schwellmo92

Hi Folks! Building my first NAS/Plex server. Looking for reccomendations on: Unraid vs TrueNAS Jellyfin vs Plex (note: need HDR to SDR tone mapping) Was thinking of using following hardware: i3 12100 (hardware acceleration for transcoding) (does not support ECC, does this matter?) 2x8GB RAM Fractal Design Node 304 case 6x 8TB Seagate Archive HDD's

RTX 4080 12GB should really be the RTX 4070 but is called the 4080 so they can say the 4080 starts at $899 and make it look like prices haven’t gone up much. Change my mind.

IOD is now 6nm so hopefully there is some meaningful efficiency gain there.

12600K launched at $320 MSRP, what makes you think the 13600K with more cores will launch at a lower price? If anything the price should increase.

If they applied the same premium they’re paying for Activision, Sony would cost about $230b

In single core, lately it is common. It has happened the last two generations for both Intel and AMD.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/16446/amd-ryzen-9-5980hs-cezanne-review-ryzen-5000-mobile-tested

Sorry meant 2021

Used 3070 EVGA XC3 Ultra in Feb 2021 for $1020 AUD (730~ USD)

It is a 3080 “tier” membership. It doesn’t run on a 3080 and you don’t get your own dedicated GPU.

I would recommend getting a B motherboard and non K CPU. You’ll save money and won’t lose much performance at all. The 10th series can only run 4k at 30hz over HDMI so I would get a 11th series CPU do it runs at 60hz.

I had a quick google of MT4 and doesn't look very CPU intensive. Either of these two will be fine: Intel i5 11400 (make sure it's not 11400F, that doesn't have a iGPU) with a B560 motherboard that has two video outputs (most likely will have 1x display port and 1x HDMI) AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with a B550 motherboard that has two video outputs (most likely will have 1x display port and 1x HDMI) They should both cost roughly the same and perform roughly the same.

It will depend on how CPU intensive your trading software is. Do you plan on having a graphics card or would you use a CPU with integrated graphics?

I understand that but then consider they say they can achieve 80% more performance than the “2.6” Skylake Cores (2.6 x 1.8 = 4.68). Are they really saying that 4 efficiency cores is equal to more than 4 Skylake cores? It doesn’t sound right to me…

I'm really confused by the efficiency cores because they are claiming up to 80% more performance at 4c/4t vs Skylake 2c/4t. Isn't there current generation core only like 20% faster than Skylake? So a 4c/4t efficiency core would be 50%~ more performance than their current cores at 2c/4t? Which would mean the efficiency core on a 1:1 basis is basically comparable to the current cores? Doesn't add up to me...

ITER should be the first real implementation of an energy net-positive fusion reactor but I'm not sure how far off that is. It has been in planning for over a decade IIRC and they are still early in the building phase right now.

Graphics performance should be pretty close, the 5700G has a much higher power budget which is reflected in the difference in GPU clocks (1-1.6 vs 2ghz).

Oldddddd news, plus they would’ve missed out on billions of dollars.

They do exist in many games and that was what was used in this instance.

I had a read of the Intel specifications, the laptop representing Intel did have a higher TGP so have updated the topic.

Summary Intel just wrapped up their COMPUTEX opening keynote, in which they showed a single benchmark which was Crysis Remastered comparing the new 10nm Intel Core i9-11980HK versus the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX. In this benchmark Intel are claiming a win of 117.62 FPS versus 95.86 FPS for AMD which represents a 22% higher average FPS. The laptop specifications are located at https://intel.com/computex21 (link only works on mobile for me) Intel used the MSI GP76 Leopard which is a 17.3" 2.9kg laptop with a 4.5 hour battery life to represent the 11980HK and a Asus ROG Strix G533QS which is a 15.6" 2.3kg laptop with 8 hour battery life to represent the 5900HX. Other than that the MSI laptop also has a 155w TGP whereas the Asus laptop has a 130w TGP. Intel also made no mention of performance modes on either laptop, which do directly affect power limits in some cases (for example the Asus laptop is only 130w in 'Turbo' mode). Quotes My thoughts There is no doubt in my mind that the new Intel chips are likely to best their AMD competition but 22%~ seems unlikely. Given Intel only displayed a single benchmark this must be the benchmark that shows the greatest difference in performance between the two competitors offerings. Obviously some of that performance delta is also down to the different GPU power limits. Intel has also not documented the power profile used on the laptops, the Asus only runs at 130w in 'Turbo' mode so could be running as low as 115w, I was not able to find if the MSI had similar functionality or if it ran always at 155w. Sources

This has always been a thing with Intel motherboards. Some of them run at the Intel specified power limits, some of them do not.

My router is nearby but I don't have 2.4GHz enabled so can't comment on that.

I have the same headset, I get the pop and crackle if I'm far away or if the microwave is on. Are there any other 2.4GHz devices that could be causing interference?