running the XMP 1 profile for the RAM and No OC for any of the components, and to tell you even more, the UMA Buffer size/VRAM is set to 2GB for the Vega 7! I set the fan to run at its Full Speed too! Please suggest what should I do! Thank you very much for your valuable time, appreciate it!

Hi, I recently build a new system which is arranged on my testbench. Now I encountered a Problem with running Cinebench R23. Specs: INTEL i7-13700K (currently stock) - Cooled with NOCTUA NH-D15 (LTT-Edition) ASUS Maximus Z790 CORSAIR Dominator 5600MHz 4x16 GB (XMP1 activ) Testbench PS - EVGA Supernova 750 G2 Testbench GraKa - ASUS Strix 980 I had planned to arrange all on the testbench and do some tweeking before I mount the EK-Maximus Waterblock and integrate it into my existing Loop of my "old" PC, to minimize downtime. Steps planned: Stock benchmark with original CPU mount and NH-D15 - passed Stock benchmark with Thermal Grizzly OC frame and NH-D15 - error (but better temps -4 °C overall) OC with NH-D15 Stock benchmark with Thermal Grizzly OC frame and EK-Maximus-WB (got a portable Loop with 240 rad) OC with EK-Maximus-WB Setting up programs etc. for switching plattform. Switch and fine tune. Somehow I´m stuck at the second step now. Cinebench R23 passes 16 rounds and then I get an Application Error while no OC is activ. The thermals are way better with the Thermal Grizzly OC Frame and don`t hit 100 °C anymore like with the original CPU mount. (Sry for the german sensor names.) Also, I´m confused by the Application Error BugReport, because the mentioned Maxon folder does not exist in AppData (hidden folders are activated). Any suggestions on how to proceed? I´m kind of lost...

Does cinebench benefit from dual cpu?

https://imgur.com/a/BZfyt6D I thought a 9700k @ 5ghz should be able to get 10k on multicore? Is there a setting ive forgotten in my bios or something? Im running my cache at 4.7ghz, 16gb 16-18-38 3200mhz corsair dominator memory 4x4gb

Hello guys, Last week I upgraded my pc from a i7 6700k to an i9 10850k with a new Asus PRIME Z490-A motherboard. Before this upgrade the cpu wouldn't get above 60 degrees on maximum load. The cpu cooler is a pretty old corsair H150i pro RGB and isn't changed during the upgrade. After running cinebench for a few minutes the cpu reaches a temp in the low 90's. I have tried to replace the thermal paste with a few different brands but there is no difference. I have also seen someone mention the old corair AIO's don't properly make contact with thin pcb motherboard and need some washers, but this seems kinda odd to me. How could I isolate the problem or is it possible the AIO needs replacement? Specs: - Corsair iCUE 4000X RGB - Cooler Master Extension Kit White / Black - Intel Core i9 10850K - Asus PRIME Z490-A Motherboard - Gigabite 1080ti - Corsair Vengeance PRO RGB 16GB 3000MHz - Corsair H150i pro RGB - 750W Corsair power supply Greetings, Laurens

Hi, Long time lurker, first time poster. I hope I'm doing this right. I recently received my 5900x. Quite happy so far, mostly using for video editing and gaming on the side. Like with every new build, I ran a few benchmarks. And I noticed that I can't quite reach the advertised 4.8ghz boost clock in single core. The CPU sits between 4.5 and 4.6ghz. And doesn't reach benchmark scores from the reviews. (598 in Cinebench R20) The cpu reaches 4.4Ghz on multi-thread and the benchmark score are on par with what's been published in reviews. (8513 in Cinebench R20) XMP and PBO are enabled. My temperatures never go over 78C on load. Is it just bad luck in the silicon lottery or am I missing something? Build: Ryzen 5900x, Noctua DH15 Gigabyte x570 Pro 2x 16Gb Corsair Vengeance LPX 3600 1To Samsung 980 pro GTX 1080

Maxon has release their popular CPU benchmark Cinebench R23. Some info about the new benchmark The download can be found on their website https://www.maxon.net/en/cinebench

i've tried reinstalling it from both Maxon and the Microsoft Store, but neither of them work. changing display scaling and restarting my computer does nothing, i've tried troubleshooting compatibility and yet it's still broken. R20 works just fine, and at the moment it's fine for my needs, though I do wanna keep using the same benchmark standard as everyone else. i'm not entirely sure why it happened although I do know it started after I installed Peggle Deluxe from steam, strangely enough. again, don't know if that's related.

..hi ehm .. so less than a week ago a small shipment of computers arrived to the office and my neighbor next to me is the employee that coordinate/manages/recieves and takes dem out from the big box and sometimes the innerbox and etcera the hw inventory.. When i came back to my desk at one point i saw the transporttable was at the corner of my and my neighbors deskarea.. we have lockers halfwall-sizes that covers behind us. On the tablecart was placed one of the new pcs and thats a thicc boy of a laptop... yikeswaoooe. My previous laptop was The standard hp and now i use a beast of a kaliber that ive been working on for a while to which is to show foundation to why i need a much better performance pc to be able to handle the work i do with among other Excel. My workplace is a servicedesk that supports loads of different ITstuff for the our regions Healthcare.The type of tests, knowlegde, and wisdom is not currently in my area of knowledge. I would be much appriciated for any who could give me a complete set of step by steps to run diagnistics and performance test... this beast is definitly not right configurated.. I unplug the power and its takes like 10 minutes to understand the given instruction before the next frame comes and what comes after well it just looks messy. Ive tried more then 10 instructions to solve the fingerprint reader not being detected device...tried hp hw diagnostic scan... went check senesor....whaat tthe actual fucking crap is this... fingercard reader aint the only seneser so how am i to know what you tested if the only resulsts you give me is "passed"... i dont know if its a hardware failure or not. HP ZBook Fury 15.6 inch G8 Mobile Workstation, i7-11850H, 64.0. 21H2 (osb.19044.2130) Now to sleep, ill post and finish the subject of this post tomorrow..

The results of Cinebench 23 multicore on a new laptop I purchased have got me thinking how much leeway there is for difference between machines. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna be RMA'ing this device because of weird noises it's making, but it also gets a score on Cinebench that is about 2700 points lower than what most reviewers get (I'm getting 7500 in multicore, reviews say 10200, same power profile, same performance profile). How much difference would you say is indication of just normal variance and not an issue? a few hundred points? a thousand?

Summary AMD revealed some impressive overclocking results of its own today. Using "standard liquid cooling", a 280mm AIO, the company's XOC team was able to push a Ryzen 9 7950X as high as 5.5GHz all-core and complete several benchmark runs. In total, four records now been broken by Sampson and blueleader who got a green light to share their Ryzen 9 7950X results. Quotes My thoughts This is quite impressive, as none of these records were broken using LN2 (Liquid Nitrogen). What's also impressive was the fact that there was a CPU-Z Validation at almost 5.8GHz all-core and only at 1.4v. It's a possibility that the 5.8GHz all-core overclock is a golden sample, but it could also mean Zen 4 overclocks well judging by these HWBOT results. As far as the records go, if this is what Zen 4 is capable of doing with a simple AIO CLC, I'm wondering what it's able to achieve with more exotic cooling. Sources https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-breaks-four-hwbot-world-records-with-aio-cooler https://hothardware.com/news/ryzen-7950x-zen-4-cpu-hits-impressive-overclock

Summary Chinese PC enthusiast Extreme Player, with access to a Core i9-13900K engineering sample (ES), tested the chip on a handful synthetic tests; with the processor yielding significant performance gains over its predecessor, the i9-12900K. The most striking performance number has to be the CPU-Z Bench single-core test, which shows an impressive 9.41% increase over that of the i9-12900K. The multi-threaded CPU-Z Bench sees an incredible 46.34% performance increase. The story repeats with Cinebench R23, with an incredible 13.53% single-thread performance increase, and a 40.25% multi-threaded performance increase. Quotes My thoughts I'm happy to see that this chip is already running @ 5.5GHz, with boosts topping @ 5.7GHz. Meaning there's a possibility of a 13900KS SKU in the future that possibly does 6GHz. Problem is, with Intel's own XTU tool it hit 100C peak temperature and as a result, began throttling; this is even with a 360mm AIO CLC cooler. So it's clearly going to be hard to tame this beast, especially if they plan to increase the clocks even further in future SKUs. From the main chart with all the different tests though, you can clearly see the 13900k winning handily at every test. Zen 4 is definitely going to have its work cut out for it. Sources https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-13900k-pre-production-sample-tested-10-faster-than-core-i9-12900k-in-single-core-tests https://www.tweaktown.com/news/87385/intel-core-i9-13900k-pre-production-cpu-has-been-fully-reviewed/index.html https://www.techpowerup.com/296815/intel-raptor-lake-es-posts-9-4-higher-single-core-performance-than-alder-lake https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-raptor-lake-es-is-9-faster-in-single-core-performance-over-alder-lake.html https://hothardware.com/news/13900k-beats-12900k-in-single-core Small update to this story, gaming benchmarks added ~ Summary Intel i9-13900K "Raptor Lake" ES Improves Gaming Minimum Framerates by 11-27% Over "Alder Lake" i9-12900KF. The processor has been tested by Bilibili techtuber "Extreme Player" in a number of games, including Horizon-Zero Dawn, Red Dead Redemption 2, FarCry 6, Forza Horizon 5, Monster Hunter: Rise and PUBG. There are also benchmarks for Final Fantasy Endwalker, CSGO and 3DMark Timespy and Firestrike tests. Quotes My thoughts Some sizeable gains in certain games, but most importantly there's quite a large improvement with minimums; especially at 1080p and 1440p. Meaning frametimes with this CPU are probably really good. Makes sense that AMD rumors have them releasing the 3D V-Cache parts sooner rather than later if these numbers are anything to go by. Sources https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/minimum-framerates-of-games-evaluated-on-an-engineering-sample-of-intels-core-i9-13900k-have-improved.html https://www.techpowerup.com/296928/intel-i9-13900k-raptor-lake-es-improves-gaming-minimum-framerates-by-11-27-over-i9-12900kf https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-13900k-engineering-sample-tested-in-games-shows-improvement-in-minimum-framerate https://www.tomshardware.com/news/core-i9-13900k-outperform-core-i9-12900k-by-5-percent-in-early-gaming-benchmarks Another small update to this story, CPU-Z benchmarks added ~ Summary An alleged engineering sample of the Core i9-13900K 'Raptor Lake' CPU has emerged over at CPU-Z Validation website database, spotted by Twitter leaker @TUM_APISAK. Quotes My thoughts Since this is on a DDR4 motherboard and is being paired with slow 2666MHz DDR4, I would say the results are pretty spectacular as it's not even 3200MHz or 3600MHz DDR4 that they are using here (the usual sweet spots for DDR4). Let alone DDR5 (which definitely will benefit the platform). It's also on Windows 10, which can prove to be slower compared to Windows 11 on Alder Lake and also probably Raptor Lake. The sample in its current state is faster than a 24c/48t Threadripper 2970WX. This is with all the caveats in place (the slow DDR4, Windows 10, etc.). Also, there have been 13900k engineering samples that are going up to 5.5GHz, with dual cores boosting to 5.8GHz. While here this sample is locked to 5.0GHz. Meaning again another variable to add to the equation of further improvements being able to be made with final silicon. The only downfall I see here, is again the CPU was hitting 100°C, meaning cooling this beast is going to be difficult. Sources https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-13900k-24-core-processor-spotted-on-cpu-z-validator-website-along-with-slow-ddr4-memory https://www.techpowerup.com/297036/intel-raptor-lake-es-cpu-visits-cpu-z-database

I have a 2700X and the sinle core score is around 100, but the multicore score is between 900 and 1,000. I looked at 10 websites that show the average score for a 2700x, and they all show a multicore score over 10,000-11,000 That means my score is TEN times ower than the average 2700x on Cinebench. What can I do/. What am I doing wrong? I have 16 GB of, 3200MHZ ram but in the BIOS if I go higher than 2993 MHZ it causes random reboots or crashes within windows, Motherboard is a Gigabyte X470 Aurus ultra Gaming please help

I have been having trouble with my 5900x. I have a 360mm AIO and just applied Arctic Mx-6 thermal paste. While applying the thermal paste, I could not hear any water sounds in the AIO. Cpu is clocked at 4.5ghz, and in Cinebench it goes to over 87 degrees celsius. Is this normal? I feel like it is very hot considering the 360mm AIO. I got a score of 22400. Please, any help is appreciated.

Summary Jarrod’sTech provides a first look at MSI’s 2023 gaming laptops featuring the Intel Core i9-13980HX ‘laptop’ processor. The mobile chip broke the 30,000 point barrier in Cinebench R23, making it one of the fastest CPUs to date regardless of whether desktop or mobile SKUs. With this result the 13980HX was able to outperform several high performance desktop CPUs from both AMD and Intel, including the 12-core Ryzen 9 7900X, the 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and the 16-core Core i7-13700K. Quotes My thoughts I made a news post back in late December showing the 13900HX beating out the 12900k, 13700k, and 3960X in Geekbench 5. About a week a later a Geekbench 5 entry showed the 13980HX being only 4% slower than a desktop Ryzen 9 7950X. Now we finally have Cinebench R23 numbers and this 13980HX is an absolute monster. These next-gen laptops are really taking things to the next level. It should be noted though that the 13980HX is essentially a desktop 13900k retrofitted to fit inside a laptop's maximum power envelope. Either way, having flagship desktop CPU performance in a laptop is pretty awesome. I'm looking forward to seeing those 4090 Laptop GPU performance figures next, to really see what these next-gen laptops are capable of. According to a Chinese media report, RTX 40 Laptop GPU launch will be split between two dates. RTX 4090 and 4080 laptops will start shipping on February 8th, while RTX 4070,4060,4050 will be available on February 22nd. RTX 4090 and 4080 sales will begin on February 1st and since preorders are usually attached to review embargo, there's a good chance we see reviews in just about two weeks. Sources https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-13980hx-laptop-cpu-is-faster-than-amd-threadripper-2990wx-in-cinebench-test https://www.techspot.com/news/97281-laptop-core-i9-13980hx-smashes-30k-barrier-cinebench.html

Hello! It feels like I have tried everything but when running cinebench my CPU gets to 100 degrees in like 5 seconds. I just updated the system with CPU, motherboard and RAM. Initially I thought it was the CPU cooler so I have switched from a corsair watercooler to a Noctua NH-D15S but the problem remains. I have tried 3 different pastes and I have put the CPU cooler in all different directions. I have tried with the GPU fans on 0-100%. I have tried with closed sidepanels on the chassi and open sidepanels. I have tried to turn the chassi fans from 0 to 100%. Is it possible that the CPU got fried the first time it reached 100 degrees and now its just useless? It still have good speed and its 32 degrees when idle. The Chassi fans is installed in the built in fan controller. I have tried to connect that to both FAN_1 and CPU_OPT. I dont know what program to use to control them but all fans are spinning. I have downloaded fan control but it only finds CPU and GPU fans. I understand that you might need more information but maybe we can start with this. I am using Intel ETU to check on the temperatures and loads. It is NOT overclocked. SETUP: OS: Windows 10, I can update to 11 if needed. MOBO: Asus prime z790-p WIFI CPU: i9 12900k GPU: Gigabyte RTX3080 RAM: FURY 32GB DDR5 6400Mhz PSU: Corsair RM750X Chassi: NZXT Noctis 450 ROG CPU cooler: Noctua NH-D15S Chassi fans: - 3 120mm front intake - 1 150mm back exhaust - 2 120mm top exhaust.