Jump to content

Droidbot

Member
  • Posts

    9,011
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Droidbot

  1. 6 minutes ago, Cyber Akuma said:

    I kinda need this system on Sunday so I can't really swap the CPUs back that quickly, mainly because the cooler is a total PAIN to clean and I am running out of cleaning materials and the higher-end paste I used for it. If it is a bad CPU contact though, then wouldn't the error happen every time and not be correctable if the signal is physically being blocked? I never ran OCCT back when I first installed this RAM with the old CPU, but I noticed a few small "WHEA Event 2" entries from around when I first installed it and was likely during my Prime95 testing.

     

     

    Yeah I know, which was a worry if the CPU would be compatible. But this is apparently a popular system to buy cheap used and then upgrade the CPU for and many have supposedly done it: https://greenpcgamers.forumbee.com/t/634f91/precision-t3610-hardware-upgrade-guide

     

    The built-in diagnostics for this Dell also found no problems with any of the components, not even in through test mode.

     

    Why would the WHEA errors not have shown up in either Memtest86 or Memtest86+?

    That's very fair. If you are still scared about stability, removing DIMMs until the problem stops appearing would be my strategy, or removing all the RAM and returning DIMMs one by one. Otherwise I'd just go on as normal. Thinking about it again, it could very well be a RAM issue and you've just never tested to this extent before. Why does it appear only under Linpack? Good question - it could be heat or workload related, or even both. 

     

    The CPUs are much the same during this generation - I wouldn't worry about what the manufacturer says too much.

     

     

  2. to rule out the CPU being the culprit - have you tried swapping the 1620v2 back in and running that same test?

    could be a faulty memory channel or something on the new processor that didn't show up under p95.

     

    also, dell has not validated 26xx CPUs with this board, so beware of that. this is a workstation machine, hence why it's only validated with 16xx chips. 26xx chips are supported by the chipset (intel didn't really care at this point).

  3. Just now, SINCLRNZ said:

    i've been told to try one of these ground loop iso 

    AA3086-ground-loop-noise-isolator-stereo-3-5mmImageMain-900.jpg

    ground loops could help - that's worth a stab too. but I think it's a misconfiguration - usually these things shouldn't have a hum unless they're manufactured incorrectly.

  4. A decent audio interface or dedicated DAC - something like a Behringer UMC202HD or UMC22 (cheaper option, but may have some more noise) would clean that output up quite well, along with giving you an ADC for use with mics and stuff.

     

    But you might want to take a stab at changing the settings in the ASUS Audio panel relating to impedance to see if the issue goes away - could be set too high or too low.

  5. 1 minute ago, TofuHaroto said:

    At x570 ? Maybe 

    B450 ? It's really good 

    Don't look at a brand and decide if the product is good or not 

    And I suggested a pro 4 which is made by ASRock 

    If you want a decent really good b550 board 

    Msi makes one of the better ones 

    Didn't mention -- anything decent on ITX?

    It's a touch exxy but considering the gigabyte b550i

     

    Just now, Mateyyy said:

    Going with Coffee Lake (9000 series) makes literally 0 sense now.

    Either go with a 10600K and Z490, or 3600/3700X and B550/X570. What's your budget, and what parts do you need to purchase exactly?

    the board's real cheap -- that's the only time for me that it'd make sense. board's $140AUD for .. what's really an 8x50a stage vrm with mediocre onboard audio and great memoc.

     

    i'm coming from a ddr3 platform so i'm buying the whole thing from scratch. budget is soft cap of around 750AUD (cpu/mem/mobo/psu), hard cap of 1k.

  6. Ayo.

     

    Basically -- 3600 + B550-something-with-decent-VRMs, or 9600KF + EVGA Z370 (I can BIOS update this, dw) Micro (or maybe a 9700KF if I can fit it in the budget).

    9600KF comes in at $100 cheaper than the 3600 combo (based on pricing with the Steel Legend, but I'm open to other recommendations for boards)

     

    My workloads are:

    - Gaming (CSGO, Valorant competitively, Forza H4 and COD MW on the side)

    - Photo editing (Minor edits with Lightroom and some Photoshop, nothing intensive)
    - Occasional video editing with Resolve, usually H264 1080p but some H265 4k60

     

    The only thing that really scares me is the 6threads on the 9600KF and how that'll age with time - I was burnt hard by the 4670K in games and I don't want that to happen again, so I'm shying towards more threads/cores.

     

    Thanks for your responses / thoughts.

  7. 10 hours ago, wkdpaul said:

    Noob user ; I don't have *application* installed!! I really need it for my daily tasks!!!!11!1!1

    Tech ; Let me remote in and have a look!

     

    *Remotes in, open the Start menu, copy the shortcut to the desktop*

     

    Tech ; There you go, you're all set

     

     

    I hear that WAY TOO OFTEN!!!! How do people deal with this on their personal computer? Like it's the same thing! You don't open the fuckin start menu even at home?

     

    This is braking my brain in so many different ways...

    Users are probably used to consumer devices like iPads where everything is on one screen.

     

    ... it is on one part of the screen (the fucking start menu), but they just don't learn.

  8. 17 minutes ago, MeatFeastMan said:

    Well...it's a 2070 so it's definitely not worth it. If you want a high quality cooler and a gpu with similar performance and the same vram, then go for vega 64. The Sapphire Nitro+ version (Arguably best cooler for vega) is on a great price in most countries at the moment. It solves the problem while being far cheaper than the overpriced 2070. Vega 64 also has HBCC which can help in stuff like video editing and rendering if you run out of vram in really heavy workloads.

     

    https://pcpartpicker.com/product/MssmP6/sapphire-radeon-rx-vega-64-8gb-nitro-video-card-11275-03-40g

    HBCC made shit all difference at release on Vega and still makes shit all difference now, no dev built for their stupid architecture features because nobody bought vega

     

    a 2070 is literally $60 more than a v64 for better compute performance (except blender/prorender), better gaming performance in literally every situation, and rt/tensor cores (but that's a fucking stupid gimmick too, so i'm not even going to hold that against the v64).

  9. 43 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

    The reason workstation cards are expensive is by how much VRAM it has.  A 14GB VRAM nvidia card is about 2000 dollars.  They even have 44GB of VRAM but thats costs 10 thousand dollars.

     

     

    for cards like the titan series yes

     

    for cards like quadro/tesla/grid, the cost comes from getting the card certified with independent vendors (ISVs) that the card will deliver the best performance in a certain application.

     

    7 minutes ago, LukeSavenije said:

    well, i know with adobe that intel performs better, cinema4d better on many cores and that unreal isn't that heavy. i think a vii with a first gen threadripper should be a great start, and isn't that expensive, yet has a great upgrade path

    9900k would be recommended if he's actually gonna use premiere, qsv+intel bias means it always wins in that shit

     

    c4d is hard to bench as nobody has really tested cb r20 with lots of hw and r15 is too outdated to actually draw conclusions from.

     

    vii is meme heater, only recommended for prorender/blender.

×